Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: alberio
Page: <<prev 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 403 next>>
Feb 7, 2024 08:21:18   #
robertkjr3d wrote:
I have recently shot the moon.
I have recently shot the Sun. But my Sun shots I was not as happy with.
I guess I expected to see Proms and all, and I didn't learn till later that you can't do that unless you have much more expensive equipment.

I have a Tamron 150-600mm with 1.4ex. So 840mm. Then I have a MrStarGuy Adjustable Solar Filter that I slip on the front of the lens hood. This is for ease to take off during the 'Solar Eclipse' in 2024.

I have read that I might be able to add something else to the setup to sharpen at least the surface? The above sun-shot is a stack of 30images. I'm not about to buy an expensive H-Alpha. I've spent enough already.

Note: The moon was simply a hand-held shot, it was sub-zero wind factor that night, and I wasn't about to grab my tripod. I had the camera on bracketing, but only one image actually came through super sharp. I was just testing, but that was still an amazing shot!

What's the goal? Of course I'm testing the setup to be better at shooting the solar items for April. And maybe what I've done is already enough.
I have recently shot the moon. br I have recently ... (show quote)


Remember that when the sun is in full totality, and you have removed the filter, you might be lucky enough to get a solar flare or two.


Go to
Feb 6, 2024 13:43:51   #
The day before the 2017 Great American Eclipse we were in Victor Idaho and the skies were so smoke filled, you couldn't see the sun very well, however the day of the eclipse was awesome and we had a huge crowd, which is another reason to attend. I still hope you go, so you can give us some cool photos.
Go to
Feb 6, 2024 13:36:49   #
AzPicLady wrote:
Oh, but I love that little upsweep of a cloud!


I agree. It gave me the impression someone was blowing the balloon to the right
Go to
Feb 6, 2024 13:31:45   #
StanMac wrote:
Good shot, but I would like to see a bit more detail on the balloon. Try selecting it and opening the shadow a bit.

Stan


The original was just a silhouette of the balloon, and this is my best effort to get the details. Thanks for the comment.
Go to
Feb 6, 2024 13:29:36   #
AzPicLady wrote:
You make it sound so simple. I don't know why for me it isn't.


Driving 1700 miles is never simple, or cheap. If I could afford to do the same, I'd drive to Texas and stay with my cousin in Austin.
Go to
Feb 6, 2024 08:13:19   #
Writing is one thing, but try printing.
Go to
Feb 6, 2024 08:04:40   #
stant52 wrote:
For your enjoyment ,from the archives ,was looking back at old folders . Here's some shots SOC from Rhinebeck ,New York Good Guys 2010


The Gassers and the truck are awesome.
Go to
Feb 6, 2024 08:00:21   #
Another fine set of a place I'll probably never see in person. Did the bank convert only to ATMs? Thanks for the tour.
Go to
Feb 6, 2024 07:49:39   #
AzPicLady wrote:
On doing the eclipse at "home." I had planned on going to my farm in Illinois, but recently discovered it's 15 miles outside the totality range. I could go to my niece's in Indiana, but that's even further to drive. And I just saw a map that claimed that only in south Texas would there be clear skies. I guess i could go to Waco, but I don't know a soul there and I wouldn't know where to set up. And it would mean doing the hotel/restaurant bit that would get really expensive.

I'm getting really discouraged.
On doing the eclipse at "home." I had pl... (show quote)

Go to your farm, then drive the 15 miles and find an open field, parking lot, roadside pullout, or anywhere you see other people setting up. The weather is definitely the biggest concern. Good luck, at least you get to go.
Go to
Feb 6, 2024 01:24:01   #
Many Thanks for the nice comments.
Go to
Feb 5, 2024 18:00:12   #
Ballard wrote:
Hi alberio

For my DSLR shots I would note the temperate at the time I took the light frames and take a series of Dark Frames at after the light frames. I also keep a library of previous dark frames and note the temperature that they were taken at and if the library contains a set that is within 5 degrees of the light frames usually just reuse those rather than take new ones. After a year or so I've heard it maybe prudent to retake dark frames as the sensor can change as it ages, (so far I haven't found that I need to do that). I similarly keep a library for flats based on the camera and optics, including filters used, and bias frames base on the camera used. (Note: I have had to occasionally take a separate set of flats if dust bunnies get in there and use that as an indicator that it is time to clean the filters, optics and or sensor.

Note: I organize the images by Deep sky vs Planetary and then have subdirectories for the image (e.g. M101).
I then typically have a subdirectory for the optical system used (e.g. DSLR_500mm, ZWO_meade16, etc).
This is then followed by the raw DSLR images (or an other subset of directories for different exposures lengths and or individual filter names used which contain either DSLR RAW frames or fits image taken with an astro camera). I also keep the stacked images and processed images at this level of the directory structure. Note:
Under there are directories for the good fames, calibrated frame, Debayered frames for the DSLR) and registered frames.

Below my cheat sheet I use for processing images using pixinsight so not all of it may be relevant to your process.
Below is my cheat sheet

Integrate Bias frames (Use process ImageIntegration)
Image integration
Combination: Average
Normalization: No normalization
Weights: Don’t Care (all weights=1)
Scale evaluation: Median absolute deviation from the median (MAD) THIS IS GONE IN NEW PIXINSIGHT.
Uncheck evaluation noise default others

Pixel Rejection 1
Rejection algorithm: Sigma Clipping
Normalization: No normalization

Pixel Rejection 2
Sigma low : 3.0
Sigma high : 3.0

Notes:
(** Warning: Inconsistent Instrument:Telescope:FocalLength (FOCALLEN keyword) value(s) - metadata not generated.
** Warning: Inconsistent Instrument:Telescope:Aperture (APTDIA keyword) value(s) - metadata not generated)

*** Error: Parsing OBJCTRA FITS keyword: Parsing sexagesimal expression: empty string
*** Error: Parsing OBJCTDEC FITS keyword: Parsing sexagesimal expression: empty string

These errors are not fatal, so you can still integrate the frames. However, metadata for geodetic observer coordinates will be lost in the integrated image (which is not really important for Bias frames).


Add RAW files - hit go button (circle on bottom of process box)
Stretch rejection_high and rejection_low to check for any big issuesStretch rejection_high and rejection_low to check for any big issues.

Save- integrated image as master_bias.xisf

Integrate Dark frames (same process and settings and as Bias frames)
Image integration
Combination: Average
Normalization: No normalization
Weights: Don’t Care (all weights=1)
Scale evaluation: Median absolute deviation from the median (MAD)THIS IS GONE IN NEW PIXINSIGHT.
Uncheck evaluation noise default others

Pixel Rejection 1
Rejection algorithm: Sigma Clipping
Normalization: No normalization

Pixel Rejection 2
Sigma low : 3.0
Sigma high : 3.0

Notes:
Add RAW files -hit go button (circle on bottom of process box)
Stretch rejection_high and rejection_low to check for any big issuesStretch rejection_high and rejection_low to check for any big issues.
Save- integrated image as master_dark.xisf


*** Error: Parsing OBJCTRA FITS keyword: Parsing sexagesimal expression: empty string
*** Error: Parsing OBJCTDEC FITS keyword: Parsing sexagesimal expression: empty string

These errors are not fatal, so you can still integrate the frames. However, metadata for geodetic observer coordinates will be lost in the integrated image (which is not really important for Dark frames).
Calibrate Flats (Use process ImageCalibration)
Output Files
Output Directory: example J:/deep sky/M31 2min 71F/Good/Calibrated/flats
Sample format: 32bit floating point
Master Bias (put check in box)
Set location of master bias
Don’t set calibrate as this is only used with overscan for special CCD’s.


Master Dark (do not check as there is no correlation to darks)
Master Flat (do not check as there is not a master flat to calibrate with)

Notes: Hit the go button (circle on bottom of process box). This fills the output directory with calibrated flats.

Integrate Calibrated flat frames (Use process Image Integration)

Image integration
Combination: Average
Normalization: Multiplicative
Weights: Don’t Care (all weights=1)
Scale evaluation: Median absolute deviation from the median (MAD)
Uncheck evaluation noise default others

Pixel Rejection 1
Rejection algorithm: Sigma Clipping
Normalization: Equalize fluxes

Pixel Rejection 2
Sigma low : 3.0
Sigma high : 3.0

Notes: We use Equalize fluxes in this case.
Add RAW files -hit go button (circle on bottom of process box)
Stretch rejection_high and rejection_low to check for any big issuesStretch rejection_high and rejection_low to check for any big issues.

Save- integrated image as master_flat.xisf
Find best Light frames (Use process SubframeSelector)
Add linear mode files DSLR RAW light frame files or mono .fits to Subframe Selector.
System Parameters
Subframe scale : (2.11 for 500mm lens, 1.106 with 2X teleconverter added, 0.396 for C11, 0.27 for lx200)
ZWO w 500mm -1.55arcsec/pixel
ZWO w 4096mm -.19arcsec/pixel
[Arcseconds Per Pixel] = (206.2648 x [Pixel Size in μm]) / [Focal Length in mm]
Note: FOV 247.65 x165.10 arcminutes for 500mm lens
123.83x82.55 arcminutes with teleconverter added
44.32x29.55 for C11
EOS 5d MarkIV pixel size 5.36 microns (num pixels 6720x4480)
EOS 5D Mark IV Camera resolution:14 bit
SBig 11002 Camera resolution:16 bit


Can use FWHM or weighting to decide on the best frames to use. (Also check on the number of stars to remove those that had clouds go by or high(bad) FWHM.
Typically default star detection parameters
Use the “measure subframes” routine to measure the frames. The click on those to remove in the graph.
Use the “output subframes” routine to copy the accepted frames to directory specified.
Rename best sub as the reference frame to be used later in image resitration.
Calibrate Light frames(Use process ImageCalibration)
Output Files
Output Directory: example J:/deep sky/M31 2min 71F/Good/Calibrated/lights
Sample format: 32bit floating point
Noise evaluation: Multiresolution Support

Uncheck CFA for monochromatic frames, leave set for color DSLR-RAW)
Master Bias (put check in box)
Set location of master bias
Don’t set calibrate as this is only used with overscan for special CCD’s.
Master Dark (put check in box)
Set location of master dark
Set Calibrate to calibrate lights with dark data
Optimization threshold: 0
Don’t set Optimize.
Master Flat (put check in box)
Set location of master flat (don’t check calibrate as the flat already has this in it).

Notes: This will subtract master bias from master dark then dark is subtracted from lights.
Hit the go button (circle on bottom of process box). This fills the output directory with calibrated light frames. Calibrate light frames from the accepted frames from subframe sector.


Debayer light frames(use process Debayer)
Don’t do for monochromatic Images
Bayer/mosaic pattern: RGGB
Demosaicing method : VNG
Evaluate noise is checked
Noise evaluation: Iterative K-Sigma Clipping
Output directory set location to put debayered frames
Added “calibrated files” from calibrated files. Debayer after calibration.
Hit the go button (circle on bottom of process box).


Register light frames (use process StarAlignment)
Reference image : Set reference image to best image found with subframe selector
Registration model: Projective Transformation
Working model : Register/Match Images
Check drizzle to generate drizzle data
Target image
Add all images that where accepted, calibrated and (and for color images debayered).
Output Directory (set to location to save registered images).
Default other settings

Hit the go button (circle on bottom of process box).


Integrate Registered light frames (Use process ImageIntegration)
Image integration
Combination: Average
Normalization: Additive with scaling
Weights: Noise evaluation (PSF signal)

Pixel Rejection 1
Rejection algorithm: Sigma Clipping (used Winsorized Sigma Clipping for >40 images)
Normalization: Scale +zero offset

Pixel Rejection 2
Sigma low : 3.0
Sigma high : 3.0 (lower this to remove satellites at the expense of added noise)

Add registered files and Drizzle files if drizzle was set in registration
-hit go button (circle on bottom of process box)
Stretch rejection high and rejection low to check for any big issues



For HDR use star alignment on the upstretched images. Then use the HDR composite process to combine the images taken with different exposure times.

Noise Reduction with Multiscale Linear Transform (Use Process MultiscaleLinearTransform before stretching

Use Dyadic with 4 layers
Scaling function Liner interpolation
Set layer 1 (3.000,0.33,3)
Set layer 2 (3.000,0.33,3)
Set layer 3 (3.000,0.26,3)
Set layer 4 (3.500,0.20,3)
Hi alberio br br For my DSLR shots I would note t... (show quote)


Wow, I'm going to print this for future reference if that's OK. Thanks for taking the time.
Go to
Feb 5, 2024 10:21:20   #
I was hoping to run inside grab my camera when the balloon was right next to a small rainbow, but this will have to do.


(Download)
Go to
Feb 5, 2024 08:25:33   #
hdfilmnoir wrote:
Taormina Italy


Nice, they sure like building on the steep hills. Makes for great views.
Go to
Feb 5, 2024 08:18:10   #
Ahhh, some bakers counter tops are similar to some mechanics work benches.
Go to
Feb 5, 2024 08:09:45   #
hobie 33 wrote:
This image seems appropriate for today's weather, cold, cloudy and windy.


Wow!!! Very nice, stay safe.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 403 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.