Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Triple G
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 642 next>>
May 4, 2024 13:12:33   #
Effate wrote:
Frankly, I don’t care who they hire. If they have the goods, they have the goods but I am curious if you could support your claim that it is not unusual for a person holding a very senior position at Department of Justice leaving to be a Deputy District Attorney in Manhattan.


I have no knowledge on why people change government jobs; I never worked in government. In the corporate world, it's usually more money, higher rank, philosophical differences, or head-butting with boss. If reports are true, Pomerantz had head-butting events where Pomerantz wanted Bragg to be more aggressive. It may be just that simple.

Or are you talking about Colangelo?
Go to
May 4, 2024 12:25:24   #
dennis2146 wrote:
And your deflection trying to prove you are not deflecting is just s**t swirling down a toilet. Pretty pathetic non attempt.

Dennis


Go back and look at what I posted. It clearly answers your questions. That's not deflection. Your not accepting the answers and resorting to speculation is the deflection on this thread.

Answers:
1) he went because he respects subpoena
2) he invoked the fifth because it his right and he was ordered by a court to keep silent on information regarding an ongoing case.
3) Jordan can take next steps to file contempt charges

Pomerantz is between a rock and a hard place. Congressional Contempt charge if doesn't testify or a contempt of court charge if he does. What would you decide?
Go to
May 4, 2024 11:44:04   #
dennis2146 wrote:
Sorry Spanky but those bulls**t items you speak of have nothing to do with why this man would plead the 5th Amendment. THAT is the question. When questioned Trump or any other defendant has a right to plead the 5th. This man is not on trial is he, NOT a defendant is he? Then why the need to plead the 5th Amendment when he is supposed to be honest. But apparently is not honest. Why is it you, none of you can fathom the idiocy of him pleading the 5th?

ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz,

Dennis
Sorry Spanky but those bulls**t items you speak of... (show quote)


Because it's not idiocy. It's our system and Jordan can refer a contempt of congress report if he's so inclined.

Realize that maga motive wants to get rid of state cases where trump is not able to pardon a conviction as in a federal case. That is politically motivated. The judges will determine the merits of all the cases. Speculate all you will about pleading the fifth; it will keep you going in circles with no satisfactory answers. Speculation is just your brain exercising in a blender
Go to
May 4, 2024 11:13:16   #
dennis2146 wrote:
We aren't talking about Jordan etc. are we? This has nothing to do with anybody else EXCEPT for the man in the link pleading the 5th Amendment when IF the Trump prosecutorial team was honest that man would simply say NO when asked those questions. Why is it you on the Left are unable to equate a public official is supposed to be able to not NEED the 5th Amendment which is generally speaking used in a court of law and not for simple questions.

This thread has NOTHING at all to do with Trump ever pleading the 5th, his supposed crimes, his children, others on the Conservative side reporting someplace as you tell me they should have or anything else EXCEPT what I posted in the video link. Yet you feel the need to deflect, to whine like little babies, but Trump, but Jordan, but this and that, but, but, but. STOP deflecting, stick with the thread as posted and explain why someone would claim the 5th Amendment Right to not incriminate himself when asked questions about illegal, immoral and unethical actions taken against Trump. Can you do that or will you all just keep running your mouths posting BULLS**T?

Dennis
We aren't talking about Jordan etc. are we? This ... (show quote)


All explained simply earlier in this thread. Obviously not to your satisfaction. Too bad! trump will have to be just like everybody else and have his lawyers document and prove prosecutorial misconduct instead of having his lackeys (comer and jordan) do his bidding on fishing expedition paid by my tax dollars. Tell them to get to work legislating and funding instead of infighting and leadership control games.
Go to
May 4, 2024 10:37:24   #
dennis2146 wrote:
Don't you have that link? Seems once again you on the Left bring up much of coulda, shoulda, woulda with nothing except your childish fear, The Boogey Trump will get us when there is no evidence of him doing that at all.

But this is not about Trump pleading his 5th Amendment rights as granted by the Constitution to DEFENDANTS. It is about a Left Winger pleading the 5th who is not a defendant, who as some here have pointed out have no part of this case. Why then would this man plead the 5th Amendment? Why does his doing so give people the thought of something illegal, immoral, unethical having taken place in the prosecution/PERSECUTION of Trump. Surely nobody on the prosecutorial team would be involved in anything relating to those negative terms. Why then is the 5th Amendment even brought up? Why not simply say NO?

Dennis
Don't you have that link? Seems once again you on... (show quote)


You mean like chicken s**ts Jordan, etc. said no and defied a legal subpoena? I already explained the whys that Pomerantz would cooperate with a subpoena and plead the fifth. Your same logic of "why wouldn't they testify if they have nothing to hide" applies to the chicken s**ts Jordan and J6 sympathizers. Sit down.
Go to
May 3, 2024 19:54:15   #
dennis2146 wrote:
All I did was post a video link about Pomerantz claiming the 5th. I don't think I even mentioned Bragg did I? Maybe it is you who is getting mixed up.

Pay attention.

Dennis


You kept referring to Pomerantz by Bragg's title; not by name.
Go to
May 3, 2024 17:58:49   #
Longshadow wrote:
Yes, when copying and moving cells Excel will alter (adjust) the cell references relative to their new location.
If one wants to explicitly use cell "D2" no matter where the cell is copied or moved to, one must reference it as "$D$2". That way the reference to THAT cell will not change.


Yes!
Go to
May 3, 2024 17:57:48   #
dennis2146 wrote:
Has he done so yet? Let me know when he does. You may be correct depending on the questions. Let's not forget Trump is not being prosecuted but more like persecuted only to keep him from running for office. Usually it is the people's choice to determine who runs and who gets elected but of course now the Left is taking on both of those job duties by determining all by themselves who gets to run for e******n.

But HEY!!!!! You have done your typical DEFLECTION bulls**t. We are talking about a district attorney who for some reason is not able to honestly say whether or not he engaged in illegal, immoral or unethical practices to put Trump on trial. If the roles were reversed you would feel exactly as I feel wouldn't you? Are you ethical enough to admit it does look like BULLS**T and unethical dishonest behavior on the part of the Left?

Dennis
Has he done so yet? Let me know when he does. Yo... (show quote)


i think you're getting your people mixed up. It's not Bragg who was subpoenaed. Pomerantz is a former prosecutor and has not been involved in the current trial. He's bound by confidentiality. All you are doing is stirring up what ifs and whatabouts and no evidence of wrong doing; no evidence! Just Jordan's (sought by Bannon) seeking to add noise around the actual court proceedings.
Go to
May 3, 2024 17:49:08   #
dennis2146 wrote:
Just as with Lois Lerner on the stand who claimed the 5th, a district attorney should nave no reason to plead the 5th IF everything was on the up and up in a legal ethical and honest manner. He SHOULD be able to claim all of that without pleading the 5th. Yet he can't. The Left would feel exactly as I do if a Conservative politician or district attorney pleaded the 5th. As a Conservative I would hope my representative could simply answer those questions without the need to claim the 5th. The Left doesn't have the expectation of ethics, morals and honesty as I do. That my BFF is a given.

Dennis
Just as with Lois Lerner on the stand who claimed ... (show quote)


It's all about timing. If the DA has done anything improper, trump gets to file for prosecutorial misconduct. If there's a there there, it will get it's day in court.

Trump and kids and many others are wise to just plead the 5th.

At least he said he respected the authority of the subpoena and he would do his duty. That's more than you can say for the GOP chicken s**ts.

"Earlier this year, the committee issued subpoenas to House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy and four other GOP representatives to testify to the committee about their involvement with Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 e******n: Reps. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, Jim Jordan of Ohio, Andy Biggs of Arizona and Mo Brooks of Alabama. All five ignored the subpoenas."

Guess they figured they'd mess up while invoking the fifth and cause themselves jeopardy.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2022/12/18/january-6-committee-gop-lawmakers-schiff/10920876002/
Go to
May 3, 2024 15:58:52   #
Texcaster wrote:
All the Trumps and most MAGAs are having a very difficult time with the ''adjudicated rapist" ruling in the E Jean Carroll case. And strangely enough, they wear the "pussy grabbing" braggadocio with p***e. Go figure
Trump's latest ... "poor bugger me" ... outburst? "I'm not allowed to testify because of the unconstitutional gag order." He never stops.
All the Trumps and most MAGAs are having a very di... (show quote)


Maybe his lawyers told Trump that so he won't be begging them to put him on the stand.
Go to
May 3, 2024 14:53:26   #
dennis2146 wrote:
https://twitter.com/RepMattGaetz/status/1786003646712270941

Yes we all have a Constitutional Right to plead the 5th Amendment. But in this case it does lead one to wonder why this gentleman would feel the need to plead the 5th Amendment and why he doesn't feel comfortable telling the t***h. I can't help but wonder what the real t***h might be.

Dennis


https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4002288-former-trump-prosecutor-slams-gop-political-theater-takes-the-fifth-at-deposition/

Because it was for a sham of a reason and just for show for the Comer/Jordan/Gaetz kangaroo committee investigation

Because there is an ongoing case of Trump's hush money (same as the premise of Jordan's subpoena), Pomerantz can't comment.

"Pomerantz told lawmakers in his opening statement that he was instructed by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office that he would maintain their “claims of privilege and confidentiality in order to protect the integrity of the pending prosecution and continuing investigation of Donald Trump.”

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/conservative-media-pressure-jim-jordan-launches-new-probe-rcna150546

Media Matters explained in a report this week, “Pro-Trump media figures alleged that Colangelo is a ‘partisan hatchet man’ and claimed that his past service in the Justice Department ... proves that Trump’s indictment was a ‘political hit by Biden to take out Trump.’ In reality, Colangelo had unique experience for Bragg because he led the New York attorney general’s civil inquiry into Trump before joining the Justice Department, and it is not unusual for lawyers to leave DOJ for senior roles in the Manhattan DA’s office.”

Seems like Bannon is calling the shots.
Go to
May 3, 2024 07:57:28   #
FrumCA wrote:
It's a joke you foolish little boy. Unlike the left, I don't purposely practice promoting conspiracy theories.


Yes, you do plus you have a warped sense of what is funny.
Go to
May 2, 2024 15:59:13   #
FrumCA wrote:
Thanks to George Soros.


https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-799583

https://www.wired.com/story/conspiracy-tents-student-protests-gaza/

“Blaming Jews for acting as undercover agents, orchestrating the violence and hatred on college campuses is the latest iteration in the antisemitic denial narrative online, that goes hand-in-hand with fingering Soros as an Israeli agent –blaming the Jews for the violence and hatred aimed at them.” She added, “This is a key pillar of the denialist narrative, meant to justify violence and discrimination against Jewish people.”

You are a useful tool in spreading conspiracy theories. Why?
Go to
May 2, 2024 13:44:41   #
SteveR wrote:
I have sent the file to Longshadow. Hopefully he can figure out what's going on. It HAS been awhile since I used Excel extensively and then I had good manuals. Between it and DbaseIV I had a couple of powerful tools. BUT, it's been awhile.


Good plan.
Go to
May 2, 2024 09:03:30   #
Longshadow wrote:
Well, Office 365 is a bit different that when I created the condition under an older version...

Try:
Conditional Formatting button on the toolbar
select highlight cell rules
select condition (<, >, +, etc.)
enter formatting.

Good luck! It's kinda cryptic.....


I'll report back once I try it.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 642 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.