Posts for: FuzMuz
Oct 9, 2011 18:44:19 #
Joyfullee wrote:
That is nice! Could you tell me how I could have achieved that with my camera? I was setting the meter to the middle "0."
Please and thank you.
:-)
FuzMuz wrote:
The pathway photo is an excelant use of "leading lines" to draw the observers eye into the picture. Attached is a lighten version, hope you like it.
That is nice! Could you tell me how I could have achieved that with my camera? I was setting the meter to the middle "0."
Please and thank you.
:-)
Pre-processed in the camera, perhaps slight over exposure of 1/2 to 1 fstop. Post processing is easier, I used Elements 9; Enhance//Adjust Lighting//Shadows/Highlights. Play with all three sliders until you get the effect you want.
Oct 9, 2011 10:07:36 #
Someone posted this sailboat refletion (can't find the post unfortunetly). The retouch intent was to add some blue to the sky instead got this with the gradien tool.
original
gradient effect
Oct 8, 2011 14:39:37 #
Thanks for making us read the fine print - Bob, Gessman hold the door open I'm outa here to
Oct 8, 2011 14:25:59 #
The pathway photo is an excelant use of "leading lines" to draw the observers eye into the picture. Attached is a lighten version, hope you like it.
Pathway into nature
Oct 8, 2011 14:03:17 #
evadsllim wrote:
I'm still learning PP techniques and the Neahkahnie Mt. shot is definitely overdone. I processed that one a while ago and I had a tendency to over cook due to inexperience. I'm working on toning it down some. Here's another try.
Both are very nice. You can get a slightly lower angle view of this beach from Hwy 101. Have driven by it several times and always thought there was a great picture to be taken, tho every time I was dealing with dark overcast and dismal lighting.
Oct 7, 2011 09:08:45 #
Oct 6, 2011 21:38:50 #
ShakyShutter wrote:
quote=FuzMuz quote=ShakyShutter quote=FuzMuz q... (show quote)
Don't recall exactly but I'm sure it involved adjusting midtone and levels.
Oct 6, 2011 16:26:40 #
ShakyShutter wrote:
I was just about to ask what type of processing you were doing to those photos. I'm trying to troubleshoot same for a friend who often gets the same result.
Are these HDR or Tonemapped images?
FuzMuz wrote:
Do you have a suggestion how the flatness could be resolved, either post processed via Photoshop or pre processed in the camera.
photophly wrote:
Nice shots but the colors look a little flat
Do you have a suggestion how the flatness could be resolved, either post processed via Photoshop or pre processed in the camera.
I was just about to ask what type of processing you were doing to those photos. I'm trying to troubleshoot same for a friend who often gets the same result.
Are these HDR or Tonemapped images?
Did not HDR/tone map these photos. First two used Nikon D5000 (12mps) with VI setting then post processed in Elements 9. Trappers Loop was shot with a Minolta Dimage7 (7mps) then processed with Elements 9.
Oct 6, 2011 16:03:24 #
Big Daddy wrote:
I like this shot.. took it at Findley State Park in Ohio.
Don't crop, you will lose the long tree reflections. Should you get another opportunity place the swan in the center vertically and slightly off center horizontally. Yes this flies in the face of "rule of thirds" but sometimes the rules need to be broken.
Oct 6, 2011 15:50:39 #
Hawaiian forelore tells a story that the moth is a reincarnated ancestor and brings good fortune to those who see them.
Oct 6, 2011 15:25:00 #
Two things to try using Photoshop product.
1. Select Enhance/adjust lighting/shadows&highlights. Adjust the shadow control bar.
2. If the above affects the sky too much, then use selection brush to select only the mountains. Then adjust shadows&highlights.
1. Select Enhance/adjust lighting/shadows&highlights. Adjust the shadow control bar.
2. If the above affects the sky too much, then use selection brush to select only the mountains. Then adjust shadows&highlights.
method 1 example
Method 2 example
Oct 6, 2011 15:09:26 #
Oct 5, 2011 16:30:42 #
photophly wrote:
Your's appear flat on my moniter
FuzMuz wrote:
The colors are over saturated wih little improvement in detail. Perhaps the difference is in the monitor calibration yours & mine.
photophly wrote:
I like the shot , hope U don't mind that I played with it a little,I think it brings out some hidden detail
FuzMuz wrote:
Max is looking for a major movie contract. Arine watch out there is a new kid on the block
I like the shot , hope U don't mind that I played with it a little,I think it brings out some hidden detail
The colors are over saturated wih little improvement in detail. Perhaps the difference is in the monitor calibration yours & mine.
Your's appear flat on my moniter
Looks like Gessman called it correctly. http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-2889-1.html
Oct 5, 2011 16:26:22 #
photophly wrote:
Your's appear flat on my moniter
FuzMuz wrote:
The colors are over saturated wih little improvement in detail. Perhaps the difference is in the monitor calibration yours & mine.
photophly wrote:
I like the shot , hope U don't mind that I played with it a little,I think it brings out some hidden detail
FuzMuz wrote:
Max is looking for a major movie contract. Arine watch out there is a new kid on the block
I like the shot , hope U don't mind that I played with it a little,I think it brings out some hidden detail
The colors are over saturated wih little improvement in detail. Perhaps the difference is in the monitor calibration yours & mine.
Your's appear flat on my moniter
Looks like Guessman called it correctly. http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-2889-1.html
Oct 5, 2011 16:00:25 #
photophly wrote:
I like the shot , hope U don't mind that I played with it a little,I think it brings out some hidden detail
FuzMuz wrote:
Max is looking for a major movie contract. Arine watch out there is a new kid on the block
I like the shot , hope U don't mind that I played with it a little,I think it brings out some hidden detail
The colors are over saturated wih little improvement in detail. Perhaps the difference is in the monitor calibration yours & mine.