It appears to be a "B"-----------Henry
Am looking for a negative to digital converter which will accept 120 film 2.25 sq & hopefully the 2.25 x 2.25+++ 126 ?. Any information will be greatly appreciated. Henry the Elder
How about " I cant hear you speak louder " several times in succession--works well----Henry
Get an AC current probe & measure the current to the motor. Current requirements are listed on the motor's ID plate. If current is within spec (about 6 to 7 amps per HP) the pump is at fault. If the current is below spec of near zero you have a wiring problem---Let me know---Henry
I agree on the comments about being a terrible car to drive. As with most GM vehicles brakes were a joke ( Ilived in a mountainous area where brakes were important. My 1955 Studebaker was superior in most respects especiually handling & BRAKES_____Henry
The 210 was the mid level trim in 1955, the stripper was a 150 & Bel air was the top line. The Biscayne came along in 1958.----Gear Head---Henry
I will vote for the Kodak Chevron----had one for many years---remember it well----Henry
Thanks---I will check it out----Henry
I Am not new to photography. I Still have my prized Zeiss Ikoflex. I am a building inspector & in this mode I take many photos; am many as 100/ day. The environment is challenging to a camera---insulation, dust mud, crawl spaces, attics & rain etc. In the old days (Film) the Olympus was my choice as a "Tool Box" camera. I would like to hear some comments on rough duty experiences. I have had fairly good luck with Fuji, not so good with Nikon. A DSLR is certainly over kill for this application. Quanity & reliability take presidence over quality (Finess & Grace) . My most important requirements are long range zoom & reliability. An optical viewer is much desired over an LCD screen---bright sunlight viewing. Thanks----Henry