quixdraw wrote:
I have both a DF and D750, I regularly use and like both of them. On a completely subjective basis, the DF takes more colorful and attractive images for me, and I trust it more. In low light, the DF is superior. The manual controls are very simple to use and reduce menu use. With practice, all of the controls can easily be manipulated with one hand. Battery usage -- they are small and cheap -- I carry three. I have never had one run out because I switch before it becomes necessary. One card slot? Who cares -- I have never had one fail and I will never fill a 32, never mind a 64 -- cards are small as well, and I carry spares. Most of the long list of the DF's "lacks" are actually benefits. I will never take a movie, I hate touch screens, the swing out screen, hardly used,etc., etc. I have a pile of old Nikon glass which I use with both cameras. In terms of handling, size and attractiveness for me the DF wins by a mile. I don't regret picking up the used D 750, but though there are a list of advantages on paper, nearly all have been irrelevant or useless to me. If / when Nikon comes out with a DF 2, provided they don't add a lot of nonsense features, the D 750 will be on the block and I'll buy one.
I have both a DF and D750, I regularly use and lik... (
show quote)
A friend carries both a D4 and a D750. When I compare the images from both, to my eye the D4 wins every time. I use a D600 (the precursor to the 750) and would happily go to the smaller pixel count of a Df when I consider it is using the same senor as the D4. So, if Nikon should announce a DF2 with the new D5 sensor and it's processor, I will be one of those standing in line. Assuming of course that the image quality remains with the added resolution.