Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: winterrose
Page: <<prev 1 ... 333 334 335 336
Feb 20, 2013 08:35:19   #
Getting the hang of Photoshop Cs2 back in 2002, the boy was a friend's son playing in the park, the asteriod a piece of pummice stone from the laundry, the space ships from google and I "painted" the rest. Made up of over a dozen layers if I remember rightly. Just a bit of fun so please don't psychoanalise me.


Go to
Feb 20, 2013 07:45:37   #
kit_kit wrote:
My camera is the D3100.

In addition to the kit lens I have the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX Lens and the Nikon 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S DX Lens.

Is there something I would use the kit lens for that I could not do with my other lens?


When I sold my D5000 for a D7000 the 18-55 went with it along with the 55-200 second kit lens. I very soon bought another 18-55, a VR, because nothing can replace this little lightweight gem for less than 4X the price. OK it's made of plastic and it certainly feels like it but as long as you use a bit of due care and don't hammer nails with it it punches way beyond it's weight. It's so cheap to buy new that it's hardly worth selling. How sharp? The attached macro sample image of the Nikon logo on the front of the D5000 on-board camera flash housing, taken by Nikon D7000, 18-55mm lens @ 55mm, 1/60 sec, f11, flash fired. As you say, you are just starting out, and the very fact that you ask this question indicates to me that you have not begun to explore the joys, satisfaction and self expression of photography. Rather than just taking snapshots of groups of friends and family in front of landmarks, experiment and ask UHHers. There is plenty of valuable knowledge and experience right here. Have fun! Rob.


Go to
Feb 19, 2013 19:52:34   #
gordnanaimo wrote:
nice shot> I take it you're a lady photographer or if you're a man--- how's your nose.


It's been better!
Go to
Feb 19, 2013 09:06:59   #
Been trying my hand at taking portraits. Here's one of my girlfriend's husband.


Go to
Feb 19, 2013 03:34:04   #
Karl P wrote:
winterrose wrote:
First effort at a panorama? Wish my first effort was as good! I now use Photoshop Cs6 which in most cases does a very good job of stitching multiple images. I've found that:- the best focal length is just over 50mm equivalent which is, as you say, 35mm for a DX body, so there is minimal distortion, keep the camera as level as possible and overlap the images by approximately 25%. I usually let the camera's 'P' setting decide exposure because Cs6 matches adjacent images so well but you may have to help other software a little. Keep in mind that the file sizes can very quickly overwhelm the available ram in your computer, (I now have 16 gig which seems to be enough) so you may have to reduce the pixels per inch resolution of your images before you stitch. I have always needed to tidy up by cropping or cloning so I shoot portrait to increase the vertical angle of view of the 50mm lens. Be sure that your "sweep" remains true to the horizontal, don't follow a slope up or down for instance as this will distort or produce jagged edges in the pano. Do a few practice sweeps, use a tripod by all means but with a bit of practice freehand saves a lot of setting up getting the pan head set on the bubble etc. That about it really, the rest is up to you. Have fun!!
First effort at a panorama? Wish my first effort w... (show quote)


Hi winterrose

many thanks for your repsonse - loads of advice to work through and aftr reading it a couple of times is slowly sinking in.

When using your camera in a portrait view - do you go more than one row deep or keep it to a single row accross?

Do you keep the "pivot point" directly under the lens centre or is this irrelevant within reason?

Thanks for your assistance

Karl
quote=winterrose First effort at a panorama? Wish... (show quote)


Whether you shoot a double row or not would depend entirely on the scene you wish to capture however be aware that it takes a lot of extra processing power. Regarding the camera pivot center, I have done a 180 pano from the top of the QI building, the tallest building here on the Gold Coast in Queensland Australia, comprising 42 portrait shots in two rows taken as I walked around the periphery of the observation level. Hardly taking much notice of pivoting around the whatsisname of the lens and my then Cs5 put it all together OK. I had to reduce the file size of each image before stitching because with only 4 Gig of RAM I was running out of memory. I have 16 Gig now but believe me that gets eaten up alarmingly as well. Even so the finished image is more than sixty megabytes. Just experiment and find out what works best with the "kit" you have however, judging by your first fine effort, you will soon be able to fire off the shots that work without worrying too much about the technique required. Have fun!
Go to
Feb 18, 2013 20:26:57   #
[quote=Bram boy][quote=gregoryd45][quote=Bram boy]
rlaugh wrote:
bikinkawboy wrote:
Every year I help judge a science fair at a local middle school. All I can say is that I would certainly hope Bram doesn't judge a science fair my kid was in. Talk about stepping on someone's self esteem and then wiping it off their boot on the grass. There are ways to offer a critique without being quite so brutal. When I judge a science fair, even when the project is lousy, I make sure that I always write down at least one positive comment, whether it be the use of bright colors, originality or so on. When the kid comes to school dirty and stinking, it's obvious that the parent or parents of these kids don't give a rip about their kid or their school work, which is no doubt why their project stinks. It saddens me when the kid lights up when I ask them about the work they did, where they got the idea and so
on. It's pitifully obvious that these kids receive no attention or interest at
home. I do always give critiques, such as the need for brighter colors as a
way to help them next year, but at least when I'm done with them, they feel
no worse and many seem to feel better just because I showed a little interest.And rlaugh, as for your photos, I personally like the second, unaltered on better. Just my personal tastes, but I like the different textures of the fruit. And while that disturbing looking waffle-cracker thing may seem out of place because it's not a fruit, Mr Waffle does throw in some straight lines, the only stright lines in the photo except for the triangles of the place mat below the plate. I really like your lighting, I guess because I've never delved into
still life photos.
for the critiques, don't let some of the more intense opinions bother you. I figure a critique properly done should result in the critiqued thanking the critiquer, rather than them wanting to bury that person's camera in a well used cat box.[/quote
Thank you very much!!...none of the helpful critique bothered me at all,thats why I asked for it!! Its ones that offer nothing better then..."don't bother" that
are useless and non productive! And if you check,these types never post pics!
I just hope this kind of crap doesn't discourage some new members!! Againthank you!![/quote

If your critiqueing my take on your photo , bravo thats what i mean say whats
In your head . But lets face it, your too kind[/quote]

rlaugh may be too kind, but you Bram-boy (what a great name) are still an
asshole, who has nothing of merit or importance to say. As I have said before,
as well as others, if you want to be taken seriously, learn how to spell and
the proper use of grammar. And, please no more sad stories how you grew up
poor, and had to work the farm and couldn't learn to spell. You have a
computer use it to learn.
Every year I help judge a science fair at a local ... (show quote)



come on ; did you beleive that , is that all you can muster up you are also to kind . I can think of more even if you cant . I want more lay it on .
quote=bikinkawboy Every year I help judge a scien... (show quote)


Idiot
Go to
Feb 18, 2013 08:57:30   #
First effort at a panorama? Wish my first effort was as good! I now use Photoshop Cs6 which in most cases does a very good job of stitching multiple images. I've found that:- the best focal length is just over 50mm equivalent which is, as you say, 35mm for a DX body, so there is minimal distortion, keep the camera as level as possible and overlap the images by approximately 25%. I usually let the camera's 'P' setting decide exposure because Cs6 matches adjacent images so well but you may have to help other software a little. Keep in mind that the file sizes can very quickly overwhelm the available ram in your computer, (I now have 16 gig which seems to be enough) so you may have to reduce the pixels per inch resolution of your images before you stitch. I have always needed to tidy up by cropping or cloning so I shoot portrait to increase the vertical angle of view of the 50mm lens. Be sure that your "sweep" remains true to the horizontal, don't follow a slope up or down for instance as this will distort or produce jagged edges in the pano. Do a few practice sweeps, use a tripod by all means but with a bit of practice freehand saves a lot of setting up getting the pan head set on the bubble etc. That about it really, the rest is up to you. Have fun!!
Go to
Feb 18, 2013 07:56:35   #
Hello nanaval, winterrose here, thank you for your welcome to UHH. This is by no means a criticism at all because I really like your image. I just would like to pass on that I addressed this type of exercise a while ago but I couldn't quite get the reflection looking right. Then it dawned on me that the problem lay in the fact that the reflection visible was (such as in this case) what the subject would look like (flipped) from a vantage point somewhat below the camera or observer's position. Regards...
Go to
Feb 17, 2013 19:59:25   #
rlaugh wrote:
nanaval wrote:
tk wrote:
Winterrose, you came off pretty strong, I thought. I don't understand why you felt the need to bring up the photoshopping. You left me feeling that you were accusing him of something. Rlaugh is a great guy and would help anyone. He reacted to your strong remarks. That is how I see it.


I agree Winterrose. For someone who has been only in UHH for a week I too think he came on strong. Let him show his work before jumping in so quick. (Hope not another JR1) Rlaugh comes over as a great guy and has helped me.
quote=tk Winterrose, you came off pretty strong, ... (show quote)


Thank you nanaval...I certainly hope I didn't over react,and apologize if I did! I try to joke and have fun on here as well as learn, and help! Sorry it came to this! Again thank you!
quote=nanaval quote=tk Winterrose, you came off ... (show quote)


Apologies to all if I got off on the wrong foot! (ThE ALl CapS WaS ONly bEcAuSE i accIdENTlY HiT tHE cAPs locK kEY aND dIDn't nOtICE....I am a very strong supporter of Photoshop, I consider it a very powerful part of my hobby. You created a very fine still life reminiscent of a classic art work from something which straight out of the camera probably only looked like a photo of a plate of fruit on a table! I will post something when I feel that I can also provide an image as worthy as you have done.
Go to
Feb 17, 2013 17:52:02   #
rlaugh wrote:
winterrose wrote:
THE EXIF DATA INDICATES THAT BOTH PHOTOS WERE PHOTOSHOPED ???


WHAT IS YOUR POINT!!! I shoot in raw and PHOTOSHOP most of my pics with crop,contrast,brightness,WB,spot removal,such as removing crumbs as I did in this shot, any number of combinations!! It was never implied that I did NOTHING to the origional,people wanted to see the shot without the paint effect!!! I think that if you shoot in RAW you have to make changes in MOST of your shots!! Thank you for trying to protect the GULLIBLE people on here,I'm sure they are happy to know the PHOTOSHOP POLICE are out! Have a very good day,I'm sure you feel better now! :thumbup: P.S. I really like all the pics you have never posted!!
quote=winterrose THE EXIF DATA INDICATES THAT BOT... (show quote)


My, you are touchy!!! You asked for critique then you said that you had enhanced the shot in order to create the "look" you were after in the first place. PERFECT!!! That's precisely what I do!!! I was only pointing out that both of the shots you posted were the same. If you had shown us the original (RAW which was only converted to jpeg and other wise unaltered) shot I expect that you would have attracted praise (including from me) for your Photoshopping skills as well. P.S. I have not posted any of my stuff as yet because I have been a member of UHH for exactly one week. P.P.S. From what I have seen on this site so far those people who take the time to respond to requests for help certainly don't do so to hurt anyone's feelings. P.P.P.S. Probably more times than not the camera alone cannot produce the "look" I am after and I have absolutely no problem with your approach. Regards...
Go to
Feb 17, 2013 09:07:06   #
THE EXIF DATA INDICATES THAT BOTH PHOTOS WERE PHOTOSHOPED ???
Go to
Feb 17, 2013 08:20:03   #
Sounds like my Mom.
Go to
Feb 17, 2013 07:50:11   #
Before you jump onto that dreaded law of diminishing returns wagon are you really getting the most from the kit you have? A sharper lens will not be of any help if your settings and/or technique are lacking. Birds move quickly and at random. Even their rapid breathing can affect the sharpness of you photos. Can you fill the frame with the subject or are you forced to crop? Even moderate cropping very rapidly eats into the effective pixel count. How steady is your camera during shutter release? Test your D5000 and zoom in similar lighting conditions to ascertain when your camera's ISO noise reaches your limit of acceptability then shoot at that ISO setting. This will ensure that you have available the fastest shutter speed for the lighting conditions. Is yours a G or a VR? You mustn't forget that the crop factor means you have a 450mm equivalent which even with VR is a lot of lens to hand hold and still expect optimum sharpness. I owned a D5000 but when I updated I kept my Nikon 70-300 VR because (mine at least) is acceptably sharp and mated to the D3 can focus and track as fast as I can acquire the subject
Go to
Feb 17, 2013 06:34:51   #
Make sure that the auto focus settings in the CUSTOM SETTING MENU a1 AF-C and a2 AF-S are set to Focus not Release. This ensures that the shutter will not fire unless the subject is in perfect focus. Your question suggests that you are new to all this apparent complexity. Photography is a hobby which is at first a very steep learning curve, so ask questions and do a lot of reading, on UHH and the vast information available on the web. Read your D7000 manual and learn the basic functions of your camera then go out and take lots of photographs. Set your camera to 'P' (program mode) and use auto focus and let your camera do all the fiddling with exposure and ISOs. The D7000 is a complex, high performance camera which 90% of the time will provide perfect exposure and focus results. If it does not then it is most likely to be that you are not using the correct technique. Concentrate on your subject and composition firstly and then, and only then, start worrying that the camera is the limiting factor. Used properly the D7000 cannot be beaten, even by cameras costing very much more. Yours was a very good choice so let the camera do what it does well all by itself while it frees you to make pictures.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 333 334 335 336
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.