Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Posts for: JohnFrim
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 926 next>>
Mar 2, 2024 21:42:19   #
robertjerl wrote:
To ensure the people were armed and could resist the government if it became a tyranny.
To further that goal all abled bodied men were part of the unorganized m*****a. States, counties, cities, towns and other groups formed organized m*****a units. And those included, infantry, cavalry and artillery units. Even naval m*****a along the seacoasts and on the Great Lakes. Each m*****a designed their own uniforms. Those m*****as either supplied their own weapons or the local government or some rich m*****a members bought them. Yes, even the artillery guns were privately owned.

That is in part why the Civil War got off to such a fast start with all the various m*****as* joining either the Union or Confederate Armies as volunteer troops. The Union army also had units of "Regulars". All those uniforms caused a lot of "friendly fire" incidents in the early battles. Later in the case of the union forces the Regulars wore all dark blue, volunteers wore dark blue over light blue and some special units wore green. Though some units held on to their own uniforms as long as they could.

*Though many of them were little more than social clubs who only practiced marching and drilling. As combat troops, they were mostly a confused, armed mob. Western troops of the Union and many Confederate troops were good individual fighters due to hunting etc. but not much good in coordinated fighting until they learned the hard way. Then add in that the officers only knew the Napolianic and earlier style of formation fighting and mostly kept it up until the end was largely responsible for the awful casualty rates. 2% of the total population of both sides died = 620,000 of just over 31million population on both sides, including s***es.
To ensure the people were armed and could resist t... (show quote)


Do you think a second Civil War may be on the horizon?
Go to
Mar 2, 2024 21:22:13   #
Racmanaz wrote:
Who would you prefer?


Trump, of course! Extradite him to Canada and we will put him away where he belongs in a jiffy!

But seriously, I don’t follow Canadian politics much because it is boring. All I know is “anyone but Poilievre” is analogous to “anyone but Trump.”
Go to
Mar 2, 2024 21:17:59   #
Texcaster wrote:
The world is rethinking it's future with Trump in the equation. Watch the vid for context.

Australia’s former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull says that former US President Donald Trump was like a 12-year-old boy in awe of his hero whenever he met Russia’s Vladamir Putin.
www.abc.net.au%2Fnews%2F2024-02-27%2Fmalcolm-turnbull-on-donald-trump-and-vladimir-putin%2F103505294" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/abcnews/status/1762079081502511577?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1762079081502511577%7Ctwgr%5E7c903322460b9023e6a81d89cf4d9e985dc75ec4%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.abc.net.au%2Fnews%2F2024-02-27%2Fmalcolm-turnbull-on-donald-trump-and-vladimir-putin%2F103505294

Speaking on Australian broadcaster ABC’s Q+A, Mr Turnbull said that Mr Trump’s possible return to the White House posed a “terrifying” threat to democracy, because of his embrace of autocratic leaders.

"He is attracted to dictators and tyrants like [North Korean leader] Kim Jong Un and [Chinese President] Xi Jinping and he threatened to undermine or pull out of America’s longest standing alliances,” Mr Turnbull said, referring to Mr Trump’s recent threat to pull out of NATO.

The former prime minister, who was in office when Donald Trump first took office in 2017, said he had not bowed to Mr Trump’s pressures to “suck up” to him, as other leaders had.

During their overlap as leaders of their respective countries, Mr Turnbull said he had seen Mr Trump with Russia’s President a few times.

"When you see Trump with Putin, as I have on a few occasions, he’s like the 12-year-old boy who goes to high school and meets the captain of the football team. My hero!” Mr Turnbull said, calling the reverence shown “creepy”.

"What if Donald Trump forces Ukraine to surrender to Putin? What if Donald Trump pulls out of NATO? Donald Trump has threatened to pull out of NATO,” Mr Turnbull continued.

"Donald Trump stood up in front of an audience and he said to an unnamed European leader, if you don’t spend more money on defence I’m going to encourage Putin to have a go at you. That’s more or less what he said.”

Mr Turnbull said Australia would have to get used to the idea that the United States was no longer aligned in its values as it was a few decades ago.

“The scary thing is that for countries like Australia and many European countries, we may find ourselves not dealing just with two autocracies in Russia and China, but what is Trump’s America going to look like?” Mr Turnbull said. “This is a guy leading a party that is no longer committed to democracy as we understand it.”
The world is rethinking it's future with Trump in ... (show quote)


Yet another excellently stated perspective from someone who is in a position to know firsthand the perilous situation the world is in. Alas, it will not sway the MAGA cult members.
Go to
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Mar 2, 2024 21:11:49   #
Racmanaz wrote:
You should be concerned about your e******n as well. Go Pierre Poilievre!!!


Oh, PULLEEEEEZZZ…. NO!! It may be time for Trudeau to pass the gavel, but not that way!
Go to
Mar 2, 2024 21:05:44   #
I sure hope your p**********l e******n does not come down to Trump vs Kennedy. If it does, and if I had a v**e, I would write in Howdy Doody, or Mickey Mouse, or Elmer Fudd… any of which would be a better choice.
Go to
Mar 2, 2024 20:48:33   #
I prefer the level of transparency of the blouse in the AI rendering.
Go to
Mar 2, 2024 16:31:18   #
Colorization issues or not, I like the photo(s).
Go to
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.
Feb 27, 2024 01:54:49   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
In my opinion they are all sold out, the graft of the Biden family is probably somewhat common in DC and that is why so many there remain quiet on the issue. Don't for a moment think that the Democrats have any more integrity than the Republicans, both parties play in the swamp and both enrich themselves through the power of their government positions.

That is the problem with our government and that is exactly the reason that Trump came to power and continues to exercise such influence on the Republican Party because the base is tired of a government that is not responsive to their needs and the futures of their children.
In my opinion they are all sold out, the graft of ... (show quote)


I agree as to why Trump came to power. He was not experienced in government, and that was seen as an asset, given the displeasure with virtually all government people. Why not try to run the government like a business? That seemed like a nice logical and refreshing change.

But what Trump promised and what he delivered are not the same thing.

Trump may claim to be a successful businessman, but his methods of operating his businesses are underhanded and unscrupulous; and he tried to run the country in a similar way. Many Republicans, including virtually all who served is his Cabinets, have recognized he should not be POTUS a second time and have declared him a danger to democracy. But very few -- especially those in Congress -- will openly admit their true feelings about Trump.

I completely understand your position as a Republican on not liking Biden. But you will be v****g for Trump only because of your displeasure with Biden and/or Democrats. The sad thing is that the MAGAs are ensuring that there are no alternatives on the Republican side. That leaves sensible Republicans with no choice but to take the lesser of the evils... and for these Republicans that is Trump.

I -- and the majority of v**ers (at least in 2020) -- feel just the opposite. I really wish there were a better choice for Democrats because I think Biden is past his prime, but I would take Biden over Trump in the blink of an eye. Trump is the lowest of humanity, and whether you believe it or not HE IS destroying America. He has divided the country irreparably; he has normalized lying, name-calling and r****m; he has turned your entire judicial system into a clown show where SCOTUS is afraid of making the right decision(s) for fear of a civil war. And on the world stage the US lost the respect of Allies because of his petulance and arrogance.

I do... and I don't... look forward to November.
Go to
Feb 26, 2024 18:07:54   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
Have a question for ya John.... Do you think that some of the most senior political operatives in DC are more concerned with the wishes of the monied donor class or their constituents back home.


I have no doubt about that.

But tell me, do you not agree that many Republicans are afraid of losing their seats if they don't support Trump? How about the likes of Lindsay Graham who said he had enough of Trump right after 6 Jan, and is now kissing the ring (or lower)? And he is not alone in this situation; McConnell is another who was finished with Trump and then turned tail. What about the many p**********l challengers on the right who badmouthed Trump and are now supporting him?

It is my considered opinion that all politicians suffer from some degree of fear of losing their positions. But I also see much more hypocrisy on the Right than on the Left in that regard. There are many who privately admit that Trump is a terrible person to lead the country, but in public they keep those sentiments to themselves. The sad thing is they don't have the balls to support someone else -- anyone else -- who would be a better POTUS than Trump while still pushing/supporting Conservative values.

I don't care if POTUS is a Democrat or a Republican; I DO CARE if it turns out to be Trump.
Go to
Feb 26, 2024 10:02:07   #
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
How about the investigations are a "h**x"?

Four indictments to date, with 91 counts are a far cry from a h**x.

But there are still additional investigations going on for Wire Fraud which haven't reached the indictment stage yet, so the number of indictments, and the number of charges could end up being higher.

Or how about trump's claim of absolute immunity?

Only a totally corrupt conservative Supreme Court would let that absolute immunity claim stand!


“Absolute immunity” vs “No one is above the law” can only be interpreted as “God” vs “man.”
Go to
Feb 25, 2024 23:11:12   #
dennis2146 wrote:
How like you on the lying corrupt Left to think you speak for me and millions of other Americans who want and value the Conservative thinking of our Founding Fathers and the Constitution.

Dennis


I always chuckle to myself when you use this kind of argument without seeing the t***h behind it.

In t***h, MORE millions of Americans DON'T think the way you do.

Thus, any "speaking on behalf of millions of Americans" who think differently from you is simply reflecting a majority sentiment... and that is democracy at work.
Go to
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Feb 25, 2024 22:27:28   #
Jim, a lot of your followers/commenters have noted that "you" are getting better. But you have confessed that you are using AI in the processing of these images.

Given that many of your photos have similar characteristics (nude female, beach or rocks/river settings) do you think the "software is learning" over time, or are you making subtle adjustments as you go?
Go to
Feb 25, 2024 22:13:08   #
Toby wrote:
I agree. That's why I think some of us are getting too hung up on this. Thats why I suggested a different name for alerted photos so they can unwad their panties. Of course AI is different.


In response to the quoted post and your earlier comment, what does "straight out of the camera" mean for a digital image? Both the JPEG and the RAW files are computer manipulations of light levels falling on pixels in the image sensor.

WYSIWTCSEDISB: What You See Is What The Camera Software Engineer Decided It Should Be.
Go to
Feb 25, 2024 21:57:20   #
Vladimir200 wrote:
JohnFrim, that's a good one. How about this one....... "If a person is under investigation (Trump referring to Hillary), then that person should NOT be running for President". Even though Hillary was being investigated, she was exonerated and never indited as we all know.


Excellent!!!

I suppose Trump's defence on that point is that he will claim the investigations are already done; now it is just a matter of "persecutions."
Go to
Feb 23, 2024 23:14:05   #
tramsey wrote:
Several years ago It was brought up before the Supreme Court if a fetus was a human if if was unable to live outside the womb. They passed on it and sent it back to the lower court. I wonder if it will get that far


But my point is that survival of ANY embryo outside the womb has nothing to do with defining or identifying the species (human, cow, goat, cat, dog, ...).

An embryo is formed by the union of sperm and ova from "parents" of a species, and the embryo WILL BE that same species.

The real nut to crack is defining when k*****g a human embryo, or allowing it to die, constitutes a crime. A******n laws generally consider whether the embryo or fetus can survive on its own, and medical science is moving that time point earlier and earlier toward conception, which would be the ultimate earliest time point.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 926 next>>
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.