Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Bonkles
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 next>>
Mar 8, 2013 06:54:31   #
fstop22 wrote:
The ideal is to have leading lines pull you into the photo. If the lines continue thru and out of the photo then you have missed the point of having them. In landscapes I will try to start leading lines in a corner pulling towards the center to the subject


Excellent
Go to
Mar 8, 2013 06:52:56   #
Rex-Pix wrote:
I deliberately left this post till after as this may be contentious. Recently our camera club had the identical as ba set topic. The judge tore into the majority of contestants' stating that leading lines which do not lead to an object of interest (punctum) were pointless?! He is a highly acclaimed judge and photographer and needless to say peaved off many. Think he has a point though. Other thoughts ?


It is only his point of view. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. When you go to a major Gallery of art, some you like some you do not but most are considered to be master pieces. Many of which have been acclaimed long after the artist has died. I think your so called judge is very picky, did they define leading lines to every one prior to the club competition. It is always easy to be critical after the event. The current UHF leading lines has produced some excellent shots for all to gain experience from.
Go to
Mar 6, 2013 14:53:14   #
Mortimer Levy wrote:
I guess it's a weakness of many photographers, a tendency to be more enthralled by new equipment than what you already possess and what you can do with it. I kinda' shy away from new stuff: I worry that I may give in and get rid of some very adequate equipment that has served me well and replace it with shiny new and expensive stuff. I think the marketing people depend on this to some extent to sell their wares. Regards Mort Levy Montreal/Florida.


I do agree but I have a definite plan to move away from heavy DSLR's. I purchased a high end Nikon compact 10M camera after much research about 6 years ago. Which goes almost every where with me. Now that I am retired I want something with a bit more punch but still along the lines of small is great. I have been monitoring the Nikon and Sony camera developments over the past two years and I believe the new Sony NEX range which I have tried is really top notch. The NEX-7n APS-C sensor size and interchangeable pancake lenses, from the draft spec I have seen, looks as if it will fit my requirements. I am quite glad I did not venture into buying a Nikon CSC last year. Lets hope Sony produce the camera in reality as good as the spec reads.
Go to
Mar 6, 2013 12:24:06   #
Mortimer Levy wrote:
You're right! I doubt if it's better than the Canon G10 etc., ...but the Canon is half the price. M.L. Montreal.


Your quite correct about price. However, the NEX-7n to be launched in April has a more impressive specification to the Cannon G series so I suspect the FF NEX-9! will be even better. They both are due to have new sensors at 24M, phase detect focus, which will be a great improvement, new optical view finder, 10 fps shooting and number of new E mount lenses. It Obviously depends on what you use your camera for whether these new cameras would be better for you.
Go to
Mar 6, 2013 05:41:28   #
Mogul wrote:
Hypno wrote:
What do you think of the new DX sensor size coolpix from Nikon. $1000 large, for a fixed lens camera. Why not put the DX lens on the Mirrorless. Maybe Nikon does not want to compete with its DSLR


If a Coolpix with a DX sensor is here, can an FX be far behind? The thought of what the price could be frightens me.


It seems from the quality rumors and the feedback being requested by Sony within the Sony Forum that a FF CSC NEX9 is likely mid year
Go to
Mar 6, 2013 05:36:41   #
markymark wrote:
Can you vote for your own photograph, I have noticed a lot of one vote entrees with a full share of the vote. And I have noticed photographs below them with 3 or 4 votes. It would appear that the ones with 3 or 4 votes did not vote for their own work or at least voted for others as well. Just wondering, regards Markymark.


Hi

There is no point in voting for your own photo. It is not about the winning/receiving the most votes. Photography quality/ beauty is in the eye of the beholder within the group. I did receive one vote last comp but never vote for my own. Sometimes I vote for one photo I really like but there are many photos in my eye I cannot separate and will perhaps vote for more than one. When the results come out I then review to try and understand how perhaps I should approach the subject/next comp another time.

I hope that helps
Go to
Feb 28, 2013 09:50:08   #
GrahamS wrote:
Bonkles wrote:
GrahamS wrote:
You won't do a Sony NEX 7 any favours by using that lens as your primary optic. Use it for fun, but invest in a good Sony lens.


Many thanks for your reply. I was hoping for a reply like yours. The lens has been really good but is far to heavy for my Compact System approach to photography these days.

Are you an NEX user?


No, I am a reviewer. The CZJ series of zoom lenses made with Minolta, Canon FD, Olympus OM, Nikon F, M42, Exakta and Praktica bayonet mounts were made under contract by Sigma and Cosina. They are not optimised in any way for digital use, and the rear element is not coated to prevent ghosting when used with a digital sensor. In fact, they are not really up to CZJ quality standards at all.
quote=Bonkles quote=GrahamS You won't do a Sony ... (show quote)


Thank you. Hopefully I will receive a copy of your reviewer comments on the expected NEX 7n.
Go to
Feb 28, 2013 09:47:57   #
SnapHappy wrote:
Bonkles wrote:
Until recently I used my Minolta X570 with a Carl Zeiss Jena 28-70, f2.8-4.3 Macro MC for the majority of my photography, until digital became more attractive. I started with a Minolta Dimage and the last five years with a Nikon Compact but I am now seriously evaluating the NEX 7 and awaiting the launch of the 7n due to be announced in March. To use the above lens with the NEX range I gather I need an adapter! Does anyone have more detailed info on a suitable adapter and the pros and cons of using this lens with the Sony NEX?

Bonkles
Until recently I used my Minolta X570 with a Carl ... (show quote)


After reading all the responses you've gotten I don't know if my experience will help all that much but here goes: I got the NEX-5n a few months ago for such a good deal that I got the Sony E-mount 55-210 lens also, instead of getting an adapter to use my Canon lenses. My reasoning was simply that I needed to get away from the size and weight of the Canon FD and EF mount lenses and go to something lighter, more portable, more gentle for my old body (!). I've been more than happy with my choices!
quote=Bonkles Until recently I used my Minolta X5... (show quote)


Thank you for expanding my understanding. You have probably seen from the messages that I am into Compact Cameras and it is amazing the results you can achieve. My reasoning for going to the NEX is weight, like yourself, a better sensor, pixel range and FPS for the various shots I take
Go to
Feb 28, 2013 09:46:54   #
SnapHappy wrote:
Bonkles wrote:
Until recently I used my Minolta X570 with a Carl Zeiss Jena 28-70, f2.8-4.3 Macro MC for the majority of my photography, until digital became more attractive. I started with a Minolta Dimage and the last five years with a Nikon Compact but I am now seriously evaluating the NEX 7 and awaiting the launch of the 7n due to be announced in March. To use the above lens with the NEX range I gather I need an adapter! Does anyone have more detailed info on a suitable adapter and the pros and cons of using this lens with the Sony NEX?

Bonkles
Until recently I used my Minolta X570 with a Carl ... (show quote)




After reading all the responses you've gotten I don't know if my experience will help all that much but here goes: I got the NEX-5n a few months ago for such a good deal that I got the Sony E-mount 55-210 lens also, instead of getting an adapter to use my Canon lenses. My reasoning was simply that I needed to get away from the size and weight of the Canon FD and EF mount lenses and go to something lighter, more portable, more gentle for my old body (!). I've been more than happy with my choices!
quote=Bonkles Until recently I used my Minolta X5... (show quote)


Thank you for expanding my understanding. You have probably seen from the messages that I am into Compact Cameras and it is amazing the results you can achieve. My reasoning for going to the NEX is weight, like yourself, a better sensor, pixel range and FPS for the various shots I take.
Go to
Feb 27, 2013 15:32:53   #
plewislambert wrote:
You get cheap adapters on eBay for most modern cameras that allow different lenses..
A zoom lens that claims macro capability is not as good as a real macro non-zoom (I tried various).
I had good results photographing flowers using a Nikon macro lens, a Tamron macro lens and a Tamron 200mm (not macro) on adapters to suit a Panasonic micro 4/3 outfit. The 200mm took photos from 9 feet away and the macros worked a whole lot closer with entirely different perspective and less in focus. A tripod and delayed action release are vital.
Philip
You get cheap adapters on eBay for most modern cam... (show quote)


Thank you for taking the time to reply. The cons of using this lens may just simply defeat the reason for going to a Compact System Camera for general use. As has been suggested the setup with adapter may be fine for local/ fun use but not as a general walk about lens.
Go to
Feb 27, 2013 15:26:51   #
GrahamS wrote:
You won't do a Sony NEX 7 any favours by using that lens as your primary optic. Use it for fun, but invest in a good Sony lens.


Many thanks for your reply. I was hoping for a reply like yours. The lens has been really good but is far to heavy for my Compact System approach to photography these days.

Are you an NEX user?
Go to
Feb 27, 2013 15:13:09   #
foehner wrote:
Bonkles wrote:
Excellent. You have given me some great ideas. I assume the IP camera is battery driven with a radio link or is it hardwired into a USB port?


This IP camera connects to my home wireless network. It is a stand alone device on the network (once setup) and has its own IP address. It (evidently) has its own web server.

The camera does need to be plugged into household electricity. I had outdoor wiring in the general area of the feeder, so just extended it to the camera. The wiring is all underground and then goes up to the feeder inside the pole, so it is never exposed to the elements and critters.

There are lots of different cameras available and you can probably find something that fits your situation.
quote=Bonkles Excellent. You have given me some ... (show quote)


Many thanks for taking the time to share an excellent hobby project with another birder.
Go to
Feb 27, 2013 05:48:09   #
foehner wrote:
This is more for the bird folks here rather than the photo folks, but it does involve cameras, so.....

I needed to replace a bird feeder this past fall, so I decided to build a big hopper style feeder that could hold a couple weeks worth of sunflower seeds. When designing it, I included a small "room" that would hold a web/IP camera. The camera can tilt and rotate (but not zoom), so it is set up to look one way to see birds getting sunflower seeds or turn to look out a window and see a peanut feeder. People looking at the feeder over the internet can use controls to position the camera.

I made design errors (of course), the camera resolution sucks and it really needs a zoom, but it is still fun to get a closer look at the birds on our feeder. And I don't have to get off the couch to look out the window when I want to see birds. :lol:

This feeder is in St. Louis, so we see Eurasian Tree Sparrows. Otherwise, its just typical US midwest birds. The camera runs off my home network, so I haven't opened it to public access, but would provide a login to a few people for a short time if anyone is interested.
This is more for the bird folks here rather than t... (show quote)


Excellent. You have given me some great ideas. I assume the IP camera is battery driven with a radio link or is it hardwired into a USB port?
Go to
Feb 27, 2013 05:23:08   #
Mogul wrote:
Bonkles wrote:
Until recently I used my Minolta X570 with a Carl Zeiss Jena 28-70, f2.8-4.3 Macro MC for the majority of my photography, until digital became more attractive. I started with a Minolta Dimage and the last five years with a Nikon Compact but I am now seriously evaluating the NEX 7 and awaiting the launch of the 7n due to be announced in March. To use the above lens with the NEX range I gather I need an adapter! Does anyone have more detailed info on a suitable adapter and the pros and cons of using this lens with the Sony NEX?

Bonkles
Until recently I used my Minolta X570 with a Carl ... (show quote)



You can get a list here:
http://sonyalphalab.com/sony-alpha-and-nex-technology-camera-and-lens-tutorial-guides/lens-adapters/
quote=Bonkles Until recently I used my Minolta X5... (show quote)


Thank you very much for your help
Go to
Feb 26, 2013 12:23:56   #
Until recently I used my Minolta X570 with a Carl Zeiss Jena 28-70, f2.8-4.3 Macro MC for the majority of my photography, until digital became more attractive. I started with a Minolta Dimage and the last five years with a Nikon Compact but I am now seriously evaluating the NEX 7 and awaiting the launch of the 7n due to be announced in March. To use the above lens with the NEX range I gather I need an adapter! Does anyone have more detailed info on a suitable adapter and the pros and cons of using this lens with the Sony NEX?

Bonkles
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.