My wife and I toured Victoria Falls a few years back, about the same time as you are going. The pathway along the falls provides some great views. Part of that pathway is covered in mist. For us, at one point, there was so much mist we could not see the falls. It was like walking through a rain storm. Our tour company provided some heavy duty ponchos which worked well. Also there were vendors at the falls that will rent ponchos. Knowing the mist may present a problem, I mostly kept my DSLR under my poncho and just used a waterproof point'n shoot. A plastic rain sleeve for your camera will work too. A bit cumbersome, but they'll do the job. Keep in mind that your shoes will get soaked. Wear crocks or something similar. Here's a YouTube link showing our trek through VF and the mist: https://youtu.be/S7QSG_MdA7M Hope this helps. You'll enjoy the falls.

I meant no insult. It was intended as a 'tongue in cheek' jab. I am in my upper 60's and close to retirement myself. However, I do take exception to my generation running down the younger generation. I have the great fortune that most of my colleagues are in their thirties. Without exception they are hard working, committed individuals. They put more value on experiences and friends than 'things' and possessions like our generation. They should not be faulted for spending $75 on a meal with friends instead of a UV filter for a camera.

Not at all. Those shorts are designed to shove the flab up into your biceps and pecs. You will look like Superman. You will certainly put on muscles pulling them on.

For example only; not a recommendation...... A report in a recent consumers magazine said that the 2013 D7100 was still one on the most popular DSLR's over a year old in use; a couple of Canons were also listed. No other brands made that list. But a four year old camera still holding its own against the likes of the D500? I'm impressed!

(Don't even ask; the cover was torn off and it was in my doctors waiting room where all the front covers are removed but the magazines are rotated monthly)

As I very clearly stated earlier if you can read I do not own any. But rent them regularly as needed for various project requirements from buildings to site models that are very large where the tilt comes in very handy for getting it all in focus. One does not need to own a lens to use it today. I do the same with cameras as well as need arises. Very similar to videographers seldom purchase the very expensive cameras and lenses used for certain productions but rent them for the intended use.
This way I have the opportunity to use some very interesting products that are not needed regularly and waste money and resources on something collecting dust 95% of the time just to brag I wasted money on it. Are your multiple TS lenses used daily? Even weekly? Even monthly? I doubt it if you are being honest. Owning a lens does not make one an expert with it's function. I could own a plane and have no clue as to how to fly it. It must be used frequently, especially the more complex it is to really know anything. Bragging about possessions is pretty stupid and a waste of life. And I really doubt your bragging about money spent and competence with it.