pendennis wrote:
You're making a baseless assumption, and you lack reason in your response. Science is not on your side. Therefore, your argument is fatally flawed, without any logic, and totally emotional.
A woman, without any medical condition to the contrary, has tacitly agreed to carry a child to term when she and a man have consensual sexual relations. The fact that she may have "buyer's remorse", is not a reason to terminate the life of a child. Any arguments to the contrary deny the inherent rights of a defenseless human being. That that human can't survive outside the womb until late in the term is beside the point. The couple has made a moral decision to create a new life, and therefore must ensure that new life survives and thrives.
Women have been carrying infants to term without "unwarranted risk to health and life" for hundreds of thousands of years. Pregnancy is a process, and it does contain risks. The "come lately" argument you present is nonsensical on its face. If the woman has been impregnated as a result of rape, incest, etc., then all bets are off.
You're making a baseless assumption, and you lack ... (
show quote)
Women have been dying from pregnancy, and it is unwarranted if the woman doesn’t want it.
A fetus is not a child.
I can return nearly anything I purchase.
There is no logic to allowing a******n in the event of rape or incest, but not allowing it for other reasons. The penultimate reason is that the woman doesn’t want it.