Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: btbg
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 609 next>>
Apr 25, 2024 10:12:41   #
Texcaster wrote:
Yes, way overreacted! Israel will be ostracized for decades.
Steve - "I don't think you realize the size of the October attack as well as the hostages that not only were taken but raped and tortured." This isn't secret news. It was raw barbarism! Everybody gets that.


Then why do you say Israel has overacted? What should they have done?

Look what we did after 9 11. We shoild be supporting Israels right to defend themselves.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 23:18:28   #
DennyT wrote:
Israel is an ally.. tell me what have them done for us. Guess you forgot the. USS Liberty.


What have any of our allies done for us? Look at the Ukraine conflict for example our allies are not supporting Ukraine to help us. They are supporting Ukraine because it is in their best interest to do so. Allies are allies because they have common enemies and or common goals. Would you rather we ally with Iran where people regularly shout death th the little satan and death to the big satan?
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 22:58:47   #
DennyT wrote:
No !!! When ever you are back in a corner you scream “ anti semite”.
No much different than when some one speaks ill of trump you scream “ liberal “

Equally dumb !!


Well you are siding with terrorists over Israel what would a logical person conclude that makes you?
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 22:56:26   #
DennyT wrote:
Hah !!! Israeli leadership had made one thing clear , they want all Palestinian out of GAZA period. That is proven in the peace negotiations Where the Israeli took the position they would not palest return to their hones in norther Gaza.


You really dont get it do you. If they allow Palestinians to go back north then Hamas will go back north too.

Until Hamas is totally destroyed they cant let Palestinians go back north.

Ask yourself this one question, if the Palestinian people are not bad but only their leadership tjen why do both Jordan and Egypt reduse to take them?

I repeat more than 70 percent of the Palastinians v**ed for Hamas and they still support them. That and the aboxe question should tell you all yoi need to know.

You seem to forget that Israel is smaller than New Jersey and have taken constant daily rocket attacks for years. Blaming a nation where Germany tried to erradicate the entire race and no one wanted them for fighting for their survival is just plain nuts.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 22:40:07   #
DennyT wrote:
You proved you have no clue when you call Israel
An “ ally “.


They are an ally. You think Ukraine ia an ally because they are fighting Russia. Well Israel is fighting both Hamas and Iran so that makes them our ally..
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 22:37:37   #
imagemeister wrote:
My conclusion from this excercise is :

1. I would NEVER consider using more the one TC at a time - especially at this time in the digital era.
2. If I were using a 2X TC hand held, I would be using as much bracing/stabilizing as I could muster.....AND, I would not be using in a low light situation or where the subject was briskly moving - for AF concerns.
3. Today, If pressed, I will use an APSC camera, with a 1.4X TC and CROP and use pixel enlargement software - in stead of a 2X. Only in a a very serious/desperate situation and in bright near-direct sun would I consider a 2X ......do I have a 2X ? - Yes, Canon III version - have I used it ? Yes - with the 400 DO.

Years ago, I very happily used the 2X II with the Canon 300 2.8 - BEFORE high MP cropping and pixel enlargement software.
.
My conclusion from this excercise is : br br 1. I... (show quote)


I appreciate your oppinion. Historically I would agree with you about stacking tcs but Nikon says that you can sta k the vuilt in tcs on both their 400 and their 600 S lenses.

As to not hand holding thats great. Only thing is a huge number of sports photographers I know hand hold, so its what I'm used to.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 22:32:52   #
texasdigital wrote:
This brings up multiple talking points.
1. Suits ... many have the degrees but lack what my Granny was famous for saying. All the education in the world doesn't do any good if you don't have horse sense.
2. Three hours under a car, during an active shooting and your paper (I refrain from including "news"), makes you eat the photos. Maybe you should have shopped them to other news outlets.
3. For how long was his mental illness known? Had he shot and killed a policeman, depriving his wife and kids of a husband and father, would his mental illness excuse his behavior?
4. Did discussing his mental illness solve any of the problems created by this individual?
5. I find it disturbing to give publicity to the family (via photographs and story), when it is most likely they knew of his condition and most likely protected him.
6. If he suffered from mental illness, how did he get a gun? Since it is apparent the family knew about his condition, what did they do to prevent him from having access to a gun?
7. It would not have been you embarrassing the shooter, his family did that for him.

We have a local newspaper that has gone through many transformations, but few of them included an appreciation for photography unless it was sports. They had to do that since football is a religion in Texas. But other than that, they wouldn't be able to spell "photojournalism", much less define it.
This brings up multiple talking points. br 1. Sui... (show quote)


You raise some interesting points.

First he didnt get a gun, he got a compound bow. Bow hunting is big here.

Second no one got shot, he missed when he shot at the police when he came out and two officers tackled him.

Third what caused his mental break was he was being evicted from his home even though he was currwnt on his rent.

Fourth it turns out that hos family had come in to try to get the paper to do a story a couple weeks earlier about both his upcoming eviction and his mental illness.

That makes things a little different. My photos are of him drawing and firing the bow as two officers who were on each side of the door tackled him.

Thing is I think they might have made the right choice if it helped even one other family with mental illness.

As to shopping photos around there isnt a very big market around here and no one else even ran the story of the police arresting him.

One of the things I have learned is that photographing crimes and accidents is not always appreciated and it is not always cut and dried what should or should not go in print.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 21:46:27   #
DennyT wrote:
Don’t you think Israel should do
To protect innocent women and children ? There’re certainly no trying .


I asked you what Israel should do and you said I don't know, so I will trust that Israeli leadershilis doing their best.

You keep ignorring that Hamas hides amongst women and children. Thats on Hamas not Israel.

I support eradicating terrorists especially those who rape and tortue women and children. If there are civilian casualties thats to bad, especially since the Palestinians continue to support Hamas. If the Palestinians really wanted peace and prosperity they would help Israel root out terrorism instead of participating in it.

I feel very sorry for the small group of Palestinian Christians because they are being hirt by both sides, but the rest of Palestine this is all on them.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 19:18:28   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
I've been following this discussion. At 9-pages, we see many of the comments seem to come from people who don't actively shoot wildlife and / or don't use these lens 'extender' tools.

The reworking of your image added nothing. "More" software is unneeded. The idea for manual focus for wildlife is nonsensical for AF-capable equipment in 2024. Anyone looking closely at the second image will see extremely sharp details of the misplaced focus on the grass seeds in the foreground and the missed focus on the bird (subject). Here, the photographer -- the human in the equation -- needs to selectively place a single AF point on the bird's eye.

Both images seem to have opportunities to re-process from an original RAW file to obtain different and sharper results. The first image retains a lot of Luminance noise in the blue sky, as well as some odd 'smudges' in that solid blue sky, suggesting an incomplete removal of other aspects of the original image. The details of the second image show a heavier hand in the noise processing, likely removing many of the fine details of the original image.

Personally, I regularly use and rely on my Canon EF 2.0x vIII 'extender' (aka teleconverter). In this bright light on well-lit subjects, I'm confident even better results can be obtained simply with different processing of RAW files from this lens, extender and mirrorless digital body.
I've been following this discussion. At 9-pages, w... (show quote)


Thanks for the comments. I think you are probably right on the money with your comments. I did remove a cattail, and I probably miss focus by small amounts regularily because my eyesigjt isnt what ot once was and we are not working with a lot of depth of foeld.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 18:31:46   #
Fredstersphotos wrote:
If you blow your image up 100% there is a ton of of artifacts in it I downloaded your image took it into Topaz Labs Photo AI Enhanced it, removed the noise, then sharpened it you will have to agree it is much sharper.


I dont own Topaz but thanks.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 16:46:35   #
ricardo00 wrote:
As I said above the picture "this is the foot that comes with the $3200 Nikon 400mm f/4.5 lens". This is a fairly new lens. Which lens are you talking about?


I have the 70-200 2.8 s lens and the 400 f2.8, plus I have a Sigma 150-600 sport kens. All have better feet than the one you showed. I would probably either not buy that kens or buy an after markwt foot because I agree with you, there is no excuse for that foot.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 15:44:19   #
texasdigital wrote:
Until I retired, I was a crime scene photographer. We may have more in common than most.


Could be. Not sure I would want that job. About 7 years ago I soent 3 hours under a car because I was sent to shoot a police stand off with an armwd subject and that was the only place I could find where i was behind the police barracades but still in sight. I'm sure if they had seen me they would have made me move. Anyway I got the shots and then the family of the individual came into the paper to discuss his mental illness and what ked to his mental break and they chose to run a news story and a feature story about mentall illnesss without the photos i took. Instead they had me go with a news reporter to shoot the family whe they talked to them about mental illness. On the one had I was glad because I certainly didn't want to imbarrass the individual, who it turned out I knew, but on the other hand they would have been award winning photos.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 15:35:48   #
ialvarez50 wrote:
The pictures are ok, you need to focus better. The first bird. The tails are sharp but not the head, secon bird much the same. Probably manual focusing or select a focusing spot on the head of the bird.
My two cents.


You could be right about the focus. Manual focus wouldn't help as the photos are cropped and Im doing good just to get a focus point on the birds.

I know that the bird photographers here spend a lot of time and energy getting their photos. I did not. I shot these specifically because of an earlier discussion about converters and I wanted to here from both sides. I have found the conversation to be interesting and possibly informative. I went to a location deliberately where it is impossibke to get close to the birds because of fencing and water. It is a man made wildlife refuge that is a series of ten holding ponds created to take treated sewage water and allow it to settle even further before the water retuens to a river. They have planted natural grasses and other plants that attract birds have about 10 miles of hiking trails around the ponds. Over the past 6 or 7 years they have started getting more and more species of birds. I go out there for exercise and take my camera along just in case. Last week I just decided to do this because of the converter discussion. Onky way to shoot heee is go really big or crop like crazy, cant set up blinds and ecen if you did someone with a dog or with kittle kids on bikes willbcome aroundbthe pavedbportiin of the trails and spook any birds that got even close to the trails, so its great for hiking and bird watching, but not for bird photography, making it a perfect location to try out teleconverters.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 15:22:34   #
DennyT wrote:
The deal that Obama and other nations entered into with Iran had a single purpose to stop irans nuclear proliferation. It was working.
Trump back out no because of anything to do within irans nuc program.
He back out because it did not have any impact on any of irans “ other “ activities. And because he wanted to away with anything associated with Obama - good or bad !!


That is totally bogus. The deal they entered into delayed Iran for 10 years but got rid of the sanctions so at the end of the 10 years they could go back to work on their nuclear program but now with more money.

Thebother countries involved wanted Irans oil and didn't care what happened later.

Obama did the typical lefty thing kick the can down the road so that the problem doesn't happen while they are in power and they can blame it on someone else later instead of fixing the probelm to begin with. Go back and look at all tje stories from when the original deal was made and look at all tje articles warning about what was going to happen later.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 15:16:24   #
DennyT wrote:
Who is the “ them” you refer to .


Hamas, who do you think I was talking about. It is Hamas that is building their infrastructure under and in schools and hospitals and it is Hamas that is hiding behind women and children. DUH!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 609 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.