Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Posts for: cabunit
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 67 next>>
Jan 3, 2019 16:10:21   #
3, 4, and 5 work quite nicely on their own! But perhaps the story needs 1 and 2.... Good work!
Go to
Jan 3, 2019 15:55:31   #
Wish I'd seen this thread earlier. I'm a few days behind. Also have an 850 and am interested in the same lens/adapter combo. I've had scans done by an outfit that actually uses a high-res DSLR and prefer them to any scans I've had done by an actual scanner at lower res. Am doing my slides with them to save time, but they don't offer the same res (about 7500x5000) on b&w negs, hence the thought about the 850. Curious if you've done any comparisons either with your own scanner or with a service. Thanks!
Go to
Dec 28, 2018 14:54:15   #
The backlit tree and the clouds are most enjoyable!
Go to
Dec 28, 2018 14:52:08   #
Yes, lots of fun in the sequence. Were they mine I might consider flipping the landing shots horizontally and then printing them 1-2-3 in a row left to right. That way the ducks would be facing the same direction as they were viewed. Just a thought. Very cool in any case.
Go to
Dec 28, 2018 14:42:50   #
A wonderful moment for us to enjoy! Even the duck is drooling over it!
Go to
Dec 22, 2018 09:31:57   #
Great playground y'all have out there. Thanks for giving us such gorgeously executed views now and then.
Go to
Dec 14, 2018 15:48:15   #
Yes, ditto what Shellback said. Lightroom is invaluable in its capacity to add keywords to your images.

However, if for one reason or another you don't have LR, your approach sounds reasonable, given that "wildlife" could have LOTs of subjects. It boils down to what feels right for you. What's the best way for you to retrieve that heron (or bison, or butterfly, or...) shot you made six years ago? Year? Location? Do you have your best shots saved separately?

As for keepers, I try to be rigorous and simply toss anything I'll never want to do anything with. As Scott Kelby says, and I paraphrase, if it's a two-star or a three-star (out of five) do you really need it any more? Even so, I likely keep two or three times what I should. Good luck!
Go to
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Dec 13, 2018 14:16:58   #
EDIT: Sorry--had not seen the one just above before I posted.

One I remember:

He lit a match
To see gas tank
That's why they call him
Skinless Frank

(You rarely hear the phrase "skinless frank" any more, but they're still out there.)
Go to
Dec 4, 2018 14:03:14   #
Red Ball Express, maybe?
Go to
Dec 4, 2018 12:45:25   #
Cany143 wrote:
Thanks for your comment, cab....How about you?


Appreciate your time, and all the history, Cany!

I simply assumed--I should know better by now--that it was a recent image, and was therefore curious why you'd "gone back," as it were, to film. I have a couple of on-line friends who still shoot film from time to time, typically b&w, and apart from the "cool" factor, I've never divined what was better about spending all that time and effort, especially if most folks will only ever see a digitized version. Was thinking you might shed some light. I could never do direct comparisons myself because I abandoned darkroom work with the advent of digital.

I was a train freak as a kid, and taught myself photography by trial and error at trackside, starting some 55 years ago. Eventually I set up a b&w darkroom, which immediately taught me about negative density, contrast, blown highlights, and lousy shadow detail (which I seemed to be good at...). While once in a while by chance I'd take a decent photo, 99.9% of this was documentary. I don't think that back then I was ever at the point where, as you describe, I would have appreciated the subtleties of different developing for individual film sheets, although a friend and I shared a medium format Mamiya, and the differences in those prints over 35mm, just in detail and tone, was, as you say, legion.

I also took a lot of Kodachrome, and at some point found a color enlarger head and tried Cibachrome. Wow, was THAT frustrating. The reflected-light prints, of course, never looked so good as the projected slides, but I kept trying anyway. It took a while, but gradually I realized that the contrasty, sunny-day scenes I preferred would just pick up more contrast in Cibachrome prints. (As an aside, I'm having many of those slides scanned--the outfit uses a high-res Canon rather than an actual scanner--and am having fun enhancing them, finally, in Lightroom.)

But I digress; back to Yaki point. It took me many years to begin to see as a photographer rather than a historian, although whether I'm "there yet" will always be an open question. Since going digital, I've also begun doing more different kinds of photos (I especially like working with the local high school drama group who let me get in for tight portraits during their rehearsals). I rarely even do trains any more, as landscapes have become predominant. Going back to your terrific scene, I think at times I "see" in black and white, but more often it's a function of looking over my images and choosing the ones to convert after the fact.

Don't know if this will encourage or discourage further discussion, but thanks for giving it a shot! As one more aside, your color work inspires me, too!
Go to
Dec 4, 2018 09:25:35   #
Very cute and imaginative--love the beard! Merry Christmas!
Go to
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Dec 4, 2018 09:23:05   #
Yep. Pretty much beats most of what I've done this year. Gorgeous, and welcome!
Go to
Dec 4, 2018 09:20:56   #
Wonderful indeed. I love how the water and sand flow back and forth into each other, tricking the eye and engaging us in the scene.
Go to
Dec 4, 2018 09:13:39   #
Just that little bit of sun on the hills infuses the whole scene with warmth. Quite lovely.
Go to
Dec 4, 2018 09:09:07   #
Outstanding scene. Powerful and evocative, and another reminder of why I so love the West (on the few occasions when I can get out there).

I love the control I have with digital software that I never had with film, but perhaps I just don't have sophisticated perception. So I'm curious as to whether you also made a digital original of the scene, and what advantages you saw in the film version, because I've never made a direct comparison. Of course, by the time you scan a negative and post it on line, the differences may be difficult to see.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 67 next>>
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.