So what's the deal? They pay you so much for every time you repetitively insert this info? You're working for a Guinness world record of your own? You own a stake in the company?

Oh, so you are pro-s***ery, one human owning, controlling, possessing another human. I thought pro-s***ery went out decades ago. So much for your "logic".

You support the homicide of the unborn. Be man enough to own your position.

If you paid attention to anything more than how to respond you'd probably know I've said there are instances where it has to be at least able to be considered in the situation. And at that point we'll probably know I am stronger than the now dead guy who did it.

And rather than murder I should have labeled it correctly, homicide. You vehemently support homicide, the taking of one human life by another.

I don't dislike anything about women. Unless they think like you. My two daughters are quite accomplished, starting with each getting a degree in communication disorders and speech pathology and both doing it in 3 1/2 years. I fully support a woman's right to do anything she chooses to herself, no matter how stupid. I just don't support her unilaterally being able to murder another human for wh**ever convenience it affords her.

I answered the only part even remotely not too stupid to answer.

Keep digging. They create a human. You're probably expert on hearing stupid things, since you are always present.

Let's see. A live sperm joins with a live egg creating a human being. So oh, it is life at conception and you are one of the best hole diggers anywhere because every word you speak digs a deeper and deeper hole at an amazingly rapid rate.

As previously stated, it is your privilege to be wrong.

But it is not her body. It is carried within her body but it isn't hers. So you'll just have to settle for being wrong. Scientifically proven.

mjmoore17

Yes or no, have you ever heard of DNA?

Yes or no, do you know what DNA is?

Yes or no, do you know how DNA identifies unique individuals?

And there it is. Totally as expected. So this "she" you are speaking of, should "she" have the sole v**e regarding you, or regarding (insert any celebrity name here) or regarding (insert any sports figure name here) or regarding (insert any politician name here) or anyone else? Because DNA. You've heard of it? You have some minimal comprehension of it? Now I agree fully 100% that "she" should have the sole v**e regarding herself, her own body, you know, the oh so inconvenient part that is 100% her DNA. She should not have the "sole v**e" regarding anyone else. You are wrong and you know you are wrong so you won't answer the questions because doing so honestly would be admitting you are wrong.

And conversely, a woman shouldn't make the ultimate decision regarding someone else's life.

So one more attempt at the simple questions that again won't be answered.

Questions so easy even a Geico caveman can answer them.

Yes or no, have you ever heard of DNA?

Yes or no, do you know what DNA is?

Yes or no, do you know how DNA identifies unique individuals?

Take your time. They're a little challenging. But not too tough for the cavemen anyway.

No point. The left has perfected b****t c***ting enough to make it no contest.

Questions so easy even a Geico caveman can answer them.

Yes or no, have you ever heard of DNA?

Yes or no, do you know what DNA is?

Yes or no, do you know how DNA identifies unique individuals?

Take your time. They're a little challenging. But not too tough for the cavemen anyway.