Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: lbjed
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 19 next>>
Dec 26, 2020 10:57:23   #
Blaster34 wrote:
Cool, looks a couple vying for the hoofs of a young lady friend....good catch.


Go to
Dec 26, 2020 10:56:32   #
rmalarz wrote:
Very good catch, Blaster.
--Bob


Go to
Dec 26, 2020 10:43:14   #
Blaster34 wrote:
I know, I know its a bird feeder, but wife wanted it but as we were sitting down for Christmas Dinner yesterday, Painted Bunting showed up on the feeder, had to try and get a photo. I've seen these in a few places in Florida but never in my backyard. Would love to get one in the bushes but they are so skittish, I'm happy to get a photo anywhere...much better in download.

I'm presuming the first photo is of female buntings, not sure but the last two are definitely a male bunting in his best Christmas colors...Cheers everyone, be safe and Happy New Year.
I know, I know its a bird feeder, but wife wanted ... (show quote)


That is one small colorful bird. Great capture. A nice surprise on Christmas Day. Attached is my Christmas morning surprise. Looked out the patio door and what to my wondering eyes should appear... I think it was Dasher and Dancer.


(Download)
Go to
Dec 20, 2020 07:59:24   #
Roadrunner wrote:
Like it, it shows the times these times. lbjed


Go to
Dec 20, 2020 07:56:20   #
Nice and sharp, great captures
Go to
Dec 20, 2020 07:52:54   #
Look at me, I'm walking on water.


(Download)
Go to
Dec 20, 2020 06:32:56   #
10 for 10 and still have a VCR and cleaner tape and a rotary wall phone working in my garage in avocado green. :)

How many took the tubes from the TV set to be tested and/or replaced. I went to the local drugstore.

We are quite a mature group. LOL
Go to
Dec 19, 2020 10:44:41   #
camerapapi wrote:
I never zoom an image beyond 50% to determine if it is sharp. A 50% crop is the equivalent for a pretty big enlargement.
At 100% crop if they look sharp they are sharp enough.


But the question remains - is sharp enough good enough. I am my own worst critic when it comes to my photos.
Thanks for your response.
Go to
Dec 19, 2020 10:41:44   #
home brewer wrote:
sharp is when the detail is clear and well defined. I think that this photo of my grandson is sharp. The focus point was his face near his nose; just a little below his eye. At 100% the tiny hairs on his face are sharp. D850 iso 64, f10, 1/180s with flash. The second photo is about 100% showing all the wear on his face from a day of play. I think this would print well at 8x10 which would almost be life size


Thank you for your response. With flash I can almost always count on photos being sharp unless I do something drastically wrong.
Go to
Dec 19, 2020 10:39:24   #
Longshadow wrote:
No matter what camera you use, it can always be sharper.


That is probably a definite.
Go to
Dec 19, 2020 10:38:34   #
Jimmy T wrote:
For me, 100% is quite enough, and I'm kinda OCD.
But, aren't most photographers?
Costco has printed out my "sharp enough at 100% files" to 20 X 30" and they looked great to me.
Also, folks that received them seemed well pleased.
This is just my opinion, I'm sure that many more will follow.
Enjoy your hobby.
Have a Merry Christmas
And a Safe and Healthy New Year!
Smile,
JimmyT Sends
For me, 100% is quite enough, and I'm kinda OCD. b... (show quote)


Thank you Jimmy. A very Merry Christmas to you.
Go to
Dec 19, 2020 10:35:21   #
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
It's good to check your equipment- cameras and lenses to make certain they are performing well and in good repair. If you make lots of large prints or display your images on large screens, this is especially important.

Most modern lenses are sharp, some more than others and of course, camera formats and pixel counts factor in.

When testing or evaluating a camera or lens, you can examine the images at 300% magnification. If the results are disappointing, make sure your equipment is properly aligned and you did not mess up in shooting with inaccurate focusing, camera movement, insufficient shutter speed, etc. Conduct test using a tripod and careful exposure and focus management. if you suspect a problem you either need to send your gear in for repair or if it is irreparable or really inferior equipment, you should consider replacing it.

At the end of the day, consider this. How many large prints or photomurals are you producing? Are you satisfied withte the results you are getting with the prints and display methods you are using? You make a print, it is sharp to your eyes, you mount and frame it and display it proudly- how many folks are gonna view it at 300% magnification?

If you don't frame and compose your images "properly" and you need to radically crop every shot- you are gonna be disappointed regardless of the quality and performance of your gear. If you shoot everything at ISO 6500- again, how is your gear gonna help you?

In my own case, as a commercial shooter, many of my images end up on billboards, transit advertising on the sides of buses and trucks, and dispatched in the Jumbotron at our local NHL venue. Not all of my lenses are camera are the latest and greatest, although I do shoot someof my stuff on medium format digital the results are sharp even from my 8-year old Canon gear.

So, shoot carefully, test precisely and if you are still dissatisfied, it's time for a fix or a replacement.

OCD? I ain't a psychologist and many folks bandy about "diagnoses" of mental and neurological disorders. I prefer to say "fussy, precise, or attentive to detail" rather than OCD. The problem is, however, that so many well-meaning photographers are so busy look for trouble- optical aberrations, difraction, noise, and a log list of malfunction and defects, that they don't have energy, creativity, and artistry left in the approach that the miss out on good images, spontaneity and fun. It's likely that 80% of the defects and glitches they are looking for will not even be detectable in 16x20 prints and the "faults" may even add to the mood!
It's good to check your equipment- cameras and len... (show quote)


Thanks for the great advice.
Go to
Dec 19, 2020 10:34:52   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Review all your images at the 1:1 pixel level to determine the image sharpness, before any processing. Cull any image image that isn't sharp before processing, they won't get better later. Only use your valuable and limited time to process the keepers.

Consider these ideas too, including examples of reviewing the 1:1 details (aka 100% zoom):

How to obtain sharp images in digital photography


Thanks for the great advice.
Go to
Dec 19, 2020 10:33:48   #
NCMtnMan wrote:
How sharp is your vision? At 69, I often have to adjust my glasses slightly to make sure which one it is.


At 67 not to good. Progressive lenses. A pain when i'm out shooting.
Go to
Dec 18, 2020 07:08:12   #
How does one determine if a photo is sharp enough?

I generally view them at 100% and again at 300%. If a photo looks sharp at 100% is that a sharp photo?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 19 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.