I lived in the Midlands, Leicestershire, and move around quite a bit and found pockets more tolerable but on balance I didn't find anything that would compare to much of the U. S. and I've lived in six different states from Florida to Colorado and traveled all up in the northeast and to California. Not saying that's adequate to make a call for everywhere but I think three years in the UK was plenty for there. I made many trips in all directions from Leicestershire to get a pretty good sense of what was going on most of the time. The UK is roughly the size of Arkansas and Louisiana combined so covering it isn't a big deal.
I lived in the Midlands, Leicestershire, and move ... (show quote)
Which avoids the question of whether you explored the more remote regions of the UK. Blanket judgments about "sulphorous" air don't really amount to much objectively. Driving around, if that's what you mean, is not the same. I've lived in several states including New Jersey, Mass., Colorado and California and now Utah, as well as Spain and I don't feel I know any of them all that well.
This is interesting but could you supply some examples. Something to take into account is the difference in light between the UK and the USA. I am not disagreeing with you but would like to see examples (I am from the UK but now live in the Western USA where the light is so different).
A possible alternative is a mac mini and then buy 3rd party RAM and a 3rd party monitor. You can also buy external storage quite cheaply although you do need a decent amount onboard the mini to start. I haven't priced this out but I did 5 or 6 years ago (as compared to an iMac) and am very happy with the mini + a Dell monitor, although it is getting time to upgrade again.
Interesting. I am a fan of Lee Filters (and Joe Cornish) but maybe things have moved on or I am just unaware of the competitors. This looks like a decent review ...
For portraits I would suggest looking for a used 135 f/2. Have a look at the Flickr site -- Google "Canon 135mm f/2 Flickr". Can't go wrong. Also, I have a Zeiss planar 50 but it is manual so focussing is tricky. I mainly use it for static situations but on the 5D iv it is great.
As others have said, you can replicate the look with your zooms. But you cannot replicate the feel of the primes so easily.
Thanks, Regis. That's a good suggestion although I do like having a prime. The ability to focus down to 3 feet is a plus compared to the primes. I have a FF DSLR (5D iv) but the mirrorless + 2x extender idea is interesting. Thank you!
I am quite happy with the Kenko (~$70 on ebay) but that's with the old Canon 400mm f/5.6 and so you do need good light because you lose a stop with the x1.4. I got it mainly to see how TCs fared in general and will probably upgrade to the Canon eventually -- and certainly if I upgrade the lens.
I would say with the 400 mm f/4 you could easily go to 560mm with a 1.4 TC and maybe 2x would work well too. I can't use a 2x because my 400mm prime is f5.6. I decided to get used Kenko TCs before buying the much costlier Canon TC but so far so good with the Kenko.