Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: toptrainer
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 31 next>>
Feb 6, 2021 07:57:14   #
Sidwalkastronomy wrote:
nice photo all looks good w/o pp.
Thank you
Go to
Feb 5, 2021 22:35:01   #
I have been doing alot of video watching and playing with my light setup. I started to do more head shots, and this is pretty much out of camera. What do you all think?


Go to
Feb 5, 2021 09:51:45   #
rmcgarry331 wrote:
Go to Tether Tools at https://tethertools.com/. They will have the proper cable and additional accessories to assist you in your tethering venture. I do suggest getting their Jerk Stoppers for both your camera and computer to protect the ports.

Thank you all for your help.
Go to
Feb 4, 2021 22:21:45   #
TriX wrote:
What year MacBook Pro? (Need to identify what type of port you have to recommend the correct cable if you’re going to use a cable instead of WiFi to tether)
usbc
Go to
Feb 4, 2021 16:27:16   #
I’m trying to connect my Canon 6D to my MacBook Pro, so when I am taking photos I can import them directly in to lightroom. I’ve looked up some cables and I’m seeing eight pin and five pin and I’m not quite sure which one is the one I need to use. If anybody can help me out that would be awesome.
Go to
Jan 20, 2021 22:27:07   #
jim quist wrote:
We have both the canon 17-40 f4 and the 16-35 2.8. The 17-40 gives us sharper images.

I have ordered the 17-40, thanks.
Go to
Jan 20, 2021 20:55:10   #
TriX wrote:
Excellent choice. Lots of lens for the $. I use mine whenever I do indoor architectural shots.
👍
Go to
Jan 20, 2021 20:49:49   #
TriX wrote:
I was suggeting the 17-40 for your 6D, not the 80D. Your 17mm on the 80D is the FF equivalent FOV of 27mm on the 6D. You’d be better off using your 24-105 on your 6D if going wide is you goal.

I’m looking at a Canon EF 17-40 mm F/4L USM for $320.
Go to
Jan 20, 2021 20:35:52   #
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
I do most of my interiors, in average size rooms with a focal length between 24mm and 35mm on full-frame cameras. I only go-to focal lengths between 12 and 17mm for very small rooms.

I try not to use extremely shot wide-angle lenses in average size rooms so as not to unnecessarily exaggerate the size of each room.

Sometimes a shorter focal length is handy for foreground framing lie shoot through archways or using furnishings for foreground detail.
Thank you for the advice.
Go to
Jan 20, 2021 20:34:51   #
TriX wrote:
I doubt if you need anything much wider than 18-20 mm indoors. Going wider risks inaccurate images that look nothing like the actual space as mentioned above. If price in the $400 range is important, I would certainly consider the Canon 17-40 f4L if the 16-35 f4L is too pricey - it’s an excellent lens for the $. Regarding your images, I congratulate you for keeping your vertical lines vertical and parallel.
17-40 is more in my range, I May just try using my 80D and my 17-70 2.8.
Go to
Jan 20, 2021 20:32:45   #
imagemeister wrote:
As mentioned, the 24mm on full frame is the go to focal length for most low distortion work. The 17-35 has the most really usable focal lengths - including for multi-exposure stitches.

But, unless you are in a high end market, I do not really see the need for FF. You could use this 15mm f4 fully manual poor man's shift lens on a Canon crop frame body for most interior work - IMO

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Venus-Laowa-15mm-f-4-Wide-Angle-1-1-Macro-Lens-with-Shift-for-Canon-EF-Mount/283984246483?_trkparms=ispr%3D1&hash=item421ec7b6d3:g:GGIAAOSw1g1fYduB&amdata=enc%3AAQAFAAACcBaobrjLl8XobRIiIML1V4Imu%252Fn%252BzU5L90Z278x5ickk7PdDazAlGltMLJlUhrWsD088Er6PAO3g%252FYk2TuSewhvewKnEtiazN3zVgM6BbZS9rACNzliWQejyTlY3jnRHeDjovBQFibUTsi6rdDAUSnsq%252BsG4ZCDBxvEte7eo3In%252Bg%252FjKKvUXpKria89CDobycmw%252FQS%252BuoYC9ji2S7pEzmbEJ2orsiah0AGzOrl3%252FLtF%252BjSByrWB0NehA85ZI1DmKcHO4wvCTJ4BI3Mm7UXOam3fhy5rSY%252BBglYRrYocwWyPK9mzEMTH6Rc7qlAivu4iNmJHPYxAWtw5Kf2PZlHP0UM06EZm%252FFKDFB4PIC9tw5fcHmlooi0GhPRFd4oyAnbw5p3VvvJOKWCDSEewKcNm7ZyXQbEtW8sHyDkV%252B7ioFvxUQVmCUkTmhen%252Fy5tkbnYcbV2b0LVnhPvJhTgI%252BviJCwfPqsIrW5Aa06DKAmHGERueSvoiMUP%252FBfBzWWy7mbDCt1zG3xwg2%252FEIeiifgOlKABQSxze5UZRgizmFQ7kFTbFZS8EBZQYLz3wyxfuc6KFVg3PS%252B5YmI5RuYdIF7kr8CeSnSHfKMeskrWQkXHFVGOEy1Aj9WUbfAuR9558oCPGpRBkatCIQi8CkGeHk7Jsh2aKXNThHejuqqW4NVzQenwR5qQPwBkASRjN2TBxUndD9%252BtMd9ZkXW84U9zkkSiWei36Cc%252BQq9yht59VHtADinvhUFa9ZxNDckVPVsVr7HA%252FM73RgVWs%252FnPTA5Mi2fjlEJI88e5Z8DFOmfRtoy4%252FkYzQnJlF0ardltbfDc22%252BKIw0n3g%253D%253D%7Ccksum%3A283984246483abcb541e9da445ef9874738e562cc2a5%7Campid%3APL_CLK%7Cclp%3A2334524
As mentioned, the 24mm on full frame is the go to ... (show quote)

I actually do have a crop sensor camera and a 17-70 2.8 I may try also.
Go to
Jan 20, 2021 20:30:52   #
BassmanBruce wrote:
Just a heads up, I had a Tokina at-pro 11-16mm and it was a crop sensor lens.
Don’t know if that apples to the lens(es) you are looking at but though I would mention it.
Great lens, but I got a FF and sold all my crop gear a couple yrs ago.

Thank you
Go to
Jan 20, 2021 19:16:35   #
Thank you for your input, and the kind words @ the photos.
Go to
Jan 20, 2021 18:41:07   #
For those of you out there that may know, is it better to have a atx-I 11-16mm F2.8 lens or a 17-35 mm F4 lens when you’re shooting real estate photography? Both lenses will be on a full frame camera and was looking to find the pluses and negative of both lenses. The lenses are a Tokina lens for a Canon 6D. The 11-16mm is on sale for $449, and the 17-35 Is on sale for $369. I am currently using the 24-105 and just need a little more with for those tighter bathroom shots. I am attaching a couple the shots that I took yesterday with the mentioned above lens.

Kitchen


Living room


Bathroom

Go to
Jan 18, 2021 10:02:57   #
I do have the 24-105
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 31 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.