Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: alberio
Page: <<prev 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ... 403 next>>
Feb 4, 2024 12:48:24   #
Post processing:
I'm struggling with my post processing. I'm looking for others recommendations after you get a series of images/subs. What is your work flow, especially when using a DSLR or Mirrorless camera as opposed to a dedicated astro camera.
Gathering Data:
Is letting the camera reduce High ISO and long exposure noise for each useful, or should you take dedicated dark frames with a cover over the scope a better approach? Do you take a dark for each sub or just one at the end of the series?
I know these are out of order, but
Go to
Feb 4, 2024 10:16:21   #
Both of my generators are fully enclosed, so I couldn't get to the crankshaft nut without taking the panels off. Fortunately my larger one has electric start.
Go to
Feb 3, 2024 15:02:53   #
jederick wrote:
And it was nice to see she still has Grandpa looking out the window.

Was once again in this area so thought "what the hey" and snapped a few shots. Have made a similar post in the past but, just for grins!


Grandpa wasn't much for conversation, but he has that look.
Go to
Feb 3, 2024 14:58:31   #
dougsmithsatx wrote:
Almost every Spring, travelling south along US-281 on the northside of Marble Falls, Texas, on the right you'll notice an old abandoned stone farmhouse in a field full of the Texas state flower.


The last one is an Iconic Texas scene. What a great series.
Go to
Feb 2, 2024 12:29:52   #
WDCash wrote:
Hello

Im shopping for an EF 70-200 f4.
Have you sold yours?


Not yet. Keep in mind I don't have a lens foot with it and it doesn't have IS. I use it on my R6, so the camera has IBIS.
Go to
Feb 2, 2024 07:54:51   #
ChuckKarp wrote:
We used to see this truck on display back when I was going to old car shows with my 38 Chevy. It was on a huge car hauler in a parking lot. The new looking dually pickup truck pulling the rig had its hood up and had tools , gallons of fluids and God knows what all laying around the truck. We did our shopping and had lunch, it was still there when we left. Photo is from a cellphone in the rain.


What a coincidence, I heard one just yesterday. Cool truck.
Go to
Feb 2, 2024 01:38:27   #
btrlvngthruchem wrote:
I second your granddaughter's opinion about the colors especially the contrasty red.

The odd groupings of white dot artifacts are interesting. Each group is identical with regard to the number and location of the dots relative to each other. The groupings however, appear to be completely random in their locations in the image. Since you were able to get rid of the artifacts using noise reduction through the camera, this suggests that a good set of dark calibration frames will solve the problem as previously mentioned.

Just as an FYI and FWIW, I saw something in your image that I saw in an image I was working on the other day. I noticed most of the smaller stars in my image exhibited a tear-drop shape. I went back through the original individual light frames and examined them more carefully than I had done prior to the original stacking. I found the smaller stars in several of lights were quite elongated, whereas the larger stars looked perfectly acceptable. It seems the larger stars camouflaged a tracking error in those bad lights. Once I removed the bad lights, the stars were all nice and round.

I have to say I'm so jealous of your dark skies, or access to them. Light pollution on the west coast of Florida is getting worse by the week with all the building going on.
I second your granddaughter's opinion about the co... (show quote)


I believe you're right about the elongated stars. The mount I use is the Celestron Advanced VX, which is by no means a high end mount and it probably has some periodic error in the gears. It's still a pretty good mount within its limitations. I'll have to be more critical about the subs I select. I'm sure the use of dark frames and careful focusing will help the final image. Thanks for checking it out and for the input. I'm always willing to learn all the tricks.
Go to
Jan 31, 2024 16:44:21   #
Ballard wrote:
Neat shot. There are some unusual strings of dots that appear in the image. I'm not sure what can cause this type of noise, do you see them in the individual frames? I would try some making some dark frames and see if they show up there, if so the dark frames would help reduce them.
Neat shot. There are some unusual strings of dots ... (show quote)


Yeah, I think my aggressive processing is the cause. I'll try some dark frames and see if that helps. I went out last night and set the camera to high ISO noise reduction and long exposure noise reduction. It cleaned up the images to where I don't see those artifacts. Next time I'll try taking some actual dark frames. Thanks for the help.
Go to
Jan 31, 2024 08:34:47   #
tommystrat wrote:
Yeah, they'll pass you by... Do you hear the screams of super-powered engines, the squealing tires sliding around the curve, the smell of oil, gasoline, and burning rubber? The sights and sounds of the races are quiet for these old friends now. However, the memories of the days that were will always be there.


And they're for sale to boot.
Go to
Jan 31, 2024 08:31:09   #
terryMc wrote:
Going through the archives—I guess it's been over a decade since I've been to Utah.


I like everything about this photo. I'm also surprised there are no people to mess up the shot.
Go to
Jan 31, 2024 07:58:05   #
Railfan_Bill wrote:
Hey Alberio, could these noise be from the camera? You used the R6 on the other photo and got some strange noise patterns, too. These noise "streaks" are too coincidental to be random. Look at the pattern and the streaks fall into the same distance on the image. I hope I am making this clear. This may be caused by the camera sensor since it occurred on other posted photos, but not as prominent. just a thought. RFB


Thanks Bill for the input, I'll see if I get the same type of squiggles on separate shots. You could be on to something. I think Ballard asked if I took any dark or flats, and that might help to reduce or eliminate these also. I admit my work flow is a bit unconventional and possibly too aggressive, trying to get too much out of the limited data I had. Post processing, stacking, converting from RAW toTiff to Fits could also be part of the problem. Thanks again for the suggestion. I'll see if I can pin it down to one source.
Go to
Jan 30, 2024 15:52:24   #
pdsdville wrote:
Just a few fireworks over Grapevine Lake a few years ago. I've used two methods to shoot fireworks, one of which I like much better. Method one, open the shutter for 10 or 20 seconds and see what you get. Method two, wait until the initial burst of each blossom and then open the shutter for a much shorter time. One you get the blinding white burst in the center which in my opinion bleaches out some of the color. Two my much preferred method of waiting till after the burst and getting much richer colors. Don't know which you use but give the second one a try and see if you get better results.
Just a few fireworks over Grapevine Lake a few yea... (show quote)


I've tried both with good results both ways.
Go to
Jan 29, 2024 09:27:27   #
Longshadow wrote:
That's a possibility. I'm not up on bandwidth problems/symptoms.

But in this case I don't think it's any of your equipment.


Ok, I just logged into UHH on my laptop and was able to post the image. The laptop is connected to my wireless router, so something with my cellphone convoluted connection through the booster/wifi connection. I might just start using the laptop, as it is much faster. Thanks for your input Longshadow.
Go to
Jan 29, 2024 09:19:00   #
This is my interpretation or crazy processing of this object. I used a Askar 120mm f7APO @f5.6 with a total 29 subs of mixed exposure times 15-30 sec each. The ISO was also varied from 800-1600 with one at 12,000. The camera was a Canon R6. No darks or flats, just stacked and processed in a really old version of Nebulosity and final tweeks in Topaz. I know the colors are a bit weird, but my grandaughter likes them. There are also strange artifacts I probably introduced with my aggressive stretching/processing. I'm not sure how to eliminate them.


(Download)
Go to
Jan 29, 2024 08:55:57   #
Longshadow wrote:
Getting from point A to point B on the internet can go through many "places" on the route. Kinda like through repeaters.
Possibly one of those places on your route is having a problem. I've had that happen.
I could get to everything except one location. One time it was a problem with the lookup table at one of those "in-between" places. "Is It Down" said they could get to it, but they are in a different location than I am. It got fixed. It took a bit for them to figure out which table location it was though.
One does not have a "direct connection" to the destination URL.
Something in between is hiccuping.
Getting from point A to point B on the internet ca... (show quote)


Thanks for that info, I was suspicious of my T-Mobile booster via my wifi connection, but even when I just use the T-Mobile cell signal without the booster or wifi, it won't work. Maybe there isn't enough bandwidth at certain times.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ... 403 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.