Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Brucej67
Page: <<prev 1 ... 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 ... 333 next>>
Sep 19, 2012 17:20:14   #
No.

Artsmith wrote:


Thanks for the post & web site. That is one slick bracket, I like how the height of the flash can be changed. Have you had any thing you dislike about it?
Go to
Sep 19, 2012 17:14:18   #
If you can go to a local camera store and try out a RX-100, I know you will like it. Fast shutter response, great menu system like the Alpha and many great features. I am happy with mine.

unclebe1 wrote:
Brucej67 wrote:
Oh, I agree with you and would not trash Sony (I love my Sony Alphas and also my RX-100). I include this photo taken at the fair with my new RX-100, sweet pocket camera.


I'm really interested in the RX-100 and would love to see more results and hear your thoughts about it (strengths and weaknesses). My current pocket camera is the Canon 90 Powershot, which is showing its age and is ready for replacement.
Go to
Sep 19, 2012 06:43:02   #
Oh, I agree with you and would not trash Sony (I love my Sony Alphas and also my RX-100). I include this photo taken at the fair with my new RX-100, sweet pocket camera.

Peekayoh wrote:
It's true that Sony has a proprietary flash, but it's also true that everyone else has a propriety shoe as well. Canon flash will mount on a Nikon but you can't use it, same with Nikon and same with Sony. Why do people go looking for reasons to trash Sony (or anyone else) without the facts.

I would endorse what Flashgordonbrown said, there is no bad DSLR out there and they will all respond to good user input with very good images.

If you want real innovation with your camera, then Sony is the brand making all the waves at the moment. NEX cameras, RX-100, RX-1, Sony SLT, in partnership with Zeiss and offering excellent lenses and we now hear that Hasselblad are joining with Sony to use Sony technology and to adopt the "e" and a-mount. Interesting times.

The OP askes about the a77, this is a brilliant camera and in my prejudiced view (I have a900 and a77 and NEX-7) leaves the competition playing catch up. Not that it is streets ahead in IQ (it is better) but the on camera controls which make it easier for the user to achieve the required result are unmatched. I'm thinking principally of the WYSIWYG EVF which effectively means you never again will need to "chimp", histogram or level available in the EVF, focus peaking which highlights in focus areas and a "focus magnify" function for critical final focus tweaking.

I didn't choose Sony in that I come from Minolta roots and Sony was the inevitable progression from that, but now I am very pleased to be with Sony. Sony is not perfect but who is?
It's true that Sony has a proprietary flash, but i... (show quote)

My grandchildren and their mother

Go to
Sep 19, 2012 06:36:26   #
Yea, he is weird looking and the only negative with the outfit is if you use a power grip on the camera it doesn't keep the lens vertical with the flash.

jerryc41 wrote:

I've seen that guy before. He needs help with his videos. His shirt and the background blend right in together, and what's with the hair and the hat?
Go to
Sep 19, 2012 06:14:14   #
Here is the one I use: http://www.alzodigital.com/online_store/selection_flash_bracket_kits.htm
Go to
Sep 19, 2012 06:03:09   #
L-Bracket off camera flash, eliminate red-eye, maybe. :?:

jerryc41 wrote:
I know what an L bracket is, but I don't understand how it's different from just rotating the camera 90 degrees with the tripod head.
Go to
Sep 18, 2012 13:14:37   #
I have tried every adapter I could get my hands on and still can't get my Nikon SB-910 and SB-700 to work on Sony Alpha cameras or visa-versa.

flashgordonbrown wrote:

Actually, with a fairly cheap adapter, you can put any flash or shoe accessory on a sony dslr. As for limits to lens selection and other accessories, only the very most specialized items might be hard to come by in a sony version. I'm not sure where you come up with the reliability issue-it is a non issue. As you may be aware the imaging chips in most nikon dslrs are made by sony. As a former retail photo equipment salesperson, I can tell you there is not a penny's worth of difference in the end results that you are able to attain among all of the brands of dslr. It comes down to your prejudices(primarily) going in and how it feels in your hands. For the record I doubt that any of us, from the most experienced pro to the rankest beginner, utilize more than a tiny percentage of the capabilities of our chosen camera.
br Actually, with a fairly cheap adapter, you can... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 18, 2012 05:57:02   #
Beside Nikon cameras (D800, D7000 and D2X) I own Sony cameras (A900, A850, A700 and A77) so I can speak from experience. The A77 is unlike your DSLR it is an SLT camera with some amazing features. While it is recognized that Sony is not the leading manufacturer in the camera industry like Nikon and Canon, Sony produces great equipment (Nikon also uses Sony sensors). Now to your questions:
1. Camera preference is an individual choice, but if you were to choose Sony cameras you would not be disappointed with the performance of the A77. As far as lens for the A77, Sony has "G" and Zeiss lenses that range in the same price as some top Nikon and Canon lenses and their lens is excellent. Sony also carries lower price lenses. Sigma and Tamron both make lens for Sony. I agree with one of the respondents, you must handle one first either rent or go to a camera shop to know if it is right for you.
2. I use Photoshop CS6 (and have used CS4 and CS5) without problems with ARW (Sony RAW files). Adobe Camera Raw is up-to-date on all Sony cameras except the A99 and RX-100 as these are brand new.
Hope this helps you.


nsainato wrote:
At the present time I am using Canon EOS 60. I am a new photo enthusiast and can not say I am good at it. But I am impressed with Sony a77, to me it seems like Sony does a better job and I am thinking of purchasing and switching to Sony. Thus I have couple of questions from the experts.
1. Can you download Raw files from Sony to Photoshop?
2. Is there a big difference in performance between the two brands? or am I going to waste my mony?
Your input is greatly appreciated.
Nadia
Go to
Sep 17, 2012 09:15:14   #
Love these myself, nice shot. I post mine for you to see.


Go to
Sep 13, 2012 18:12:53   #
I agree with you for the most part. I own the Nikon D800 (which I believe you are right “same sensor”) however in order to cram that many megapixels on the camera they had to improve the software for processing the image and that makes the D800 slow, however it does a good job of noise reduction at high ISO. Both the D800 and the A99 are boasting 14 bit channels which puts it in a class with medium format cameras for color representation. The only advantage of the large megapixels on the D800 is cropping or extreme poster size blowups.
I realize that the sensor is full frame on the A99 versus the APS-C A77; however the remaining features are more akin to the A77 which was their top of the line SLT. From my standpoint I wish the A99 was a DSLR rather than SLT, every time I am in the field changing lens on the A77 in windy weather I cringe just thinking that dust will get on the translucent component and scratch the coating. Don’t get me wrong I like my A77 just treat it with more kid gloves than my other cameras.


tainkc wrote:
For most of us the answer to your question is probably not. As a matter of fact, for normal size photos, I see no improvement of the Nikon d800 over my Sony a580. However, when you get into the fine scale of things, there is quite a difference but mine is more than adequate for what I do.

I do like the fact that the a99 is updated from the a900. You do realize that the sensor being full frame, is different than the a77 even though they have basically the same megapixel count. I also like the fact that they held it down to 24mp vs. the d800's 36mp which I understand is the same sensor. I may be wrong here. But with 24mp on that size sensor, they are not trying to cram as much information on to the sensor as would they have with 36 mp. This should result in better color representation at the least.

A good example of this is with the a500 12mp camera vs. the a550 14mp camera. They both have the exact same sensor but they found that the picture quality on the a500 was much better than the a550 because just by adding a little more to the sensor degraded the picture quality just enough to be noticeable. Just goes to prove once again that less is sometimes more.

Sony now has it listed on their website complete with specifications. It is also geared better for movie making along with the expensive accessories that go along with video.

But if Sony has done their homework correctly like they usually do, the a99 ought to be dynamite. At that price it better be.
For most of us the answer to your question is prob... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 13, 2012 10:10:22   #
I forgot to mention that I picked up a Sony RX-100 just to have with me all the time when I am not lugging a DSLR. It is a great camera with almost all the features of my DSLR's except interchangeable lens. It is compact enough to carry in a shirt sleeve pocket and is rated just above 20 megapixels.

Davethehiker wrote:
Brucej67 wrote:
One item that I looked for was the weather seal like they put on the A77, not sure that the A99 has it,
I own the A700, A850, A900 and A77 so I don't see an A99 in my future.


Wow Bruce, an A900 and an A850?! That seems a bit redundant. Sony must love you.

I saw a film clip on the Internet saying that the A99 is weather sealed. They had at a prototype at motorcycle race. The camera was covered with dust and the user said it not a problem because of the weather seal.

I only have the A100 and my A900 but you would not believe the lenses I have collected over the years!:

Sony:A100,A900|18~70 f3.5~5.6 DT|11~18 f4.5~5.6 DT| 24-70 f2.8 ZA SSM|50 f1.4|100 f2.8 Macro|70-300 f4.5~5.6 G SSM|300mm f2.8 G w/2X Teleconverter|500 f8 Reflex

Flashes:HVL-F56AM (2 qty) HVL-F58AM (3 qty) HVL-F20AM

Minolta:28 f2.8|35~70 f4 (qty2)|135 f2.8|100~200 f4.5

Sigma:12~24 f4.5~5.6 DG|28~105 f2.8~4|70~300 f4~5.6 Macro|400 f5.6

BTW, I'm not sure if the A99 has a GPS built into it or not? I looks to me like a port where you can plug a GPS into. I would like that.

Edit----------------------
I just found this rather comprehensive description of the A99:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/sony-a99/sony-a99A.HTM
quote=Brucej67 One item that I looked for was the... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 13, 2012 10:04:15   #
For the most part true, however I also have Nikon cameras with Nikon 24-70mm 2.8 ($1,999), Nikon 70-200mm 2.8 ($2,300) and Nikon 14-24mm 2.8 ($1,800), Nikon 105mm 2.8 macro ($900) as well as an assortment of Nikon primes and a Sigma 50-500mm ($1,500). Now how can I afford to furnish my Sony with great lens on retirement income? When doing professional photography you better have a backup camera body or you can get yourself in trouble.

perpoto wrote:
INVEST IN LENS not CAMERA
Go to
Sep 13, 2012 07:09:30   #
I agree with you. The way the manufacturers of cameras are updating their line of cameras is in some way like the computer manufacturers update their computers, the moment you buy the item it is obsolete because a newer one has just come out.

Davethehiker wrote:
Does anyone understand the rumored "dual mount hybrid" (Alpha and E-mount), full frame camera that is said to be coming in 2013? I believe that such a camera is coming, but I wonder if old legacy 35mm lenses will work on them as full frame lenses or will they be restricted/limited to the APS-C portion of the imaging array?

I can see some advantages that the A99 has over my current A900 but when I read that a 36MP camera that will accept both Nex and Alpha lenses with an adapter, is coming soon, I can't justify spend money on something that will soon be obsoleted.

I have a drawer full of wonderful old Konica lenses that I would love to put back to work.
Does anyone understand the rumored "dual moun... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 12, 2012 16:12:39   #
Thanks, I just peeked at the site looks interesting. I purchased the A850 as a backup to my A900 when I was trying to go professional. The A700 was an earlier model and the A77 couldn’t resist getting into SLT. The A99 looks great but on a retirement budget I just can't justify it. I also own 3 Nikon cameras (D2X, D7000 and the D800) along with some pretty expensive lenses and flashes. My lenses for the Sony line are high level Tamron and Sigma. If I could afford it I would opt for the Zeiss Icon lens, but then I would need to be making money in the field and not just a hobby.

"Wow Bruce, an A900 and an A850?! That seems a bit redundant. Sony must love you.

I saw a film clip on the Internet saying that the A99 is weather sealed. They had at a prototype at motorcycle race. The camera was covered with dust and the user said it not a problem because of the weather seal.

I only have the A100 and my A900 but you would not believe the lenses I have collected over the years!:

Sony:A100,A900|18~70 f3.5~5.6 DT|11~18 f4.5~5.6 DT| 24-70 f2.8 ZA SSM|50 f1.4|100 f2.8 Macro|70-300 f4.5~5.6 G SSM|300mm f2.8 G w/2X Teleconverter|500 f8 Reflex

Flashes:HVL-F56AM (2 qty) HVL-F58AM (3 qty) HVL-F20AM

Minolta:28 f2.8|35~70 f4 (qty2)|135 f2.8|100~200 f4.5

Sigma:12~24 f4.5~5.6 DG|28~105 f2.8~4|70~300 f4~5.6 Macro|400 f5.6

BTW, I'm not sure if the A99 has a GPS built into it or not? I looks to me like a port where you can plug a GPS into. I would like that.

Edit----------------------
I just found this rather comprehensive description of the A99:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/sony-a99/sony-a99A.HTM"
Go to
Sep 12, 2012 14:19:35   #
One item that I looked for was the weather seal like they put on the A77, not sure that the A99 has it, the A99 looks more like the A55 in that respect. One of the advantages of the A99 is the move to 14 color channels over the 12 in the other cameras. Keeping the 24 megapixels on the full frame sensor should prove good for noise to high ISO levels. I don't see enough improvements to justify moving from the A77 to the A99. I own the A700, A850, A900 and A77 so I don't see an A99 in my future.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 ... 333 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.