Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: zenagain
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12 next>>
Jul 29, 2021 07:17:11   #
tradio wrote:
My old blue jeans...




Blue Jean Blues.....
Go to
Jun 15, 2021 07:40:04   #
Check out "Painted Mines Interpretive Park".
Just outside of Colorado Springs. Place is awesome and free.
Try to go at sunrise or sunset, the colors are much brighter when they are slightly shaded.
Go to
Jun 15, 2021 07:12:02   #
I had the same problem. Bought another pair of glasses (clear) and use a set of the old clip on flip up sunglasses. Works great for me.
Go to
May 28, 2021 07:36:18   #
Maybe the Mug of a Slug.....
Go to
May 28, 2021 05:55:23   #
Snail eye?
Go to
May 1, 2021 08:48:35   #
I rented and/or borrowed the Tamron, the Nikkor and both the C and S versions of the Sigma. Went with the Tamron and do not have a single regret. However every one of these lenses have good IQ, and do not have any real drawbacks. I just happened to prefer the Tamron.
Rent both of them.
I use it on both a D810 and D7200 get nice results on both.
You will enjoy either.
Go to
Apr 15, 2021 16:42:50   #
Goldfinch.
Used to have hundreds of them around our feeders when i lived in S.E. Kansas.
State Bird of NJ.
Go to
Feb 26, 2021 10:46:06   #
I have the Tamron 150-600g2 use it on a D7200 & D810. I love it. I have only had it a little over a year, but i have found nothing i dont like.
I also have the 1.4 ii tele. But dont use it. I have everything covered (lens wise) so do not need to use it. Not sure about using a tele. on the G2, mine will not work on it.
Go to
Feb 23, 2021 12:40:14   #
You got a lot of very good advise. The one thing i am surprised about though.
NEVER used compressed air!!,
The air pressure is to powerful and can actually blow particals of dust into the lens body.
I have used it to blow dust off of my tripod, maybe even a camera body from a distance, but if ya use it be careful.
Go to
Feb 20, 2021 07:51:02   #
After reading this, i feel like im just a

"point and shoot monkey" to you all.

But really after reading all the posts and going to the site selmslie posted and reading more i do now understand and have learned something today.
Thanks for cramping up my brain.

Thank you for all the monkeyed down explanations. Not something i see myself running out and using but very interesting stuff.

I think i am changing my username to
"Pointnshootmonkey"
Go to
Feb 19, 2021 11:09:08   #
Gene51 wrote:
Other than the consideration that a wealthy client just may have a higher standard of performance and be more demanding. With a wealthy client I would have no hesitation to consider that and work it into a quote, or just quote an hourly rate plus T&E. There is a difference between doing a wedding, for instance, for a young couple of modest means doing a home wedding with a few friends and family on the guest list with a DJ for entertainment, and a high society wedding at a local country club with live entertainment and 450 guests. I have done both and there is a world of difference in client expectations and budget - and yes, the CC wedding will cost 10X what the small modest wedding will cost. And that would all be based on assumed wealth and all of the corresponding factors. No scam, just solidly good business sense. I am shocked that you would have a problem with this.
Other than the consideration that a wealthy client... (show quote)


I used to own a security company, i dealt with very rich clients as well as very poor. And I never took advantage of the wealthier ones with an inflated price. All parts where priced the same, all hourly rates where the same, many times i had to double the hours required but that was based on the time and difficulty of the jobs.
If a person delivers the same product with the same difficult levels with different prices depending upon there wealth, that is just wrong.
I understand what you are saying, but that is a lot different than just deciding to charge a person more for the same product because they have more money. If you put in more work and have a higher expectation from the client then sure a higher price would be expected. But jobs being equal prices must be equal.
OP says to charge more just for the simple fact that they have more.
That i can not agree with.
Go to
Feb 19, 2021 09:13:25   #
Its nice to see you are more than a walking ad for mirrorless cameras.

Ok just kidding with ya.

Nice images, and thanks for sharing your process.

Also thank you for being part of the solution to pet over population. All of our dogs have been rescues.
Being a responsable pet owner makes up for being such a mirrorless minion.
Lol...sorry...sorta.
DSLR for life!!!!🤣
Go to
Feb 19, 2021 07:38:13   #
I cheaped out on a gimbal, so cheap it does not have a name on it.
It was so stiff it was unusable. I disassembled it and found grease so heavy it should have been used in train car bearings.
I removed the grease,(had to boil it out) replaced with a lighter lithium grease and it works, um, like it should now...i guess. It now resides in my "WTF was I thinking box".
Go to
Feb 19, 2021 07:29:57   #
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Go to
Feb 19, 2021 07:27:06   #
quixdraw wrote:
Reiterating - an accusation by the OP about my political orientation, humorous, and my response, were censored by whomever. Point of fact, a stacked deck. Changing what you charge vs. usual rates based on the wealth of the customer is ethically unsupportable, and probably unlawful. If you do that you are not someone I would do business with. Imagine, installation of a new toilet, and its price, being more costly if you are well off. Clown show.


🤡🤡🤡🤡👍👍👍👍👍
I would love to see the response you mentioned.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.