Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: dlwhawaii
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 241 next>>
Dec 23, 2023 10:47:19   #
FrumCA wrote:
Trump's use of those words was ill-advised, but you don't have to compare what he said to attract interest. Just look at the freebies the democrat party promotes to see the best example of trying to get in good with the poorly educated.


Such as?
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 21:28:23   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
Below are Chairman Comer’s remarks as prepared for delivery.

Since assuming our Republican majority in January, the House Oversight and Accountability Committee has uncovered a mountain of evidence revealing how Joe Biden abused his public office for his family’s financial gain.

For years, President Biden has lied to the American people about his knowledge of and participation in his family’s corrupt business schemes.

At least ten times, Joe Biden lied to the American people that he never spoke to his family about their business dealings.

He lied by telling the American people that there was an “absolute wall” between his official government duties and his personal life.

Let’s be clear: there was no wall. The door was wide open to those who purchased what a business associate described as “The Biden Brand.”

Evidence reveals that then-Vice President Joe Biden spoke, dined, and developed relationships with his family’s foreign business targets. These business targets include foreign oligarchs who sent millions of dollars to his family. It also includes a Chinese national who wired a quarter of a million dollars to his son.

Joe Biden also lied to the American people about his family making money in China. He has continued to lie about it even when the House Oversight Committee uncovered bank wires revealing how the Bidens received millions from Chinese companies with significant ties to the Chinese intelligence and the Chinese C*******t Party.

Just this week, we uncovered two additional wires sent to H****r B***n that originated in Beijing from Chinese nationals. This happened when Joe Biden was running for President of the United States. And Joe Biden’s home is listed as the beneficiary address.

To date, the House Oversight Committee has uncovered how the Bidens and their associates created over 20 shell companies – most of which were created when Joe Biden was Vice President – and raked in over $24 million dollars between 2014-2019.

We’ve also identified nine members of the Biden family who have participated in or benefited from these business schemes.

What were the Bidens selling to make all this money?

Joe Biden himself.

Joe Biden is “The Brand.” And Joe Biden showed up at least two dozen times with business targets and associates sending signals of access, influence, and power to those prepared to pay for it.

The American people demand accountability for this culture of corruption.

They demand to know how these schemes have c*********d President Biden and threaten our national security.

They demand safeguards to be put in place to prevent public officials from selling access to their public office for private gain.

Under the leadership of Speaker Kevin McCarthy, House Republicans have now opened an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.

By opening an impeachment inquiry, our investigation is now focused on whether President Biden engaged in impeachable offenses under the U.S. Constitution.

It empowers Congress, elected by The People, to continue providing the answers, t***sparency, and accountability that the American people demand and deserve.

In recent history, Democrats inflicted much damage on the credibility of congressional investigations by peddling the Russia Collusion H**x.

But this Committee, under this majority, will not pursue such witch hunts based on manufactured allegations, innuendo, and no real evidence.

Today, the House Oversight Committee will examine over two dozen pieces of evidence revealing Joe Biden’s corruption and abuse of public office. This includes e-mails, text messages, bank records, and testimony of Biden business associates.

We will hear from legal and financial experts about this evidence and crimes that may have been committed as Joe Biden was sold around the world.
Below are Chairman Comer’s remarks as prepared for... (show quote)


Wyant, where is the EVIDENCE? Comer says: " yada, yada, yada." Evidence talks, BS walks.
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 20:35:26   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
You're full of it, they have found plenty and will find more.... Joe has lied and lied and lied about this from the beginning however those lies have been exposed, money does not have to go directly to Joe if it goes to his family because of his actions that is also the standard.

Why do you folks defend a man who is clearly one of the most corrupt creatures in the DC swamp?


Hey Myopic. What have they found, SPECIFICALLY? Crickets.......
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 20:02:23   #
Wyantry wrote:
aqua, black, blue, fuchsia, gray, green, lime, maroon, navy, olive, purple, red, silver, teal, white, and yellow

C’mon Krak! Semiautomatic firearms existed (and were in use) prior to 1770. The founders and writers of the Constitution knew full-well the potential for technological advancement.

By your [Warped] reasoning, you should have to communicate only with feather-pen and inkwell.
No computer,
No internet,
No wireless phones,
No radio, no telephones,
No television,
No cameras, (No Hedgehog Forum).
No electricity,
No cars, busses, trucks, trains or planes.
No propane,
No solar cells,
No wind generators.

All newspaper, magazines and books printed on a manually operated single-page printing press and delivered by horse-post.

That might be the “idyllic” lifestyle you and H. D. Thoreau promote. It does not work well for most people.

A return to eighteenth century technology is COMPLETELY impossible.
aqua, black, blue, fuchsia, gray, green, lime, mar... (show quote)


Wyant, you're full of it. Ferdinand Ritter von Mannlicher produced the first successful design for a semi-automatic rifle in 1885, and by the early 20th century, many manufacturers had introduced semi-automatic shotguns, rifles and pistols.(Wikipedia) How in the world would the founders of the Constitution know this. I know, they were all seers. They were able to "see" technology development 2-3 hundred years into the future. It's just a matter of slight extrapolation to go from Gutenberg (printing press 1440AD) to semiautomatic rifles (1885) to IBM computers (1981). Right Wyant?
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 19:05:04   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
Hey, maybe Comer and friends can hold hearings in regard to the Biden crime family in the new year and the bribes paid to them for federal policy... Find Slo guilty so that Florida and Texas can then remove him from their b****ts.


They haven't found anything yet (2 years later), maybe they can manufacture "evidence" next year. The Republicans are good at that. That's why H****r testified LIVE on the Capitol steps instead of in front of a CLOSED Republican Committee.
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 15:49:13   #
dennis2146 wrote:
No it was not by choice but simply a GIVEN that if an a******n is needed because of rape and/or incest it should be done.

Are you really SFS you do not know some women have a******ns because the child is not the sex she wants? Have you never heard that before. Because you are an ignorant POS does that mean what I posted was wrong?

Doesn't take much to get you all pissy and acting like a little piss ant child does it little hiawatha? You sure do not handle common sense well do you? But HEY, show me where in the Constitution does it show a woman has a RIGHT to an a******n. So far not a one of you lying Left Wingers has ever pointed that part out, pointed out exactly why SCOTUS should have ever approved Roe Vs Wade to begin with. Are you completely unable to follow along with the thread and answer questions or keep up with what is going on? You tell me why a woman should have a RIGHT to an a******n. Where is that stated it is permissible to murder a fetus?

Dennis
No it was not by choice but simply a GIVEN that if... (show quote)


Show me in the Constitution where it says women DON'T have a right to have an a******n.
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 14:05:13   #
dennis2146 wrote:
little hiawatha you are joking aren't you? Roe Vs Wade should never have been decided by the Supreme Court to begin with. Only i***t Left Wingers really believe that nonsense. The Supreme Court decides cases basically with reference to Constitutional law. Yet not one phrase in the Constitution has anything at all to do with a woman's right to abort a child just because she was foolish enough, stupid enough or decided she had 2 boys and wanted a girl but another boy was coming. Do you honestly think the Founding Fathers would have approved of a******n as used these days? Yeah, me neither.

Tell us where in the Constitution a******n might be covered to the point where the Supreme Court should have made a decision in Roe Vs Wade. What section shall we look under? How on earth then did the Supreme Court miss that section? Maybe you should call the Chief Justice and inform him of his grievous error in judgement.

What the Supreme Court did was refer a******n back to the states as it was always a States Rights issue to begin with. You KNEW that didn't you?

Republican practice you ask me. Nope, not by a long shot. Surely you know this is all coming from Democrats. Show me where this is Republican practice, give some examples.

Dennis
little hiawatha you are joking aren't you? Roe Vs... (show quote)


How convenient you avoid rape and incest. Is that CHOICE? "Yet not one phrase in the Constitution has anything at all to do with a woman's right to abort a child just because she was foolish enough, stupid enough or decided she had 2 boys and wanted a girl but another boy was coming." MGYSAFS.
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 12:12:06   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
Adjudicated by whom? What authority adjudicated J6 as an i**********n?


DOJ, US Attorney's Office, Washington, DC. https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/30-months-j***6-attack-capitol#:~:text=Sentencings%3A,sentenced%20to%20periods%20of%20incarceration.
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 11:37:45   #
FrumCA wrote:
No surprises here. Colorado is a firmly blue state.


And SCOTUS is a firmly red state.
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 11:27:36   #
Triple G wrote:
Yet, this amendment doesn't require indictment nor conviction.

It also does not say to what level "proof" needs to be satisfied. Is it "beyond a reasonable doubt", "preponderance of evidence" , "reasonable man", etc.?

Only SCOTUS can further define the application of the amendment to trump's activities and eligibility to be on b****ts.


And they are already bought and paid for by Trump and the GOP.
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 11:21:57   #
Racmanaz wrote:
So you have no examples. That's interesting. Poisoning the blood of the nation? That's pretty vague.


Rac, you're vague.
Go to
Dec 19, 2023 17:03:29   #
Racmanaz wrote:
Liar, I am nowhere near a MAGA supporter of Trump, I don’t even like the dude. It’s you that always defends the p*******e we have in office now. P*******es always defend other p*******es.


YOU are calling me a p*******e? Tssk. Tssk. Such language, Rac.
slan·der
/ˈslandər/
nounLAW
the action or crime of making a false spoken statement damaging to a person's reputation.
Go to
Dec 19, 2023 14:43:46   #
To accuse without proof is slander, unless you're a Republican on Biden's Impeachment Committee.
Go to
Dec 19, 2023 13:28:46   #
Racmanaz wrote:
Actually, it’s you that’s puckering up for Joe Biden and the p*******e. I couldn’t care less about Trump.


BS Rac. You are one prime MAGAt for Trump. You shouldn't call Biden a p*******e without proof. I know you don't have any proof except your BS beliefs. YSAFS. HAND.
Go to
Dec 19, 2023 12:58:52   #
Racmanaz wrote:
BS, who is the one that supported and greenlighted the Nord stream two pipeline for Russia to Germany, benefiting Russia as well? Who is the one that allowed Putin to invade Ukraine? The answer to both of those questions is p*******e Joe Biden. President Trump opposed the Nord stream pipeline because it would benefit Russia Donald Trump has present also prevented Putin from invading Ukraine. That’s why Putin waited till Joe Biden went to Office because he knew he would do very little to stop him.
BS, who is the one that supported and greenlighted... (show quote)


Pucker up for Trump, Rac.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 241 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.