Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: RodB
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
Oct 14, 2017 12:38:45   #
Get the Tokina 100mm f/2.8 AT-X M100 AF Pro D Macro Autofocus Lens for Nikon recommended by Ken Rockwell... I have used this lens and it is amazingly sharp... at much less money than the Nikon. Rockwell tested them all and I have never found his recommendations on stuff like this to be wrong. I bought this lens used for $350 and it was mint (many users do not use these lenses much). For critters that may get spooked or other scenarios where you need more subject to lens distance I also recommend the Nikon 200mm Medical Macro if you want the best tool and have the budget.


http://www.kenrockwell.com/tokina/100mm-f28.htm
Go to
Oct 14, 2017 12:22:53   #
tomcat wrote:
I have the 18-200 lens that I use for a walking around lens. It is not known for its acute sharpness, although it can be sharp at f/8 and high shutter speed. But it's convenient which is why I use it. Depending upon what type of lens you want, there are many good suggestions offered so far. My fav is now the Sigma Art series of lenses. Incredibly sharp.



I find the opposite is true from your comment [It is not known for its acute sharpness???] I realize there are good lenses in different manufacturing runs...but I have owned two Nikon 18-200 DX VR lenses and found both to be excellent in sharpness plus both have been able to photograph objects like a fly (for fly fishing) or say a dime with good results. I also own a 100mm macro but have used my 18-200 at f8 with good results. If I remember right, I upped the ISO on the macro shots, shot at f8 or f/11 and backed off a little with the camera to subject distance to achieve more depth of field. I enlarged the photo to the size I wanted and it was plenty sharp. My only criticism of the Nikon DX 18-200 VR is that it could be faster for action shots. The VR works great. Obviously fixed lenses are unequivocally the sharpest which is why I have 100mm macro and a 35mm f/1.8. BTW The Tokina 11-16 DX lens is equal to the Nikon and very sharp.
Go to
Oct 12, 2017 18:33:59   #
Really nice shots... great subjects.

Rod
Go to
Oct 12, 2017 15:12:28   #
Clauz wrote:
I am interested in obtaining a faster lens to use on my Nikon D7000.

Im thinking a little faster lens will sharpen uo my photos a bit and be a better lens for lower light.

Not sure if this thinking is correct, but Id like to know what you folks think.

Thank ahead of time.

Btw the way, most of my photos are landscapes, flowers, street photos....

Bruce


I'd recommend getting an 18-200 DX VR or VR2 (used about $300) the Vibration resistance allows you to get sharper photos and with increasing the ISO you can avoid buying an expensive large f/stop lens. The D7000 takes great pics and the 18-200 takes incredible photos and can focus close like a macro. Used lenses are usually in good shape.

The 35mm f/1.8 is about $200 and works great for low light situations.

More information than you likely want but will help you decide on a lens.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/dx-dream-team.htm
Go to
Oct 12, 2017 15:09:56   #
PatM wrote:
Hello Ladies and Germs,

I have Been taking photos using manual for a short period of time. I guess a couple months now. I went to a wedding this Sat. with our camera. I had a little hope that the skills I have been studying might show up in the photos I captured. Sadly it was an unhappy result. I was not doing this for anyone but my experience. Nobody was counting on me but me. Most all photos taken in auto were satisfactory to Good. Most of the manual focus photos I took were out of focus blurred or otherwise virtually unusable. When in live view the screen looked acceptable for taking but end result was not. I did not use a tripod at all as I did not want to interfere with the real photographer. I believe there was vibration or movement showing in some of the photos but not all and none when in auto. Needless to say I am disappointed that even a modicum of competence was not displayed in my endeavor. Lighting was horrible but not an excuse. Just venting frustration.
Have a good day
Hello Ladies and Germs, br br I have Been taking ... (show quote)



http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech.htm
Go to
Oct 12, 2017 14:20:38   #
Thomas902 wrote:
Rod the last image of your second set is totally at the next level... Lighting polished metal is truly a bear and you have skillfully achieved excellence here... Would love to see a lighting diagram of this image in as it has a marvelous degree of "specularity fade" to achieve an iconic look of a three-dimensional rendering... At an exposure duration of 1/10 second I'm assuming you are using continuous illumination here...

And the insert is such a touch of finesse to this lovely art work...

Looking forward to more of your stellar creativity here on UHH...

Again thank you for sharing...
I wish you well on your journey Rod...
Rod the last image of your second set is totally a... (show quote)


Thanks Thomas for your comments and interest. The pic of the Chisel set in a box was a shot for Traditional Woodworker, a mail order company that wanted higher quality shots for covers and webpage slots. The lighting set up is diagramed here as far as I can remember. Note the large sheet of tracing paper/velum that is hung to give a soft diffuse light source on a shiny subject...but that the light head is moved close enough to provide a brighter spot [For really soft light the light head can be just a small Chimera light box]. Obviously, the farther the light head is away from the diffusing material the more the uniformity of the soft light (note: lots of double fabric cloth light boxes are super soft today...but its hard to match tracing velum). To be honest, I don't remember on this shot if I was using a Chimera small pro box as the light source of a standard head with a reflector.

With digital imaging its easy to color correct when you put layers of materials in front of lights... historically we had to shoot film and color test before shooting projects.

One final note... when photographing shiny metal many times small pieces of transparent materials can be placed between the light source and the "too bright specular area" to diffuse it but not block the light completely. An example of this would be using a p4x8 piece of a translucent milk jug as a gobo. A Gobo is any piece of material that you use to block light, white, black or translucent.

R


(Download)
Go to
Oct 12, 2017 13:17:45   #
Lance Pearson wrote:
I enjoy the photos you have. I looked at the exif data on the wooden block shot and noticed you had cranked in a strong negative -1.3 of e.v. Is that something you often do? I tend to shoot my nikon d4 at -0.3 and on strong colors like a single color flower -1.0 e.v.

what's your philosophy on using that much - e.v. or is it a function of how your sensor on that camera works best? Trying to learn from someone who has great images.

Thanks again for posting and answering.

Lance Pearson
I enjoy the photos you have. I looked at the exif... (show quote)


I 'm usually viewing RGB Histograms and want to be sure I have usable data... I adjust e v if necessary to achieve a detailed image that I know
Photoshop will deal with nuance changes later. When shooting important images its vital to know you have the information without any loss in the highlights or the deep shadows.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/yrgb.htm
Go to
Oct 12, 2017 02:17:21   #
Thomas902 wrote:
Rod here is the exact same kit (Nikon D300 with the 18.0-200.0 mm f/3.5-5.6 lense) at 170.0mm (35mm equivalent: 255mm); F/14; 1/200 second; ISO 200...

Bridal Makeup Trial Session.... Illumination was with a Beauty Dish and two strip softbox kickers...
Yep, I booked the client... Lovely event... Beautiful bride...

That decade old piece of kit is totally awesome! As you are well aware...

Again thank you for sharing your "Product" artistry...
You are indeed a master of your craft Rod...
Rod here is the exact same kit (Nikon D300 with th... (show quote)


Thomas, thanks for the complements. BTW, these images were shot hi quality jpg, not raw. This shows the type of work people can do with a decent camera and good lenses.

I like your work too. Nice bridal shot. Remember, the lenses make the difference. I will upgrade in the future but I still haven't seen the camera I would change up to from my D300S. The D7500 would take about as good of photos as the FX cameras but I like the pro cameras with the external controls and the D500 left out some features and costs too much.
Later

RB


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Oct 12, 2017 01:43:46   #
twiceeagles wrote:
Both of you, Rod and Thomas, do beautiful work. This is some quality work. This shows that you don't have to have a gazillion mega pixels and a $6,000 camera to do awesome work.



Thanks for the comments. I use photoshop on most images... It makes a difference.

RodB
Go to
Oct 12, 2017 01:22:58   #
Curl wrote:
This is my first attempt at lighting stemware. I am backlighting with a softbox and have some additional diffusion material between the softbox and the glasses.
I am a little concerned about the amount of shadow I am getting on the side of the glasses but I'm not sure if there is anything I can do about it.
I welcome any suggestions for improvement please.

Thank you in advance for helping me out.

Curl



Glass photography can be difficult... it takes some messing around even with the best starting setup. I hope my comments on the pic help some.

Rod B


(Download)
Go to
Oct 12, 2017 01:19:35   #
Curl wrote:
This is my first attempt at lighting stemware. I am backlighting with a softbox and have some additional diffusion material between the softbox and the glasses.
I am a little concerned about the amount of shadow I am getting on the side of the glasses but I'm not sure if there is anything I can do about it.
I welcome any suggestions for improvement please.

Thank you in advance for helping me out.

Curl


I hope this will help... glass photography can be difficult...

RodB


(Download)
Go to
Oct 11, 2017 21:39:31   #
Bill_de wrote:
Commercial and Industrial Photography is one of the sections on this site. They might be interested in having you as a member. If you go the the all section list, they are near the bottom.

--



I didn't see that on the create new topics list... thanks... I'll remember that. Can I change this category?
Go to
Oct 11, 2017 21:01:01   #
As a retired advertising photographer I have found good use for photography to document work in boatbuilding/repair... and to sell items on the internet. I have found that quality images can really make a difference on sites like eBay when selling restored hand planes when asking significant prices for the labor to produce such items. I thought some of these photos might be of interest to this forum simply because of their effectiveness on eBay.

The following were images of different planes that I restored from old somewhat rusty originals along with several modifications to improve performance. I used a background and lighting to emphasize the features of the restorations and to aid in getting top prices for said items. The background was the blue fabric or from a roll of white paper. The lighting was on a bright cloudy day with some fill cards and photoshop made them more impactful. I don't know if anyone is interested in product photography but these are some of my most recent shots and I thought I'd share.

The final photo was using a wide angle (11-16 ) to document the finished non-skid on the deck of a sailboat for my website.

RodB


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)




(Download)
Go to
Oct 11, 2017 19:46:08   #
IBM wrote:
Good god man ,get a hold of your self ,you can get much better info on any photo site for free , no one ask for hand outs like Rock well, , they are there for the picking , if your sucked into Rockwell sobbe it


Relax... don't be so fast to condemn a website you may not know much about. Rockwell maintains a high level of expertise and knowledge for a living and does a great job in laying out the necessary data that the majority of people would require to make a purchasing decision. Since I have shot professionally for many years I am in the position to judge such things. I have recommended Ken Rockwell to scores of people who want to know how much camera they need and whats the best bang for the buck used or new. I have never found his advise to not be "right on" and therefore recommend his website. If you don't want to send him some money on paypal, its not required. I feel the advise and "comparisons" he supplies are great resources for most people trying to figure out what equipment to buy within their personal budget.

Have a nice day.
RodB
Go to
Oct 11, 2017 19:04:14   #
Thanks.... I'll keep browsing this website and contribute now and then...

RodB
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.