Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: DebAnn
Page: <<prev 1 ... 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 ... 462 next>>
Jul 7, 2018 07:07:56   #
Grandpaw, that's a good one!
grandpaw wrote:
Taken with my Nikon 70-300mm lens
Go to
Jul 7, 2018 07:05:40   #
Beautiful!
Pixelmaster wrote:
After a week of heat the Hollyhocks are in bloom.
Go to
Jul 6, 2018 07:42:27   #
Wow, that's really something. He looks like an art installation.
grandpaw wrote:
And I ate the whole thing, all by myself!!!
Go to
Jul 6, 2018 07:40:11   #
On this post you have seen a lot of technical information on why you should get this over that etc. To answer your specific question, I can tell you that I own a 70D and have had it since it was introduced. It may be 5 years old but regardless of the fact that there is new technology out there, the 70D is an excellent camera that produces great results. I don't have any plans to dump it anytime soon. If you've narrowed down your search to a 70D, I say "go for it". I don't think you'll be sorry.
kashka51 wrote:
I currently own a Canon T5i. I am looking to own a second camera so as not to have to change lenses so often. I was wondering what your thoughts are on the Canon 70D. It is affordable for me especially as used at Cameta Adorama and B&H Photo. Thanks for your input!
Go to
Jul 6, 2018 07:29:31   #
Funny, I was just reading a book that said APS-C is better for landscapes due to increased depth of field at 1 stop lower than would be possible with an FF. Same source said FF is better for portraits. However, I can attest to the fact that I get excellent results on my APS-C (70D) for both when using the right lenses. Specifically for the person who started this post, I have a T3i which has proven to be an excellent camera - some of my best photos were shot with this camera and I do mainly portraits of one kind or another. I upgraded to the 70D which is also wonderful. This has now been replaced with the 80D so I have no reason not to believe it's even better. From your comments, I don't think you need go to the expense of an FF. If you do decide to move up, have you considered the Canon 6D Mk II?
6
PHRubin wrote:
Your first decision is APS-C or FF. Either will do well for portraits. FF is better at landscape, but APS-C can work. For sports I'd say APS-C only due to the reach and the expense of getting reach with lenses on a FF.

If you decide APS-C, the first question is WHAT IS LACKING WITH THE T3I? I have a T2i and it works fine for most shots. Yes my 80D can do more, but it is rare I encounter those situations. For most cases the T2i is fine.

If you are still working out kinks by trial and error, I think you should stay with the T3i until you can find what it can't do for you that something newer can.

If $ is no object, get one of each!

What you haven't told us is what lenses you have. Do they limit you?
Your first decision is APS-C or FF. Either will do... (show quote)
Go to
Jul 5, 2018 16:23:02   #
Thanks for tuning in - I'm sorry you had a death in the family to contend with.

I always shoot in raw and process in Lightroom. Between us, my sister and I have great L lenses so I think we'll have it covered, thanks to the advice received on the Hog. I will post pics after the event (for critique of course).
bkyser wrote:
All, Sorry for the delay in answering here. (death in the family)
Very good advice. If you are shooting raw, you are pretty covered, and can easily correct the color. If you are a JPEG shooter, then I would suggest a custom white balance to start, then fine tune in post.

As was said, one of the main things in a darkly lit church, is to take control, and stop people as they come down the aisle for a quick shot to avoid motion blur. Noise is perfectly acceptable, even though people tend to freak out about it. Shoot, if it was that awful, there wouldn't be an "add noise" filter in photoshop. If anything, if it is there, don't apologize for it, consider it a "film look". Using 800,1000, or 1600, or pushing a lower iso like 400, would result in noise (grain) in the film days, and it was, what it was.
All, Sorry for the delay in answering here. (deat... (show quote)
Go to
Jul 5, 2018 07:31:44   #
Beautiful!
jwm1944 wrote:
The Piedmont of central Maryland
Go to
Jul 5, 2018 07:31:00   #
The B&W is wonderful.
Greg Huntsinger wrote:
BW
Go to
Jul 5, 2018 07:28:23   #
Love it!
Treepusher wrote:
Madame P loves to sing, and, as anyone from the Ministry of Mayhem can tell you, her voice is hypnotic.
Go to
Jul 5, 2018 07:27:23   #
Really great street photography.
docphoto wrote:
My first visit to Krakow has been very interesting and challenging photographically. Initially, it was cloudy and rainy the first few days but now it's sunny and the streets are lined with many different "faces." I tried to capture the essence of the culture by photographing their faces as they play or walk the street. In my opinion, black & white photography captures the intensity and meaning of the photograph. Please download for best results. I welcome your comments. (By the way, these were shot with either the NIKON D5 or D850, NIKKOR 70-200mm 2.8 AF-S or the NIKKOR 14-24mm 4.0. ISO varied btw 200-400)
My first visit to Krakow has been very interesting... (show quote)
Go to
Jul 4, 2018 11:25:23   #
Try phoning Microsoft and getting them to take over the problem computer and reloading the software. They did it for me.
jerryc41 wrote:
Yeah, Windows updates can be killers. An update a few months ago messed up the Win10 on an older desktop, so new it's a decoration. My only choice is to buy a new copy of Windows 10.
Go to
Jul 4, 2018 11:17:31   #
He's a handsome cat for sure. But why did they need to clip his ear signifying he's a male? Or is just so they'll know they already castrated this one?
kgoerg wrote:
My wife and I are animal lovers (that's putting it mildly). We recently had a visit from a local feral cat. We put food out for him but can't get within 20 yards so getting a decent picture of him was a challenge. I recently got my 80-400mm Nikon lens and got these shots. If you notice, his left ear is cropped slightly. Our friend, a veterinarian, explained. He had been trapped before, castrated (I won't say "fixed" because if he was fixed he'd still work), and the left ear clipped to signify he's a male. He is quite handsome.
My wife and I are animal lovers (that's putting it... (show quote)
Go to
Jul 4, 2018 11:04:02   #
Great shots of a beautiful place, Alex.
AlexS wrote:
One of our favorite places in Paris.
Go to
Jul 4, 2018 09:52:40   #
I've done that before as well - told the wedding party before they entered that I'd be gesturing for a stop a few steps into the aisle and it worked out fine.
Beercat wrote:
I meant to say shutter priority during the processional and then switch back to aperture priority once everyone was in their places. I remember one time in a very dark Mission when it was very dark outside that I had each bridesmaid, flower girl and the Bride/father stop halfway down the corridor upon my hand gesture, then let everyone admire them (about 5 seconds) and then I would gesture them to continue their walk. During that 5 seconds I would fire off about 3 pictures and of the shutter could be very slow, usually around 1/30. It worked fine and frankly it was nice to have that 5 seconds so everyone could enjoy having a good look, so often wedding parties zip down the processional way to fast ;)
I meant to say shutter priority during the process... (show quote)
Go to
Jul 4, 2018 07:15:16   #
Thanks BC. That's very helpful. I generally shoot in aperture priority as well but I'll give your system a try in the church. I don't usually have any issues with weddings (I only shoot family weddings). But this one includes a niece (bride) who has very precise ideas about how the wedding is going to proceed. A bit like a sergeant major! This includes having most of the photos done before the ceremony in the early afternoon, in wide open spaces overlooking a beach. I'm hoping the day will be somewhat overcast. My sister and I do have big reflectors and powerful flash equipment - and good Canon cameras/lenses. Besides the church venue and the open spaces, we have the bride's wedding group getting ready on one side of the Margaree River and groom's party on the other side - so there will be quite a bit of running around. I expect I'll be exhausted after this one! I'm looking forward to the next wedding in October which will be held in one venue in an old downtown building. The bride is open to an industrial-type streetscape background for some of the photos which should be fun. Thanks again.
Deb
Beercat wrote:
Deb ....

Your a pro so you know that you play it safe during the ceremony. I prefer aperture mode most of the time but when I'm in a church with low to moderate lighting and I can't use flash I always go to shutter priority and auto ISO with a cap of 3200 during the o. I set the shutter to 1/80 at 50mm. Typically I find my Canon edging close to wide open, usually f/2 - f/3.2 which works just fine. As Ed mentioned a bit of grain during the ceremony is fine. Once everyone is in their places I'll switch to aperture priority with the ISO set to auto.

That is what I do in low lit churches and I've never had an issue.
Deb .... br br Your a pro so you know that you p... (show quote)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 ... 462 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.