Your reply is some of the most useless verbal flatulence I have seen on this site. As for your statement, "good honest people" will become "bad folks" sorry but they will carry out their deed with or without guns. Have you forgot about 911, Timothy McVeigh, the Boston Marathon, etc.?
PNagy wrote:
Huey Driver: I don't know do you have any good liberal arguments…
Nagy: My "good liberal arguments" are my own. The proof is in legal arguments I have advanced that did not even appear in the dissenting opinions of District of Columbia v. Heller.
Nagy: "Good honest people" are not being held accountable for what "a few bad folks do." If they were, they would be imprisoned for murders they do not commit. You seem to have difficulty understanding or accepting that a certain percentage of those "good honest people" will become "bad folk" by gunning down a friend, relative, coworker, etc; that it is impossible to predict which of them will become "bad folk," therefore, to preserve the lives of their victims, nearly no civilian should have firearms.
Huey Driver: I think maybe we should ban all knives, cars, hammers, screwdrivers, etc. They seem to k**l people also.
Nagy:
1. knives, cars, hammers, screwdrivers, etc. have purposes without which far more damage would be done than their occasional malevolent misuse. For example, banning motor vehicles would cause the collapse of the infrastructure, resulting in millions of urban residents starving to death, a far greater carnage than the tens of thousands of accidental deaths and the very few murders caused by vehicles.
2. the primary purpose of firearms is to tear through flesh and bone.
3. per unit time in use, firearms cause far more carnage than motor vehicles. The average adult is in his car about an hour a day; that is hundreds of millions of people. The average person does not even own a gun. About a third of the population does, and the guns are kept under the bed or in a cabinet most of the time. For the relatively few moments they are in actual use, they k**l about the same number of people as traffic accidents. Unlike cars they serve not much good purpose.
After making arguments so unbelievably weak, you should consider not labeling what I write as any liberal talking points. You, not I, are the person who is not thinking about this at all, but regurgitating stupid points that somehow impress him. Try canning the NRA line about banning cars, etc. It is too easy to refute.
Huey Driver: I don't know do you have any good lib... (
show quote)