As dark and grainy as the video is, i don't see where you can say she is trying not to cry. You are simply chimping back what the website headline does. If you watched the actual full conference, you would have seen the president actually also asked her the question and her response was affirming that UV and disinfecting do k**l the v***s but it has not been used as a treatment.

The clip does not include the previous statement from the president which sets up the clip - you can tell because the first word you hear is "so..." . Please do some critical thinking on your own. do the research rather than just parroting back information from an extremely liberal website.

You think your dog could avoid getting impeached for peeing on the carpet or sniffing the crotches of heads-of-state ??? Not to mention humping their legs ...

Do you not find it silly that you are supplying a 'news' website link to tell people what the president said ?

Really ????

Thanks for illustrating my point of how maybe its not the president that is not-too-bright ...

I challenge you for the next week to ignore all media when it come to President Trump's statements and actually listen to his conferences realtime with no pre-bias . Treat it as he is talking to you in a conversation face to face and when he makes a comment to illustrate his statement and say 'like ...' look at it as an illustration to help you understand what he is saying. I bet if you look at the media presentation AFTER you did that your response would be 'thats not what he said !'. If you allow the media to tell you what you 'really' heard then you will never ever be able to think on your own.

Try it - I dare you. What do you have to lose but your prejudice ????? I don't think the president is as dumb as you seem to hold him. We must look from our own understanding though and not blindly quote what people with an agenda (the media) tell you.

Even my comments should be evaluated on facts you can check for yourself. Not doing that proves that WE are by far dumber than you think the president is !!!!!!!!!

yes and no - yes intensity will vary the effect but the point of UV is to disrupt the DNA's replication and functionality. Its what destroys the v***s. If the v***s is in a cell (which is how it replicates) destruction to the RNA of the v***s is likely to cause healthy cell DNA distruction as well. So yes the patient could be 'cured' but can can't get oxygen because their lung cells die without being able to replicate normally. So the good news is the patient has no C***D but they are also dead.

Again - if somebody would site the source of the original comment, we could see if what was actually claimed is being done in NY ... I can show you the site of the ongoing UV studies out of Mt Sinai which are not new ...

please site your source for this information.
The destruction of DNA processing will occur in healthy cells as well as v***s particles so probably not a factual source you are looking at

After further research, Mt Sinai has an on-going project to look at using UV light in a room to decrease the viable v***s particles in that room - not to expose internal lung tissue to UV. Please let me know if you have source for your information so I can be informed correctly if I am not finding full documentation - thanks

Last response for me - The physicians (practitioners and epidemiologists connected to my employer) are questioning how the deaths could have occurred since the drug is widely used when malaria is suspected.
There is documented cases where the drugs DID reverse the impact of the C***D v***s ansd facilitated recovery in patients. (I am trying to get the abstracts on those patients now) Unless the person took well over the normal dosage, they would not have expected to see any problems if the persons didn't already have other conditions which are contradindicated for use.

I question if a person took any non-prescribed drug, that they also did other things that could have k**led them. So it may not really the drug ingestion on its own that caused death. Overdose maybe or allergy to the drug, maybe ...

from the FDA who support what the president said and in fact cleared the drug for use in C***D patients says this:

From FDA site speaking of potential issues of the drug -

One example of that is heart rhythm problems, which the FDA warned today had been associated with chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine. Known side-effects of the drugs could lead to “serious and potentially life-threatening heart rhythm problems,” the agency said in a statement.

“Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine are FDA-approved to treat or prevent malaria,” the agency said. “Hydroxychloroquine sulfate is also FDA-approved to treat lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. These medicines have not been proven safe or effective for treating C****-**.”

Most recently, reports of heart-related illness and even death among those treated with the two medications in C****-** cases have been recorded in the official FDA A*****e E***t Reporting System database, among other places. In some incidents, the drugs have been taken on their own; in others, they were combined with other medications, like the antibiotic azithromycin.

“These a*****e e***ts included a******l heart rhythms such as QT interval prolongation, dangerously rapid heart rate called ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, and in some cases, death,” the FDA cautions. “Patients who also have other health issues such as heart and kidney disease are likely to be at increased risk of these heart problems when receiving these medicines.”

easily blocked by anyone who wishes to not see the posts from them

I understand your point of view and can't really disagree. But the one thing WE can do - on both sides - is when we hear something like the 'president said to inject bleach' is to look at the actual content instead of using what we hear in media. We need to look at the actual footage *in context* before using it to support our own jaded opinion.

Unfortunately, we do have a lot of folks who take what they hear in media as facts because that is the way media presents it. And I am sure that somebody will be k**led by injecting themselves with some sort of external disinfectant.

it was used as an analogy - NOT suggested or asking if it was viable to use bleach. Key word in the communication - "LIKE..."

The v***s is quite real - no 'h**x' . It is very communicable - that is also quite real. If people were not ego-centric, and would look at impacts of their action on others, we would not have to have a nanny-state tell people to stay home when they are sick. Additionally - the most unusual part of this v***s is that it has a potentially long incubation state where the v***s can be t***smitted even when no symptoms are apparent.

So to keep at-risk patients safe from the folks who don't care who are harmed, the oppressive governmental restrictions have a purpose. Not saying that every restriction is correct but that the government is functioning as it should to protect those who can be harmed through the carelessness of others. Personally I think it would be better if people just used common sense but there seems to be a shortage of that theses days.

I also wish that people would stop calling names just because they disagree. Not just on the part of politico's but everyone here on this forum (including me) has resorted to calling opposing views stupid or calling the person sharing them worse names rather than presenting factual evidence on why the commentor is not correct. Also what I see here with grouping people together and applying a derogotive name to them really shows the commentor's own shortcomings in being unable to understand and correct another's errant view .

I think the problem is most people confuse statistics with 'science'. The statistics will change depending on what question you are answering. For example deaths with patients who test positive to C***D vs deaths CAUSED by C***D. Two completely different results.

Right now the media is pushing the numbers for deaths where C***D was detected to inflate the urgency and sell more media ...

I am aware of this from Allegheny County death reports - in one instance the person was in an auto accident but it is reported as C***D related even though the person died at the scene.

CMS (Medicare) guidelines also has stated that if a positive test for C***D is identified, it MUST be included in the list of diagnosis that the patient was admitted for and should be used as the cause of death if in doubt. Check the CMS website for more detail

I usually like the B&W but it could use more contrast or lower black level. Little more PP and I would say hands down number 1

That was my conclusion - looks like fingers to me

Your Wasabi batteries swelled ? Also, why didn't you buy the Wasabi's that DID match or exceed the mAh rating ? Not challenging you on it - just curious. Have you talked to Wasabi and replaced them or got money back ?