Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: AlohaBob
Page: <<prev 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 next>>
Jan 13, 2015 00:27:46   #
CHOLLY wrote:
Bob, it IS a native ISO in that you can set your camera to 50 ISO... but you can not use ISO 50 for either the Auto ISO function OR the Multi-frame Noise Reduction function.

The normal (native) ISO range of the camera is 50-16,000. Auto (and MFNR) ISO range is 100-25600.

Let me suggest the following resource to you... that is, if you don't already have it:

http://friedmanarchives.com/alpha77/index.htm


This is THE best book available for your camera. It is EXCELLENT in every respect.

Friedman covers each and every feature of the A77 in great and complete detail, but writes in plain, easy to understand English.

He explains each function and tells you when, how, and why to use them.

Best of all, he gives you a 2 week money back guarantee. :D

This book is worth much more than what he is asking, and would be a steal at twice the price. :thumbup:
Bob, it IS a native ISO in that you can set your c... (show quote)



Hi Cholly, thanks for the book recommendation. I'm downloading now. Looks very good. I have Busch's book but have found it more frustrating than useful; to be fair the data is there, it's just hard to find and doesn't do a great job of evaluating what's useful and what's not.
Go to
Jan 12, 2015 18:31:33   #
Shellback wrote:
Have you viewed these articles:
http://breezesys.com/MultiCamera/index.htm
http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/Multiple_Cameras_using_CHDK


Thanks! This is GREAT! I have not seen these. Appears my google search terms weren't in the ball park.
Go to
Jan 12, 2015 18:28:00   #
Thanks for the answer. I think that article is what got me wondering about this and trying to find out if ISO 50 on the A77 was extended or not.
Go to
Jan 12, 2015 18:14:25   #
My A77 has ISO to 50. I have searched, but not been able to find out whether this is the native ISO or an extended ISO. Does anyone know? I use a fast lens and can usually use ISO 50, but have read that in some cases it's better to go with the Native ISO even if it's higher.
Go to
Jan 12, 2015 18:11:18   #
I need to be able to set up 8 - 12 cameras all pointed at a single subject from different positions, cause all cameras to fire by a single action, and automatically transfer the images to a (say) network drive. This would be a "station" and there could be 4 - 12 "stations" taking images all day long.

The lighting would be flat, controlled, and continuous. I'm thinking that, for the most part, the cameras would be set up in a relatively static way with focus and exposure pre-set; this would have to be changed ocasionally and shouldn't be too burdensome.

What we're trying to accomplish is speed up the image capturing workflow and improving the quality of the images. We would be capturing images for 2000 - 4000 or so unique objects per week with expectations that this would increase. There will be 8 - 12 high res images per object. The objects are used golf clubs (mostly), shoes, apparel, range finders, and various golf related accessories.

Currently, we're using high res webcams, hand holding the objects and a single person takes 8 - 12 images from different angles. This has been going on for about 9 years and we've all had enough :)

What I'd like to do is to be able to control this from a windows desktop. I've been looking for different ways to accomplish this, but it seems we're relatively unique.

I'm particularly interested if any of you knows about the API (application programming interface) or SDK (software development kit) capabilities of Canon or Nikon (I'm assuming that they're the only companies that have this). We're a programming shop working mostly in C#.

I would appreciate ANY suggestions about ANY aspect of accomplishing this. I've been scratching my head about it for weeks and have investigated and discarded the notion that we could do a good job of this with anything other than still cameras. Obviously, this could end up being a huge hardware investment, even with modest SLRs. Decent IQ from a middling Crop Sensor or compact would be fine and much better than what we're getting now.

The two main problems are 1) being able cause the cameras to fire without having to fire them individually and 2) Being able to get the images off the cameras automatically to a specific place on a computer hard drive fast. Lots of other features would be desirable, but these are key.

I've found CamRanger which might serve to control the cameras (focus and exposure) from a single PC, but it's an additional $300.00 per camera and it's building an ad hoc wireless connection that may or may not be fast enough.

I apologize for such a long post and appreciate your comments and help.
Go to
Jan 4, 2015 15:18:28   #
lighthouse wrote:
Noise hides in the shadows. Bringing detail out of the dark areas will bring out noise.
The is more colour and tonal information in the lighter tones as long as you keep the histogram under control.
Your original premise that - in digital details cannot be brought back successfully is totally wrong and the opposite is in fact true.
Google The Luminous Landscape Expose to the Right.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/expose-right.shtml


Thanks so much for this link. I've been very puzzled about exposure and IQ and this seems to have unlocked the door for understanding and handling.
Go to
Jan 4, 2015 03:41:19   #
jimbo70 wrote:
Does anyone know the difference between the Yongnuo 460 and 460II flashes? I know the 460II is a newer model and that they are manual flash units.


The 560 III has a built-in flash radio receiver and you can use it with Yongnuo's very inexpensive transmitter. It's a nice powerful and versatile flash. I have two; one stopped working and if that happens you might as well toss it because it costs more to send two ways to china for free repair than to buy a new one. I bought from Amazon; perhaps other vendors could provide US service.
Go to
Jan 4, 2015 03:34:16   #
aflundi wrote:
Are there any mirrorless cameras that provide exposure metering information while ISO is being set? Every mirrorless I have (P&S or ILC) will not meter during ISO adjustment, so if I want to set ISO last after aperture and shutter speed (which is what I usually prefer to do), I have to adjust blind, as sort of a sad throwback to film days.

Fortunately, my dSLRs don't have that problem, but I'll bet it's more because dSLR viewfinders are intrinsically so primitive compared to EVFs more than any forward-thinking on the part of the manufacturers. Whatever the reason, I'll take it in the dSLRs, but wish I could find a mirrorless that did it.
Are there any mirrorless cameras that provide expo... (show quote)


Sony A77 does this.
Go to
Jan 4, 2015 03:30:33   #
vinceinjax wrote:
Does anyone have experience with the Black Rapid camera strap system. It looks intriguing, but at 6'5" witha 54" chest, I'm wondering if the strap will fit me.


I'm a couple of inches shorter but similar chest. I have no data on Black Rapid, but really like my Peak Design Slide. It doesn't hang down to my waist at longest extension, but I really like where it does hang. I also like having the attachment to both an arca swiss tripod plate on the bottom and strap triangle on one side of the camera. I leave the tripod plate on all the time now and it's very quick and easy to disconnect the strap. I've had it a couple of months.
Go to
Dec 29, 2014 04:09:33   #
Ianpalmer wrote:
Hello and happy holiday to you all. I hope you all got what you wanted for Christmas and you are all out there having fun.

I have a question for all you UHH. I had a tripod that I purchased from Costco it's a Dolica proline, however the hook you use to add weight to stabilize the tripod fell off so I took it back. For the most part I liked the tripod but I am in need of a new tripod and I would like some assistance in finding a good replacement. I am willing to spend about $200, and I need one that is not too heavy to haul around. Your input would be highly appreciated. Thanks.
Hello and happy holiday to you all. I hope you al... (show quote)


I bought the same Tripod at Costco and returned it. Ended up with the MeFoto Road Trip which is about $200.00 and seems to be of better quality (particularly the ball head) than the Dolica. I like the MeFoto a lot. I really need a taller tripod (I'm tall) but couldn't afford right now and figured that the MeFoto would be good for travel and would be OK all around for the time being.
Go to
Dec 18, 2014 05:10:03   #
bcheary wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgeVx8QoVaQ
1996 Montreaux Jazz Festival
A young Dianna Krall. Russel Malone on guitar.


EXCELLENT! Thanks for posting that. I love Diana Krall, but have only heard her albums and never seen her.
Go to
Dec 16, 2014 03:49:23   #
Prettyflyer wrote:
I've been trying to learn how to operate my camera for about two years now. canon TSI - 18- 200 that is what I am working with. I always been fascinated with photography. I am looking for free lessons or a class in the Los, Angeles down, town area. I really want to pursue this hobby. My wallet is light as I have a autistic child. And therapy Is not cheap. Thank you for your time. .. PRETTYFLYER


This video set is excellent. 30+ hours of video. Not free, but currently half price ($99.00 during holiday sale)

https://www.creativelive.com/courses/fundamentals-digital-photography-2014-john-greengo
Go to
Dec 14, 2014 02:26:52   #
CHOLLY wrote:
Oh yes. :thumbup:

Unlike the A77,which could NOT be tethered. :(


Thanks!
Go to
Dec 14, 2014 01:48:14   #
CHOLLY wrote:
Bob, I know my A77 in and out and have used it under just about every photographic condition imaginable in the 3 years I've had it. All this is to say that I've EXTREMELY familiar with it's capabilities and operation.

The A77II is a MUCH better camera. It does focus faster... exponentially faster, and the focusing system is as good as any other on the market save the ones on the D4S and 1DX. Additionally, the flexibility is amazing. There are SO many things you can do with the AF system that you can't do with the A77.

Low light photography is also improved. The AF system is much more sensitive now using the pop-up lamp. (The only draw back is when photographing people you have to WARN them that the first flash is NOT the picture being taken! :lol: )

Additionally, there is LESS noise, and my favorite low light feature, Multiframe Noise Reduction, has also been improved.

I dislike the loss of the GPS module, and even though I personally don't use NFC I can see how it would come in handy, ESPECIALLY for remote control with a smartphone or tablet. The WiFi module can also be useful, though I don't use it either.

I also like the ability to customize the menu... a feature popular with NEX cameras. It's REALLY nice to be able to lay out the display EXACTLY the way you want it.

I'm still experimenting, and truth be told, you could spend a year learning the in's and out's of this camera before you master it.

I thought the A77 was powerful. Well, the A77II makes it look like a beginners camera!

I LOVE it!
Bob, I know my A77 in and out and have used it und... (show quote)


Cholly, thanks for taking the time to give so much data. Greatly appreciated. One quick question; can you tether the A77II?
Go to
Dec 14, 2014 00:11:11   #
DavidM wrote:
I've been shooting with a DSLR for a short period and still learning so I ask the question; as slyfoxdoc mentions, How do you shoot sports photography in manual mode when the exposure changes so fast? I have to use shutter priority to capture images I'm trying to get.

BTW, thanks for this post!!


I'm a total novice; never shot sports before and using the wrong equipment (A77 with 50MM 1.4). I tried a number of auto focusing options with bad results. Finally settled on manual focus and exposure and worked in a general area that was in fairly good focus. The (heavily cropped) results aren't very good. I'm going to practice before I try this again and hopefully get a longer lens.


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.