Dirtbag wrote:
An you believe the one that is an has told more lies than hillary had ever fold.
dennis2146 wrote:
WHAT????
Dennis
Pay no attention. That guy is borderline illiterate. Guess which Party he supports?
Texcaster wrote:
The raw material is very good these days, everyone wants to have a go.
I like your use of the word "material." That is the same term that comedians use!
Architect1776 wrote:
Hey numbnuts, no one ever said he was.
Only f**e liberal news said it. The President didn't.
It was debunked all day today. As only i***ts would believe such crap about the firing.
These i***ts keep chasing f**e news stories like little children. I guess they got nothing else to fall back on.
I tried warning some of these clowns on HedgeHog not to get their hopes up regarding the "Russian collusion" story. It has been obvious for many months that the whole thing was just made up out of thin air. All I got back were scornful replies telling me that I was "ignoring" all the facts, and that I'm a right-wing nut-job wedded to Fox News and such. The same people who kept saying over and over that Hillary was a total shoe-in for President. What a bunch of B.S.
I am really curious what our friends on the left have to say about this. They are always praising Europe for being better and smarter than America.
This is not the only story that has been totally debunked lately. The news media has become a joke. It is on the same level as those supermarket tabloids that no serious person bothers to read. I've never paid much attention to news media in the first place, and like Gomez Addams, I am enjoying watching the train wreck unfold before my eyes.
Frosty wrote:
How so? How does breathing 100 percent oxygen k**l you. I have done it many of times in. aircraft including pressure breathing of 100 percent oxygen. Of course plants need CO2. We breath in oxygen an exhale CO2.
Believe it or not, you can get toxic poisoning from too much oxygen, though most deaths to humans occur only when it happens underwater.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen_toxicity
user47602 wrote:
so what if it's only 100,000 early deaths? 50,000? 10,000? how does that compare to our response to terrorism? that's only 6 Americans per year.
Well, you try to convince the average American that we should relax our defenses against terrorists, and concentrate more on air pollution. No politician would dare.
thom w wrote:
What do you think a judge should be paid? Do you want only attorneys who can't find other work to become judges?
It wasn't the size of her salary that I was upset about. It was the fact that she was still receiving it after being removed from the bench and fleeing the country! She is essentially being rewarded with a paid vacation.
thom w wrote:
Before we invaded the average citizen could go to the store for a loaf of bread without getting k**led.
As you know, I don't try to insult people on this forum, but I got to say that you and Welheim are grossly misinformed about what went on in Iraq before we invaded. I purposely pulled a New York Times article from the beginning of the war when we didn't yet know all the atrocities that Saddam committed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/26/weekinreview/the-world-how-many-people-has-hussein-k**led.htmlAfter reading this, you decide whether it was safe to go out and buy a loaf of bread in Iraq, or do anything for that matter. As time went on and the U.S. Army began excavating the mass graves left by Saddam, the numbers of dead climbed to these approximately figures:
Civilian Executions - 600,000+
Deaths in the needless war with Iran - 500,000
Kurdish eradication - 100,000+
Deaths from invasion of Kuwait - 100,000
The civilian k*****gs apart from the war deaths average between 75-125 people per day of every single day in Saddam's reign, depending on the estimates.
http://wais.stanford.edu/Iraq/iraq_deathsundersaddamhussein42503.htmlIf you have a sadistic fascination with torture, you might enjoy this article from Wikipedia. Scroll ahead to the subtitle "Other Atrocities"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Saddam_Hussein%27s_Iraq
chrisscholbe wrote:
How about we keep them that way.
How do you think we got to this point? by industry voluntarily reducing the pollutants they spew into the air?
I think not.
How about you put yourself in a closed room and breath only CO2, then tell us it's not toxic?
You would k**l yourself by doing the same thing with oxygen. Air must be a balanced mixture to sustain life.