Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Boentgru
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 13 next>>
Dec 28, 2016 12:26:44   #
timepass wrote:
I took some shot's of the supermoon with my D3100 and Nikon 80-400mm lens,but no matter what I did I couldn't get them to focus very well.Used viewfinder and live view in mostly manual mode tried lots of different combinations to no avail.

Why not just set the focus at infinity? That's where the Moon is. (Unless you're walking there.)
Go to
Nov 24, 2016 08:06:15   #
"The Larger sensor will produce a much higher quality image" is not true. . . . .
Just my $.02. The best advice you got was to go to a camera store or even big box store and handle both. Remember what you intend to grow into and also consider the cost of quality crop lenses compared to full lenses.

Greg[/quote]

Go to
Nov 9, 2016 10:23:20   #
steveNovice wrote:
Sometimes the images look like paintings not photos.


Anything that allows the capture of a more life-like image (as seen by the bare eye), more realistic or eye-catching or pleasing image is OK with me, either in the camera or in post processing.
Go to
Nov 3, 2016 07:47:08   #
RonShearer wrote:
Seems like a last resort. I had a stuck filter once and bought a filter wrench set form the local camera store for $5. Worked like a charm.


The much better alternative is the filter wrench. Putting it one warm and removing it cold is not the reason. Both mating parts are at the same temp. Locking due to dissimilar materials or girt is a more likely cause.
Go to
Oct 31, 2016 07:50:41   #
rickeyt699 wrote:
Any suggestion for eliminating shadows when using flash in low light situations.


Use a second light source or a large diffuser or bounce light.
Go to
Oct 26, 2016 07:46:40   #
quote=LXK0930]Many years ago (way before digital), I took a photography course with a well-known pro. One assignment was to shoot NYC scenes. Students showed up with various cameras, ranging from budget 35mm's to Leicas, Contarexes, Alpa's, etc.

You guesed it! When we examined the results, the instructor's photos blew ours away. His choice of subjects, composition, darkroom technique (remember darkrooms?), and presentation were incredible. His equipment? A $10 disposable Kodak camera.

Moral: Learn to use the equipment you have, including it's limitations. Upgrade when you need to, but don't forget who really makes the photo.[/quote]

If one doesn't own and use the newest and "best" equipment, how else are we to justify Gear Acquisition Syndrome (GAS) and the reason our photos aren't perfect?
Go to
Oct 24, 2016 09:36:27   #
TommiRulz wrote:
I'm thinking of buying a mirrorless - but NOT to replace my 7Dmii, but to replace my point and shoot! I love the picture quality from my RX100 IV - but I hate the feel of it in my hands. So instead of going with RX100 V, I'm going to try A6500. (fuji XTII & A7RII are too expensive!)
So I have a question for all you Mirrorless fans - what lens should I start with?


Note that with a mirrorless, the distance from the lens to sensor is less than that for a DSLR type body. Therefore, there is room for an adapter to use a DSLR lens on the MIL body, especially if you have the same brand DSLR.
Go to
Oct 24, 2016 09:00:49   #
wingclui44 wrote:
I have both system, but I only use the mirrorless for carry around and for serious assignment I use my DSLs.


Why do you still use a SLR for "serious" assignments, beside the fact that you have the equipment? What advantages does the SLR format offer for you?
Go to
Oct 24, 2016 08:57:09   #
wingclui44 wrote:
I have both system, but I only use the mirrorless for carry around and for serious assignment I use my DSLs.


Why do you still use a DSL for "serious" assignments?
Go to
Oct 24, 2016 08:45:47   #
A fisheye lens can be made to see to the side but not in back of itself. Further, the image is distorted. There are, however, cameras which can take a single exposure with multiple lenses and rely on electronics to stitch the images together in a seamless, linear photo, e.g. the Ricoh Theta.
Go to
Oct 24, 2016 08:31:15   #
lwhitlow wrote:
I am looking at getting an updated laptop, or laptop with wider screen. Which one in your option is best - Apple or Dell. I have been using Dell for several years, and wondering if it would be better to purchase Apple for my photo editing. I have never used an Apple, so I am not sure if it is better than Dell, the same, or worse. Any input would be greatly appreciated.


Apple uses their own operating system, not Windows as is more universal, regardless what one thinks about the technical merits. Therefore, applications are more likely to use the Microsoft OS. Also the Apple products tend to be significantly more expensive.
Go to
Oct 24, 2016 08:20:08   #
elliott937 wrote:
Aside from a light camera, and aside from it being a "new" thing, why are photographers dropping their DSLR and switching to Mirrorless?


The SLR was developed for film cameras to view the scene which would be exposed through the camera's lens (optical path) when the shutter was triggered. It works around the fact that the film took a specific exposure once. The current electronic light sensor replaces the film, and is used repeatedly. So the same sensor can view and display the scene before the exposure. This means that:

1. The mirror box (of a SLR), its mechanism, the time delay, and the complexity is made redundant and unnecessary.
2. The physical gap (mirror box) between the end of the lens and the sensor (or focus plane) can be done away with.
3. The sensor and lens can be made smaller, more compact and perhaps cheaper.
4. The typical blackout, when the mirror flips up, is done away with.
5. Video and multiple exposures and be monitored by the electronic viewfinder (EVF) continuously during the photography process.
6. The camera becomes smaller, lighter, less complex, with fewer (or no) moving parts, and more reliable.
Go to
Oct 21, 2016 21:17:37   #
whitewolfowner wrote:
Amazon is selling a lot of fraudulent products. I have reported it to them multiple times myself and it seems nothing is ever done about it. I do not feel secure buying anything from them unless it is a brand name product I'm familiar with.


My experience with Amazon has been good. They're taken back stuff even with no reason given. I've never been refused a return.
Go to
Oct 21, 2016 16:36:50   #
imagemeister wrote:
YES ...


Well, if that's the answer to "Does anyone buy a camera without I.S. or VR?", then the question would be why would they not? The feature is useful, it works, and its added cost is small.
Go to
Oct 21, 2016 12:58:16   #
JCam wrote:
I have had and used many different binoculars over 60+ years of boating, most often 7 x 50's. After haven a pair stolen recently, I needed a new pair in a hurry and ended up with a pair of 8x50's. They are OK, but I find the magnification being a little bit too strong as any movement, my grip or the boat, make keeping them aimed at the subject is more difficult than the 7X. I can't imaging trying to hand hold a pair stronger than 8X steady enough for birding.


Try a binocular with image stabilization, such as the Canon I.S. series. You'll find that higher magnification are usable even hand-held.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 13 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.