Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: AndyT
Page: <<prev 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 72 next>>
Oct 26, 2021 14:01:40   #
PHRubin wrote:
I got the ZS100 before I ever saw the 200 advertised. I use it often. The main feature is the 1" sensor, much better than the 1/2.3" in many bridge cameras, and it fits a (large) pocket.


Yeah, what PH said.
Go to
Oct 24, 2021 12:55:13   #
Yes, sadly they eliminate them to save money, and in some cases they just can't fit them in. This is my Panasonic Lumix ZS-100 and it has a viewfinder. The camera is pocket sized making the viewfinder tiny, but it does work and you can view your shots outside in the sun with it. Even has a 25-250mm lens in there. It's a great little camera.


Go to
Oct 22, 2021 10:24:41   #
BrentHarder wrote:
Actually you are right!


Nice set. The building is amazing (5). As you were bringing your camera up to your eye, did you say "Wow!"
Go to
Oct 18, 2021 11:19:11   #
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
I have no accurate statistics, however, I would make an educated guess that what with the advanced and sophisticated metering systems in today's digital cameras, the majority of photographers, including serious workers and professionals are not using or depending on handheld exposure meters. There are, however, a significant minority of photographers, including myself, who still find them particularly useful. while not excluding their cameras' internal systems, for many situations and specific applications. I have come to the obvious conclusion, after many years of expereince in calculating all kinds of exposure scenarios, that there is not one kind of meter, metering mode (incident, reflected, or spot metering, on one metering setting in your cameras' menu (spot, average, matrix. etc.) that can address all situations and scenarios or kinds of work at hand. Most importantly, even with the best and most versatile meter or camera in hand, the photographer's metering technique is the most essential component of attaining the correct and most accurate exposure.

Whether you are using your cameras' metering systems or a handheld exposure meter in an incident, reflected, or spot mode, the key to accurate or effective readings is knowing where and how to probe. Of course, there is the prescribed method, with the incident or light meters, to place the meter at the subject and point the lig collect dome at the camera. Theoretically, the come will collet and defuse or miss the light so that is still the subject for all the directions they came can see and an acceptable exposure should result. If, however, the photographer wishes to further analyze the scent or subject, set up lighting ratios in studios environments, measure the effectiveness of a reflector fill with natural or ambient light, measure the effect of a light sstrikomgthe subject for a more extreme angle of incidence, the incident light meter can also be used to make more isolated readings by the use of an interchangeable flat light receptor, a recessed dome, or simply by shading one or more aspects of the dome.

Some incident light metes, mostly older models. had an accessory grid that to would replace the dome and thereby simulate a perfect light meter. Other older mode reflects light meters had an accessory dome or inserts that would convert it for incident light readings. Those older meters were usually analog types with calculator dials that had compensatory markings for these conversions.

Regardless of the meter type you use, YOU are the operator and YOU must learn how to use it effectively. It is merely a light measuring instrument and as much as the manufactures and retailers like to call cameras and meters "intelligent"- they use that little italicized ("I") in the nameplate- your meter has no eyes and no brain. A stethoscope is an instrument that your doctor uses but he or she can't listen to your heart or lungs by placing the stethoscope on your knee. And, if you were not a health professional, you would not know what specific sounds to listen for even if you placed the instrument properly. The doctor would not use a sphygmomanometer to listen to your heart- that tool is for blood pressure measurement. Learn where and how to measure light and use the right meter or metering mode that is appropriate for the job at hand!

I have no accurate statistics, however, I would m... (show quote)


Got it. Thank you
Go to
Oct 18, 2021 11:12:39   #
Miamark wrote:
The manual for this meter expressly states in section 2.2 to point the meter from the subject towards the camera. That way you will be able to determine how much light is falling on the subject. The dome will provide the reading incidence of the light from the sky and other areas. If you point the meter to the sky or up, you will not get a correct reading and will mostly overexpose the shot. Since many meters can measure can measure flash exposure you still want to point the meter towards the camera as well and the dome will accommodate the correct exposure for the direction that the light is coming from. You do not point the flash function towards the flash unless the flash is on the camera.
The manual for this meter expressly states in sect... (show quote)


Thanks for replying. That's what I was leaning to.
Go to
Oct 17, 2021 10:21:11   #
While I was waiting for an oil change, I noticed a guy on a bike ride by out back on a trail I didn't know existed. So I took a walk. The last image was taken the night before.

Muted soft colors


A log, just waiting


X marks the spot


Remote off camera flash

Go to
Oct 17, 2021 09:49:18   #
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
Here is a link to your manual:

https://www.cameramanuals.org/flashes_meters/gossen_luna-pro_digital.pdf


thanks E.L.
Go to
Oct 17, 2021 09:48:24   #
imagemeister wrote:
I would swear, that in all my experience, I recall the idea of pointing the incident receptor towards the main light source ! ? - which is what I did. This idea seems to fulfill the whole concept of "incidence" ........
.


Thanks for your reply imagemeister
Go to
Oct 17, 2021 09:47:58   #
BebuLamar wrote:
The reason for putting the dome in such a position because:
1. It's an dual mode Reflected and Incident meter and using 1 photo cell. For an incident only meter they would put it on the front of the meter.
2. In the case of the Minolta in EL. post the measuring head can be turned for Incident or Reflective.
3. In the case of the Sekonic it seems to have 2 photocells or optic so that you can aim it differently for spot or incident.
4. The Luna Six is similar in design to your meter and thus you would have to do it the same way. If they put the dome in front of the meter then when reading reflective you're looking at the back of the meter rather than the display.
The reason for putting the dome in such a position... (show quote)


Thanks for your reply
Go to
Oct 17, 2021 09:47:07   #
Gene51 wrote:
Dome should be up, towards the main light falling on the subject. If the subject is getting sky light, the meter needs to read it.

That being said, incident meters are extremely effective in studio settings, or when you have control over the light, and in situations were you can place and read the meter in the same light as what is illuminating the subject.

They are close to useless shooting wildlife in a blind, a cityscape at night, a night sports event, a stage performance, a moon or night sky shot, etc etc etc. I have relied on reflected meter readings since 2006, but still own two hand-held analog Gossen combo incident/reflected meters that I "occasionally" use - a Lunapro and a Lunapro SBC, which has a flash attachment that works great for setting lighting ratios.
Dome should be up, towards the main light falling ... (show quote)


Thanks Gene
Go to
Oct 16, 2021 22:21:05   #
krl48 wrote:
This might be of some help - https://www.butkus.org/chinon/flashes_meters/gossen_luna-pro_digital_f/gossen_luna-pro_digital_f.htm


You nailed it krl48. It says in the manual with the dome in place it should be pointing back to the camera. Wish I could've found that manual from 10 yrs ago.
Go to
Oct 16, 2021 22:18:00   #
quixdraw wrote:
Been a while, but Incident meters the light falling on the subject, not reflected from. Hold with the dome facing up.


Thanks for replying quixdraw. I understand that using it as an incident meter reads the light falling on the subject. But my question is with all the other meters I see that have the dome, they are basically pointing back to the camera if held say under the persons chin. It would read the sky, the grass, and whats on either side. This meter is pointing to the sky and if held that way it doesnt seem like it would read as much as if it were pointing back to the camera.
Go to
Oct 16, 2021 12:55:54   #
If I can get an answer that I can use, I'm not afraid to ask a dumb question. Duck!...here come's one now!
I am used to in camera metering on a variety of cameras I've owned, but am interested in trying out incident rather than reflected meter readings. I understand the concept and the advantages of incident readings, but this particular meter I have raises a simple question. It is one of the few that I've seen that has the domed meter on top pointed up and not facing front. I have to assume that in order to get an accurate incident meter readings outdoors I have to tip the meter "down", and pointed towards the camera so to speak. Holding the meter under the subject's chin where you would actually be able to see the readout would cause an underexposure since the dome is reading more sky. Am I not understanding how an incident meter works?


Go to
Oct 8, 2021 17:06:50   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
I worked at 69 W Washington St, just the other side of the Daley Center for about 2 years starting in July 1990. Alas, my memory of that block and barber shop, if it did overlap for any period of time, is lost in the mists of memory ....


My dad owned and was very proud of that shop. I remember he used to tell me some of the famous people he gave haircuts to before they went downstairs to do their show. Sadly, I was a dumb teenager and didn't understand at the time what a great bonding moment that could've been with my dad. I lived in Chicago from birth till 5 yrs old, then we moved to Evanston and was there till I left for the AF at age 21. Keep meaning to go back, doubt I could find any landmarks still there now. I enjoy seeing your photographs of the city.
Go to
Oct 8, 2021 14:24:38   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Thank you Andy! It was probably the The Woods Theatre - a movie palace located at the corner of Randolph and Dearborn Streets in the Chicago Loop. It opened in 1918 and was a popular entertainment destination for decades. Originally a venue for live theater, it later converted to show movies. It closed in 1989 and was demolished in 1990. There's a new theatre there now in that block in the redevelopment, the Goodman Theater. The Chicago Theatre is one block over on State.


Ahhh, the Woods Theater. That makes sense. I'll have to continue looking online for a photo that shows the barber shop pole. Thanks very much.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 72 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.