Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: unlucky2
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 30 next>>
Jan 9, 2021 11:03:15   #
uhaas2009 wrote:
πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘


Thanks for the thumbs up uhaas2009
Go to
Jan 9, 2021 11:01:14   #
hcmcdole wrote:
George Lepp did something similar years ago with a Canon 1D, a 600mm and two 2x TC and wrote his column in Outdoor Photography (or Popular Photography). But then he gets a lot of those goodies from Canon I believe to test out. Okay I was wrong. It was 500mm. Here is the article.

https://www.outdoorphotographer.com/pro-perspectives/george-lepp/keeping-your-distance-claiming-your-space/


Thanks for the reply and the link hcmcdole, I can only wish for a 500 f4. Regis has shown the R5 with a 800 /f11 + 2X = 1600 to be excellent IQ hand held, with auto focus. My rather silly attempt would be the poor man's special.
Go to
Jan 8, 2021 23:19:33   #
Paul J. Svetlik wrote:
The long telephotos are in our time less and less convenient for bird and sometimes even for animal photography - especially when we can use remote control cameras and much shorter focal lengths giving us a better quality images.
The heat shimmer, the weight of such big lenses on long hikes, difficulty to handle and properly focus make those expensive optics useable only for some special aplications.
However, they look awesome in a crowd! LOL.


I do not know of a remote control camera that can render better IQ than that which is shown. I do not see this set up as expensive. A 400mm f/5.6 costs less than $800, Yongnuo 2X tc less than $200, a Canon extension tube less than $60 and a Canon 1.4 less than $300 total $1360. Useful or practical not really, but 1200mm made from parts most have in their kit already. If you find yourself in a situation where more "reach" is required, don't be afraid of throwing it all together. Of course by the time you assemble all the parts, you will be searching for the location where your subject was. I just can't bring myself to part with $12K for an 800 5.6, and for some reason the wife thinks we need a new car more than a R5 with a RF 800 and a RF 2x.
Go to
Jan 8, 2021 14:06:54   #
bleirer wrote:
Do you lose infinity with a setup like that?


I did not. Heat shimmer was not a noticeable problem either (winter temps bring cool clear air here) Noise on the other hand is a problem. The strength of noise reduction required destroys the detail I look for with the 5DSR.
Go to
Jan 8, 2021 11:57:17   #
quixdraw wrote:
I did some experimentation back in August at 1800mm (35mm equivalent) Nikkor 600mm 5.6 with a 2x extender on a D7200. Workable with good light, if a bit clumsy. The problem encountered using it at distance was the heat shimmer. I found the posts, added a shot of the camera all set up. I will undoubtedly revisit the experiment when weather improves.

Edit- Camera photo added


Thanks for replying quixdraw, and a bit clumsy I must agree. I must have missed your post last August. If I try again it will be from a tripod.
Go to
Jan 8, 2021 11:07:18   #
Ever wonder what stacked "TC" would look like? I did. Knowing this setup will be manual focus and will need lots of light, I wondered if this setup could be used in the field, hand held. A week ago or so someone posted something about doing this, but there were no photo's included. This post includes a couple of pic's at 1200mm and one at 400mm cropped to match for comparison.

This setup is 400 5.6 + 2 tc + 12mm extension tube + 1.4 tc = 1200mm f11 or so the camera says (400 5.6 + 2x is f11 add another loss for the 1.4 resulting in f14 or there about). The camera data records this as 800mm f11. I tried to do this using my 100 - 400 mkll resulting in camera error (loss of contact with the lens). Conventional wisdom supports loss of IQ using a TC and noticeable loss of IQ using a 2X. Then there is the manual focus thing and the magnification of camera shake at 1200mm. None of these problems reared their ugly head, but the light meter missed its mark overexposing by enough to blow highlights. These images were captured Raw and after adjusting for exposure exported to jpeg using photoshop. It should be noted here, this is not a definitive comparison, only the result of my minimal effort.

A fun little experiment, but for me 400mm and crop. 1200mm is a very narrow field of view resulting difficulty in acquiring the subject and auto focus is sooo much faster.

the setup

(Download)

Western Blue Bird 1200mm hand held manual focus

(Download)

Western Blue Bird 400mm hand held autofocus and cropped to match

(Download)

Western Blue Bird in the shadow of a tree, 1200mm hand held manual focus

(Download)
Go to
Dec 9, 2020 16:41:00   #
But...did you catch any fish?.... Best wishes have merry Christmas and recover soon
Go to
Dec 7, 2020 15:40:05   #
fstoprookie wrote:
Just had a review from CDC that less than 6% of the total number of deaths in the United States attributed to COVID-19 were really caused by Covid-19. The hospitals get a 20% bonus for attributing the death to Covid 19. Gee, I wonder who got that bonus put into law or rule? so that means that ANYONE that enters the hospital with ANY other serious disease and dies is considered a death from Covid-19.


And that is just not true. Good old right wing lies. How about posting a link to that CDC review.
Go to
Dec 5, 2020 18:12:00   #
chrissybabe wrote:
This is wrong. You are saying there is a difference between the way an older user might use the disk and a younger user. If it is smarter and safer for an older user then why isn't it the same for a younger user ?
When you copy the disks over you have 6 file systems - 1 for each disk and any one of them easily corruptible on top of which you have 6 partitions any one of which could easily lose its partition table.
In the last 10 years all my disk losses have affected the entire disk so makes no difference whether you have partitions or not.
I cannot see why having a partition called Disk2015 is any different than having a file called Disk2015. I will concede that this does mean your final file destination does have an additional 7 characters added to it (Disk2015/) but other than this no other issue.
If you are copying over Disk2015 I suspect that almost all users probably never go back into the old files anyway so far more important that you make a second copy as well as keeping the older disks as a third backup.
I think that you are projecting something that you have used probably for a very long period (partitions) as still being the best way to do things.
This is wrong. You are saying there is a differenc... (show quote)


Have you ever made an error when using the erase command? You do not see older users as being more prone to making mistakes than younger users(referencing teck in general and data manipulation in particular)? Your response indicates to me that you are swimming in the apple world, not floundering in the windows pond. My impression from the OP's writing was that he uses Windows. Disk Manager make partitioning of a large disk very simple, and disk copy with ec checked makes coping the files a piece of cake. If interrupted for any reason it is straight forward to return and pickup where you left off. When connected the external drive's directory tree will appear the same as if all the older drives were connected and the pictures will be where you left them. The safety I refer to is the layer of protection from user error not drive failure. Anybody can mess-up anything anytime, partitioning confines the damage. The other big advantage is speed. NTDS stores data bits all over the drive requiring extensive drive head movement. Partitioning confines the area available thus limiting head travel and increasing read/right times noticeable. Of course the down side of this running out of room on a drive, which is why I recommend making the partitions/drives a bit bigger than the HD's he wants to consolidate.
Go to
Dec 5, 2020 11:09:36   #
DirtFarmer wrote:
If the disk fails, all the partitions are gone.

The smarter solution for everyone is to buy two or more of the larger disks, use the file structure to separate the data from separate disks and have several duplicates of your backup. And use the cloud for backup backup.


The original question was how to put all the data in one place (in this case a large drive) instead of multiple locations (numerous external drives). The old drives remain intact as part of a safety system. The use of partition on the large drive has several advantages over the use of a file system, speed and safety are the main ones. Absolutely a raid is a better way, but that was not the question. Leaving the original disks intact mitigates the risk of data loss some what, and the use of partition over file system enhances use. Limiting head travel speed's up data retrieval and partitioning is the way to accomplish this. Use the file system method and spread data all over the drive, resulting in more head travel. Remember the trick of partitioning the core track and sector's for near ssd speeds.
Go to
Dec 5, 2020 10:27:36   #
chrissybabe wrote:
I wouldn't use partitions. It just introduces another level of stuff that can go wrong. And uses up drive letters unnecesarily. Just create a file structure called Disk2015, Disk2016 etc.
There is absolutely no reason at all, I mean NONE, to create partitions. I haven't used partitions in 20 years.


Except for the fact that file structure is easily corruptible, and prone to user error, you are correct. The smarter and safer method especially for older users is to partition.
Go to
Dec 4, 2020 20:56:26   #
petercbrandt wrote:
I just bought a 5 Tb external hard drive for the purpose of dupping from other old hard drives so that 'age' and advanced technology doesn't interfere with keeping those images.
Next week I will start and I'm hoping that as I transfer each H.D. icon onto the new H.D., that each old H.D. will stay independent. My expectation is to see 6 different icons on the first page of opening the new H.D.

I have never tried this before. Over time I kept buying a newer backup drive.
When searching for an old photo, rather than attaching every h.d. independently looking for an image, they will all be on one drive.

Do you guys think my logic right ?

PS: I do not like the cloud stuff. I've heard so many people complaining that loading up is OK, but downloading back to your computer is a pain, a long time pain.
I just bought a 5 Tb external hard drive for the p... (show quote)


If I understand what you want to do: I would use the partition command to create partitions a bit bigger than the drives you plan to copy . All your older stuff backed up/ copied to the new drive. everything in one place.
Go to
Nov 25, 2020 16:28:19   #
be sure you are printing on the correct side of the paper!!!
Go to
Oct 28, 2020 18:12:27   #
very good pic Sinewsworn, Look at the beak not a seed eater beak. If you look again at the sparrow in Merlin you notice the seed eater beak. You have a very good picture of a Kinglet . Better than most.
Go to
Sep 19, 2020 20:46:16   #
lhammer43 wrote:
We have reached the end of this week so to start the next week again………


My second attempt at a Challenge free Sunday, maybe some of these from last week will be acceptable.

My oldest son was glad to see me......

(Download)

Turkey vulture in tree inspired the message

(Download)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 30 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.