LOL!

[quote=Texcaster]
O. J. Simpson was also found "not guilty" in the same era.

This would have been admirable if the press did the same reporting on the Obama administration's lies and deceptions. As it is, they are only reporting on Trump's fibs because they don't like Republicans. They are now even making stuff up out of thin air to try to denigrate Trump.


CIA chief John Brennan, National Intelligence Director James Clapper, Senator Diane Feinstein who sits on the Intelligence committee, have all publicly said there is no evidence at all of Trump collusion with Russia. And these are the Democrats! When Sally Yates testified before Congress after a huge build-up of expectations, not a single Democrat Senator even bothered to ask her if she knew of any evidence. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/23/gowdy_grills_john_brennan_do_you_have_evidence_of_trump-russia_collusion_or_not_brennan_i_dont_do_evidence.html

Don't you think that with all the mega leaking going on that some little chink of evidence or even a whisper by some "anonymous" official would have been leaked to the public by now. The hungry sharks in the press would have devoured this information like alligators in a meat house. There is not even a mere allegation of wh**ever the hell Trump did to collude.

Democrats are going to regret ever clinging onto this f**e story. I already see them trying to lower expectations by citing the "ongoing investigation where the public will have to sit back and wait in silence" as a way of avoiding having to talk about the substance anymore. When it is finally debunked, the shocked Democrats, unable to accept the evidence, will spawn numerous conspiracy theories of why it was covered up. I can't wait.

Yes, they are!

For one, Hillary would have aligned with Putin and Russia, and would not have sent a big scare into Syria. She made a big public showing as Secretary of State by pushing a symbolic "reset button" with the Russian Ambassador to show that we are in a new era of cooperation with the Russkies. This, on top of her okaying a deal with a uranium mining company that put 20% of U.S. uranium deposits in Russian control.

To add to this, one of Obama's re-e******n issues was that he was a supporter of Russia while Romney was warning us that the Russkies were one of our greatest threats. Of course, Romney was openly mocked by Democrats for suggesting such a thing.

This is not only correct, but on top of it, former Assistant Secretary of State Tony Blinken admitted that the administration knew all along that Syria did not get rid of its chemical weapons according to "the deal" and lied about it to the public.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/04/10/former-top-obama-official-admits-we-always-knew-syria-still-had-chemical-weapons-lied-anyway/

But this is a contradiction. If Germany steps up its defenses then NATO will be strengthened, not weakened.

You are correct! I could care less what someone in Germany thinks about our president or about America. My parents and school teachers used to teach us kids that being "popular" was a shallow goal to attain in life. Standing up for good principles was supposed to be more important, even if others disagreed with you. I also know that with all the constant complaining and griping that you hear about America, coming mostly from other affluent Western Countries, we are still the place where everybody else wants to live. We are kind of like the Wal-Mart of the World - because we are the most successful, we get all the complaints, while minor Hell Holes like Haiti and Central African Republic remain invisible.

And you think this is a bad thing? It might be that Trump is right to shame Nato members into taking more responsibility for defense. I thought that Liberals like you were against the U.S. taking the dominant role in World military affairs, no?

It makes them feel good to pursue such nonsense. Without the conspiracies, where else could they go for comfort?

It is frighteningly appropriate that your avatar is Homer Simpson at the controls of a nuclear reactor.

What is there exactly to rebut? It is a newspaper article written in Germany by a man who gives his opinion that he doesn't like Trump. The author makes no fact claims, just a list of his dislikes. I don't think many Americans are losing sleep over this.

Oh, they have? Ask some of the French and Britains about that.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/germany-r****m-racial-stereotype-african-descent-black-united-nations-un-police-authorities-customs-a7603771.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/30/opinion/the-new-face-of-r****m-in-germany.html?_r=0