les_stockton wrote:
I really want a Canon 300mm f/2.8 but it's pretty pricy. I've borrowed one a couple of times in the past, and the sharpness and quick focus are remarkable. However, I'm also considering, as an alternative, the Sigma 300mm f/2.8. I like the idea of getting the IS (or OS as I understand, with Sigma) models.
Does anyone have experience with either of these with sports photography, and am I justified in preferring image stabilization?
MT put me on the sigma 120-300 2.8 zoom with OS. This lens is the second in the line. found one on Ebay for $1400 vs the new version @ $3300. Image quality is about the same. I mostly use the lens on my tripod with gimbal head as it weighs 8 pounds. So far it is a great lens with fast focusing.