Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Mary P
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 40 next>>
Oct 25, 2012 23:33:38   #
Holy cow, Cap, that 758 is over $600! I looked at that one because I AM looking at getting a Pocket Wizard. Those are ridiculous, too. Sheesh....
Go to
Oct 25, 2012 11:06:32   #
Yes, I could use the histogram better. I do use it in ps all the time. Tethering, forget it! I'm all over the place, standing on the kitchen table and shooting down sometimes. Don't want to wake those babies up! :)

chauncey wrote:
I disagree with the need for a meter...as a fair number of newer DSLRs have a live view mode that can show a histrogram on that LCD screen.
Put that camera in manual mode>set the needed SS and f/stop, then adjust the ISO to push, but not touch, that histogram to the right side.
Also...if your in a studio setting, shooting tethered is a very viable method to adjust your lighting on the fly. Kind of an instant gratification sort of thing.
Go to
Oct 25, 2012 11:03:12   #
Interesting. I didn't think of that either. I just need to keep learning about this complicated little machine.

Roy Hakala wrote:
I just took a number of outdoor shots with plenty of light and they were all very dark... Until I realised I had accidentally bumped the exposure compensat dial down by two Ev.

A couple of times over the years, something just seemed off and I used the camera menu to "clear all camera settings." this wipes out any oddball thing that I might have programmed in, by accident or not, and then gives me a fresh start.
Go to
Oct 25, 2012 11:01:00   #
Oh man! I forgot all about that! Was taught about that a couple of years ago when doing senior photos. Thank you!

RichieC wrote:
% of frame that is white was throwing your in camera meter off. It was probably trying to properly expose the entire frame. Set your camera to spot metering, or move camera in till the little guy mostly fills your screen, make note of the readings and switch to manual and replicate the settings when you pull back out.

While a hand held meter does this by its nature, (holding the meter right in front of your subject when poping your lighting or existing ambient light), the meters in the camera are a huge part of and cameras ability to properly expose any image. I think Nikon/Canon/Etc., would have issue with saying their in camera meters don't work well, their job is pretty simple after all. It's just returning what it "sees", it's up to you to show it what you want. And in fact a hand held won't help much if you don't use it right, but no argument about what one can do!

What a hand held meter can do that your camera can't easily is figure out what individual light source(s) are emitting, so you can figure out an adjustment to solve a problem or to set up. It is a valuable tool in a professionals portrait gear.
% of frame that is white was throwing your in came... (show quote)


:oops:
Go to
Oct 25, 2012 10:54:28   #
Oh, trust me, there's tons of these out there! Look on Youtube on how to do it. Some people are pretty slick at it. I'm just learning... But thanks for the compliment! I always can use some urging on! :)

jeanbug35 wrote:
You are very inventive and very good.
Go to
Oct 24, 2012 23:30:18   #
Did you happen to notice the waterworks?
Go to
Oct 24, 2012 23:02:01   #
Photoshopping two photos together... I should be getting better at it, but I really rather liked my first the best. These two I did today....




Go to
Oct 24, 2012 22:57:31   #
Yes, I just realized when I posted this that the shutter was really fast. But no matter how I set the camera, the pictures always looked dark. I guess you are right. I'll have to get a meter. It just seems that when it's in aperature priority, the shutter should know what to do...

CaptainC wrote:
I know I sound like a broken record, but if you are going to do this kind of work, an incident light meter will be your best friend. Your problems aside, you have a beautiful image there.

It is rather obvious that if your camera went to 1/1250, you had no need to bump the ISO to 3200.
Go to
Oct 24, 2012 22:27:24   #
Had two babies to photograph today and usually use the sunlight that comes in the windows, but today was dark and dreary. I have two 3x3 softboxes. Camera set on AV, wide open for very shallow DOF. Why in the world couldn't I get enough light? Turned the lights off, on, changed the ISO from 400 to 3200. Tried everything and then tried it backwards. Finally just shot with the lights and with ISO at a whopping 3200. Just looked at my shutter speed which was 1/1250s. I missed something. Sure seems like the shutter should have slowed down and let more light in. I really had to lighten my pictures....


Go to
Oct 24, 2012 22:15:36   #
Last picture of the day. Fun...


Go to
Oct 22, 2012 11:20:54   #
Note to self: Put shoulder of big guy behind the next guy and do more with their hands! Lost my flash, btw... :(


Go to
Oct 18, 2012 18:58:16   #
Nice looking young man! Thank you! (This reminds me to find my flash!)


nmjan wrote:
My grandson Kaden
Go to
Oct 18, 2012 18:56:04   #
Thank you! They are very nice!

elise3 wrote:
These are of my daughter. I didn't take these, a photographer by the name of Bob Caylor from Avalon photography did them for her. He had a lot of things outside of his studio, that were unique and did some shoots in industrial areas, or local fields, or a local old barn like this one. We looked at quite a few photographers and he was by far the best in the area. Unfortunately he doesn't do seniors pics any more and has moved on to more industrial commercial.
Go to
Oct 18, 2012 16:29:27   #
This is probably a really stupid remark, but did you try taking that battery out?
Go to
Oct 18, 2012 16:26:41   #
No suggestions, but that sure is an interesting toy you have there!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 40 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.