Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: yssirk123
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 next>>
Feb 21, 2017 09:31:14   #
mickeys wrote:
Nice shot
👍👍👍


Thanks for commenting mickeys!
Go to
Feb 21, 2017 09:30:43   #
Longshadow wrote:


Thanks for looking Longshadow!
Go to
Feb 21, 2017 09:27:41   #
Murex wrote:
I think it looks like a painting. Well-done with excellent composition. Definitely stress relieving. I would like to see it on canvas.


Thanks for looking Murex! I hadn't thought about a canvas, but you're right - this might be a good candidate for canvas.
Go to
Feb 21, 2017 09:24:58   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Wow!


Thanks for commenting jerryc41!
Go to
Feb 21, 2017 09:24:28   #
tracs101 wrote:
Looks great to me.


Thanks for commenting tracs101!
Go to
Feb 21, 2017 07:33:21   #
Had a chance to try a new ND filter on the beach.


(Download)
Go to
Feb 16, 2017 07:54:12   #
Thanks Sue. It was a beautiful day.
Go to
Feb 15, 2017 15:11:40   #
vicksart wrote:
Looks good.

Thanks for looking Vicki
Go to
Feb 15, 2017 08:16:17   #
rmm0605 wrote:
It's a very nice wide angle shot. By crop, you mean DX format?

Thanks for looking! By crop, I mean I took a horizontal slice out of the overall image to get the aspect I liked best.
Go to
Feb 14, 2017 16:12:45   #
Bobspez wrote:
Personally, I'd like more sky.

Thanks for looking. I played around alot with different crops, some leaving more sky.
Go to
Feb 14, 2017 16:10:16   #
f8photocine wrote:
Yes, this crop serves this photo well. I also like the photo nex to your name. Where was it taken?

Tim

Thanks Tim. The avatar was taken at Long Branch, NJ. If you want to see a larger version ot that image, search on "Long Branch Beach".
Go to
Feb 14, 2017 14:35:58   #
I like the 10x24 crop on this picture - what do you think?


(Download)
Go to
Feb 13, 2017 17:29:43   #
Great images - I love the processing. How are you achieving that effect (if its okay to ask)?
Go to
Feb 13, 2017 07:48:23   #
Aside from his lack of experience which will be a significant handicap, he needs at least N+1 redundancy for every piece of equipment he brings. That means camera bodies, flash units, SD cards, batteries, battery chargers, etc. Write up a list on equipment to bring, and check it off the night prior to the wedding. He should set the D7100 up to shoot in raw and the SD cards to mirror each other. Have him find out in advance if the church allows flash. If possible , arrange for a second shooter as insurance - he will absolutely miss some shots. Check autofocus throught the day. Maybe most importantly, set expectations with the bride and groom appropriately. There are so many things involved with successfully shooting a wedding, the equipment is the least of his worries. Although it may look easy, there really is no substitute for experience.
Go to
Feb 12, 2017 15:45:09   #
Rongnongno wrote:
I do not think you actually get it...

This is a piece of software that manipulates the image to be printed as 1200 DPI. The problem is that the 1200 DPI claim not possible. A 600 DPI printer will still be 600 DPI however hard you* try to claim achieving that 1200 DPI feat.

That the software manipulation leave artifacts is normal. Now, if you or anyone else is willing to live with that (see arrows) that is fine. As to the image you posted just look and compare and you will see problems in there too. Just more subtle. I find the Mosaic problem interesting. Looks like a magazine scanned image, not a inkjet/laser print scan. I compared all other sets by D/L then flipped to check them.

So forgive me for debunking this 1200 DPI lie** and pointing out the problems in processed images.

I did not address the other flat out misinformation about LR this time.

On the printer driver (ICC profile) can it be improved to get better results? I do not doubt that but then again, the 1200 DPI claim gets in the way.

Am I wrong to point out the issues w/o trying this? No.

Are you wrong to say you like it? Absolutely not. If you like the result, that is good for you. For me, looking at samples that are supposed to convince to purchase this? Sorry, they are driving me away as much as the false claim.

-----
* You as company, not you as an individual or user.
** I did not see any disclaimer stating that the printer still printed at 600DPI.
I do not think you actually get it... br br This ... (show quote)


Okay, so now that we've determined you won't believe your lying eyes, I have another (and final) suggestion for you. Check out Luminous Landscape's printing forum. Search on "Qimage overdrive", and look at the first couple of posts. The commentors on this forum are universally acknowledged to be some of the best and brightest when it comes to all things printers. However, since you already called Mike Chaney a liar, I suspect that won't make any difference to you. Its kind of like a high school football coach saying Bill Belichik doesn't know what he's doing.


(Download)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.