BigWahoo wrote:
Carpet bombing and napalm is how we won the war in
Vietnam
The military "won" that war....the politicians "lost" it......sorta like....IRAQ!
Racmanaz wrote:
You are missing the point of this meme
I do believe that some of the "Whatsa matter...you afraid of the boogyman under the bed" crowd are beginning to see that the boogyman is real. Looks like something got their attention!
(and I'd bet a dollar to a donut that the i***t who said she'd "wing it" and not have a weapon, will have no trouble asking her brothers, WHO DO OWN WEAPONS,to protect her sorry ass!)
greymule wrote:
Good start. But my adrenaline is still saying:
K**l 'em all, k**l 'em all but six. Save them for the pallbearers.
My wife's ready to shoot me with a tranquilizer gun. I think I'm ready for a xanax myself.
Got your attention did they, greymule?
green wrote:
it would solve a lot of old problems permanently... and create a lot of new ones.
May absolutely have no choice, Greenie! It's up to them!!!!
If, God forbid, the bad guys acquire chem/bio/nuke weapons, and just so happen to k**l 40,000 or more Russians in one fell swoop, do you think Putin would leave mecca or medina alone?
I don't think the bad guys have to worry about us doing it, after all, I don't think the "boy king" would lift a finger!
green wrote:
it would solve a lot of old problems permanently... and create a lot of new ones.
May absolutely have no choice, Greenie! It's up to them!!!!
green wrote:
there, fixed it for you. :)
May come to that, Greenie!
joer wrote:
What I posted was the latest info at the time. I'm not glued to the radio or TV.
I have a life that keeps me busy unlike some here.
Yet here you are, back again,letting us know that you have a life away from here......carry on with your life!
green wrote:
I really doubt any muslims are involved in this one
Care to elaborate on this assumption? We're waiting!!
I believe we've seen the advent of the "sleeper cell". How many more are out there?
letmedance wrote:
We are still waiting on information on the shooters, notice that I said shooters, three to be exact. This was not your ordinary lunatic shooting. Wait for the investigation to finish before jumping on your soap boxes.
Looks like I was wrong in a previous post, when I advanced the theory that this might be drug gang/ cartel related. Looks like it isn't going to be "workplace violence", either.....although the powers that be will most likely spin it that way, or try to. We know who did it, and what it was;spin it all you want!
Something a little strange about this. If, in fact, it was more than one shooter, then I don't think it was a "disgruntled" former employee, aka workplace violence.
It was not at a PP location.
It was, supposedly, armed, tac gear shooters, with body armor.
It was aimed at a groups christmas party.Who was in that group?
No "willing to go down fighting", shouting allahu akbar, or anything.
Could it possibly have something to do with drug gang/ cartel violence, aimed at a certain group as retribution or payback? Just some thoughts.....could it be a radical extreme right wing nut job group??? It's possible....anything's possible, but somehow I doubt it!
JMO!!!
BigWahoo wrote:
"The major difference between the two acronyms lies in the last letter which stands for Syria or Levant. Levant is the historical term for the region east of the Mediterranean including Egypt, Iran and Turkey.
The United States officials began using ISIL instead of ISIS to better draw attention to the groups intentions to expand its influence beyond the borders of Syria and Iraq as ISIS is on a mission to create an Islamic state in Middle Eastern and African countries. "
And the Levant doesn't include Israel, does it?
idaholover wrote:
I'm just glad to see them use something other than N**i. :roll:
Obama and his followers call them ISIL, or "Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant". The levant is an area from the past that includes all the area where Israel is now, but without Israel......go figure! notice only Obama and his cronies/lackies use the term ISIL.
Steven Seward wrote:
The way I understood it, we funded a resistance group in Afghanistan called the "Northern Alliance," not to be confused with "Northern Tissue Paper." I think Bin Laden's group was at odds with the Northern Alliance, and assassinated their leader days before 911. I feel too lazy to look this up right now, so maybe somebody else can clarify. I'm so glad we don't have to rely on their oil any more, but I'm afraid that if we leave the Middle East, the whole place will eventually get swallowed up by ISIS and they will eventually get around to attacking us. Not that we are really fighting them much at the moment. Maybe the French will come through? Wee Wee!
The way I understood it, we funded a resistance gr... (
show quote)
I believe his name was Massoud, and yes, he was blown up by two suicide bombers posing as news journalists (ironic?) the day before the 9-11 attack. He was a difference maker. Pure speculation, but had he survived, I doubt OBL would have made it out of Tora Bora alive. Al Qaeda sure knew who to get out of the way. The same Al Qaeda that was at war with us for years before 9-11.
GeorgeH wrote:
Is there any evidence that he is mentally ill? I'd call him a d******c t*******t, like Eric Rudolph and other violent anti-a******n murderers. Cousins under the skin to ISIL.
It's ISIS, George....ISIS!
[quote=Frosty]
RixPix wrote:
Honestly, it really doesn't matter. When the Chinese decide to take this continent for its agriculture land there will be war.
China may have a very large army but it takes more than that. It is very difficult, expensive and takes a lot of time to project that kind of power away for one's homeland. If China would want to attempt to land an army here, they would first have to build a formidable navy to protect the troop ships. That would include submarines and aircraft carriers as well as troop and supply ships.
Bottom line. I wouldn't worry about it.
Honestly, it really doesn't matter. When the Chin... (
show quote)
But if I were Russia, I'd keep it in mind!