Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Steven Seward
Page: <<prev 1 ... 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 ... 437 next>>
Jun 1, 2017 01:30:13   #
gmcase wrote:
Blurry - he has been suffering from increasing levels of dementia for some time and I am not kidding. Obvious symptons. Best to ignore the old fool or wave him off with a few words here and there.

I think you might seriously be right.
Go to
Jun 1, 2017 01:27:15   #
mwalsh wrote:
People do not piss on your mouth because you are a liberal....

You are correct, Sir!
Go to
Jun 1, 2017 01:19:46   #
Texcaster wrote:
Are you trying to get on the Colbert payroll again?

LOL!
Go to
Jun 1, 2017 01:17:11   #
btbg wrote:
Unemployment was at 4.7 percent because the government in their infinite wisdom don't count people who quit looking for work. While the unemployment rate is officially low, the number of people in the work force was at an all time low from a percentage standpoint. Statistics are a wonderful thing. You can make them say anything you want them too.

As far as our status internationally there was a post on one of the other threads about two days ago decrying Trump because he has hurt our favorability in Germany. Interestingly the op ed pointed out that our approval rating in Germany went from 76 percent to 24 percent during the Obama administration.

Add in how well Trump was received in Saudi Arabia and in Israel and it certainly doesn't look like Obama was that well thought of world wide.
Unemployment was at 4.7 percent because the govern... (show quote)

I have come to distrust the official unemployment number for the exact reason you stated. The much more telling number is the Labor Participation Rate. It is the number that shows the percentage of the working-age population that is actually at work. This dropped under Obama from 66% to 62%, making it our lowest participation rate since the 1970's. The reason is that we are literally paying tens of millions of people not to work, by handing out welfare to anybody who wants it. This would include the Keen guy who snipes at your comments with incoherent ramblings.
Go to
Jun 1, 2017 01:07:18   #
btbg wrote:
Well, Bork immediately comes to mind if you are questioning my knowledge of history. And look at how many Republicans v**ed for both of Obamas supreme court appointees. Both of whom I view as unfit to serve on the court because they don't take the constitution literally.

And as far as false equivalency when you adapt the nuclear option whether it is for appeals courts or the supreme court the end result is the same.

As far as Biden it wasn't political posturing. He clearly meant it as did his compatriots. I agree with you that the Republicans adapting the nuclear option is not a very good idea. But it was a bad idea when Reid did it too.

You are right that obstructionism in the past didn't take place at this level, but you have some factual difficulties. It should be pointed out that Obama accomplished virtually all of his political objectives and made no effort to work in a bipartisan way. Now when the Republicans look like they may try to do the same thing you seem horribly offended.

Both sides are wrong, and although two wrongs don't make a right, what would you suggest Republicans do regarding the affordable care act. It was crammed down our throats with the famous quote we have to pass it so that we can see what's in it. It is going to bankrupt us if something isn't changed.

The cost is being born by the states. Example, Oregon has a projected 1 billion dollar shortfall for the next biennium even though tax revenue is the highest in history. Why? because of the Public Employees Retirement System and government entitlement programs, many of which are mandated by the feds. Example Medicaid and what used to be called food stamps.

The tax and spend policies of the last 12 years, because yes Bush was guilty of it too are bankrupting our country, yet Democrats just want to keep spending money and increasing taxes. As a taxpayer I'm fed up with it. I despise Trump, but at least he gets that we already pay too much in taxes and keep too little of what we work for.
Well, Bork immediately comes to mind if you are qu... (show quote)

Go to
May 31, 2017 20:56:15   #
Steven Seward wrote:
It has become a pointless exercise responding to this guy. You would have more success responding to a toad.

Keenan wrote:
We are in agreement regarding Blurry. It truly has become a pointless exercise responding to this Blurrbrain moron. He is living in his own make believe world, where up is down and down is up. Poor guy.

Are you so ignorant that you think I was talking about Blurry? I was talking to Blurry about you.
Go to
May 31, 2017 20:52:20   #
nakkh wrote:
Trump’s worst slaughter of civilians is the March 17, 2017 US airstrike on west Mosul in Iraq which k**led 200+ civilians. The Iraqi government had told the residents of Mosul, then under occupation by ISIS, to remain indoors. The US knew or ought to have known west Mosul’s residents were in harm’s way.

Why does everybody else, including Al Jazeera, report only 105 deaths?

http://www.google.com/#q=strike+on+mosul+k**ls+civilians&start=0
Go to
May 31, 2017 19:21:19   #
nakkh wrote:
The US is blowing up innocent women and children with poorly executed (Trump) drone strikes.

Wow! This is outrageous! This would have never happened under Barak Obama.
Go to
May 31, 2017 19:19:02   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
Tom refuses to acknowledge the t***h, he thinks that by slighting me as he does he somehow gains superiority.... Tom is an alt-left, he will never speak rationally on issues or acknowledge deficiencies in his own position. He lives in the bubble of liberalism and to him there can be no other t***h than the one he read about in the NYT, the Washington Post or some obscure website such as VOX, Wonkette, or Politicususa.

It has become a pointless exercise responding to this guy. You would have more success responding to a toad.
Go to
May 31, 2017 18:43:45   #
mwalsh wrote:
"his absence?"

You mean the abscess? The large red inflamed boil that when punctured spews foul smelling puss fluids?

I too have finally joined the "Krap on Keenan" crowd. You are being too kind.
Go to
May 31, 2017 18:22:32   #
mwalsh wrote:
It did not take long for Cupcakes to show back up.


There you go again, failing at putting words in my mouth. Keep trying.

We saw a brief glimpse of the rational Keenan, but Cupcakes is a tenacious little s**t.

I feel your pain!
Go to
May 31, 2017 17:50:01   #
thom w wrote:
Do you have an article from even one reputable publication stating that? To the best of my knowledge her server was not hacked.

Here is an early report about hacking attempts from China, South Korea, and Germany:
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/hillary-clinton-email-server-hacked-china-south-korea-germany-214546

Here is a story from the New York Times when the FBI first revealed that her emails were hacked:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/07/us/hillary-clintons-email-was-probably-hacked-experts-say.html?_r=0

Here the FBI is 99% certain that at least five foreign countries have hacked Hillary's E-mails:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/11/03/former-federal-prosecutor-why-did-doj-limit-and-discourage-fbis-clinton-foundation-probe-n2240856

Finally, wired magazine gives a more technical explanation of why her E-mails were so easy to hack:
http://www.wired.com/2015/03/clintons-email-server-vulnerable/

My own thoughts: The Democrats were zealously certain that the DNC was hacked by Russian agents, but continued to deny that Hillary had been hacked by anybody at all. The big elephant in the room however, is that the DNC had normal security measures on their systems, while Hillary did not. Any Google or Yahoo E-mail account had much more security than did Hillary's. It has been suggested that amateurs could have hacked into Hillary's account and may well have done so.
Go to
May 31, 2017 17:09:54   #
thom w wrote:
When Bush Sr. tricked Saddam into going into Kuwait, the rest of NATO didn't tell us we were on our own.

This is a new one on me! I have never seen the invasion of Kuwait blamed on Bush Senior before.
Go to
May 31, 2017 17:03:03   #
StevenSeward wrote:
I also know that with all the constant complaining and griping that you hear about America, coming mostly from other affluent Western Countries, we are still the place where everybody else wants to live.

thom w wrote:
Because we have the longest life expectancy? Because we have the best education system. Because Americans are the happiest people on earth? Because we get the longest vacations?
None of those is true.

Then why do you think everybody else wants to live here? It seems to be a mystery to people on the left.
Go to
May 31, 2017 16:57:08   #
Frosty wrote:
Here is a letter to the editor from th Minneapolis paper concerning Trump and Germany.

TRUMP’S FOREIGN TOUR

A new world order, with beacon of hope shining elsewhere

In the wake of President Trump’s recent visit, German Chancellor Angela Merkel concluded that “we Europeans must really take our fate into our own hands.” Meaning that the U.S. is no longer an ally in Europe’s quest for peace and security (and environmental sanity). For me, this comment brought home the overarching significance of the Trump administration: The roles of Europe and the U.S. have been inverted. Our national identity has been shaped by the idea that we are the beacon of reason and justice — the answer to Europe’s dark legacy of autocracy, tribalism and religious conflict. Sure, this was partly delusional (see s***ery, Jim Crow, Native American history), but it held some deeper t***h — at least in our aspirations, we were different.

But no more. The United States that Donald Trump and Steve Bannon envision is a dark, closed and frightening place. Germany — Germany! — once the heart of darkness, is now the shining city on the hill. In effect, Europe (at least the core led by Germany and France) is now the beacon of hope for us all. The old world has become the new one. It’s shocking, and unbearably sad, but I guess I should take comfort in knowing that, just as my ancestors maintained hope by looking across the Atlantic, I can do the same — looking in the opposite direction.
********

The Germans are smarter than trump...
Here is a letter to the editor from th Minneapolis... (show quote)

Hey Frosty, I thought most Democrats were against the U.S. being the policemen of the World. Your post seems to indicate otherwise. What say you?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 ... 437 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.