Posts for: Pilot 6
Nov 24, 2015 15:50:47 #
I'm using Mac X (10.6.8) and Safari browser and my head is swimming. My young (61) son is comming and may be able to shed some light on what everyone has so gererously responded.
thanks-
Bob
thanks-
Bob
Nov 24, 2015 01:05:17 #
In posting an image, I always check the box but rarely can the image be downloaded. I get an error message. See "Where's the telephone pole??" on the gallery today.
Bob
Bob
Nov 24, 2015 00:57:59 #
Mill race pond in Eugene. Comments of all kinds appreciated.
Nov 20, 2015 11:01:11 #
Nov 18, 2015 10:22:54 #
It's a very good photograph of a ghost with a halo.
Nov 1, 2015 16:42:57 #
Near downtown Eugene at high noon on a clowdy day.
Oct 27, 2015 11:29:15 #
AzPicLady wrote:
These are really lovely. Good job on the water. I don't know who decided water was supposed to look like whipped cream, but I think s/he should drown in it!
Many thanks!
Bob
Oct 27, 2015 11:27:38 #
tejaswrangler wrote:
Pilot 6, beautiful picture, you do good. Thanks for sharing. :thumbup: Tejaswrangler :)
Thanks, Tejaswrangler!
Oct 27, 2015 11:25:18 #
Oct 27, 2015 11:23:22 #
Bultaco wrote:
Great shot, I hate cotton falls.
Thanks, Bultaco.I hate'em too!
Oct 27, 2015 00:16:21 #
Tresed47, Bultaco,Tejaswrangler--
Many thanks to each of you for your gratifying comments. Here are a couple more from the same shoot.
Bob
Can anyone tell me what I did to get the exif data on the first shot? I'd really like to be able to get it at will. I was looking at Exif viewer sites but hadn't done anything (consciously) to download anything. Mystery.
Many thanks to each of you for your gratifying comments. Here are a couple more from the same shoot.
Bob
Can anyone tell me what I did to get the exif data on the first shot? I'd really like to be able to get it at will. I was looking at Exif viewer sites but hadn't done anything (consciously) to download anything. Mystery.
Oct 26, 2015 01:16:33 #
Meives wrote:
I like your composition. Your exposure is right on. I prefer the water stop motion like you have and not blurred. I don't know how you prevented the white areas to not be too bright. Often HDR is used for this, but hard to do with moving water.
Meives, I really appreciate your comments. I believe that many otherwise good photos have been ruined by portraying moving water as Redi-Whip. The white sections that get blown out get zapped.
Your comment had the Exif data of my picture on it. Can you tell me how you did that? I only shoot Jpegs and IPhoto is my only pp tool.
Thanks! Bob
Oct 25, 2015 10:47:34 #
This wonderful little park is off the McKinzie River in Springfield, Oregon. Comments are welcome.
Oct 17, 2015 13:11:57 #
It does not have the letter N (by it's self)on it. The $1050. 2.8-4.0 16-80 has the letters NC (atanding for Nano Coating) on it. If interested, please PM me. thanks. Bob
Oct 16, 2015 16:41:57 #
This great walk-around lens sells new for nearly 700 bucks, and is the poverty-stricken twin of the DX 16-80, 2.8-4.0, NC, VR, which goes for about 1050. The lens is like new and I have neither the box nor the manual. I'm asking $400.00 inxcluding shipping in the lower 48. Within 30 days of receipt
the buyer may return the lens in same condition whereupon I will refund the entire $400.00. Accept Bank Money Order or Walmart money transfer with shipping within 12 hrs, or personal check with shipping upon check clearance.
Hood is included---forgot to photo it (senior moment)
the buyer may return the lens in same condition whereupon I will refund the entire $400.00. Accept Bank Money Order or Walmart money transfer with shipping within 12 hrs, or personal check with shipping upon check clearance.
Hood is included---forgot to photo it (senior moment)
