Posts for: gkl
Sep 7, 2020 13:22:12 #
Sequence captured during 30 minutes from our deck, a new house. Hope to have many more in the days to come.
Jul 14, 2020 09:21:24 #
I have an "old" Epson V500, V600 is the update, within your price range. I find the most flexible inversion from negative to positive for print is the Adobe plug-in Negative Scan Pro and not any of the bundled conversion software. I had posted these images before but repeat here FYI:
Epson V500 scanner, 48-bit, 4800dpi, positive film, no ICC profile, TIFF. Inverted using Adobe plugin Negative Scan Pro, edited in Photoshop (multiple despeckle) and Nik (RAW sharpener), Lightroom (output sharpener).
The post processing is essential for prints. Have fun.
Gkl
Epson V500 scanner, 48-bit, 4800dpi, positive film, no ICC profile, TIFF. Inverted using Adobe plugin Negative Scan Pro, edited in Photoshop (multiple despeckle) and Nik (RAW sharpener), Lightroom (output sharpener).
The post processing is essential for prints. Have fun.
Gkl
Jul 2, 2020 15:44:55 #
Uuglypher wrote:
#2 is my pick.
The relative depth of the significant realms are more clearly percepyible than in #1
Dave
The relative depth of the significant realms are more clearly percepyible than in #1
Dave
Thanks for your comment.
Jun 12, 2020 21:20:12 #
PoppieJ wrote:
I like #2. 1 looks somehow out of focus, or no detail, or something that makes it almost an abstract. You could use it for that purpose with just a little bit of PP. 2 on the other hand looks like I am really there.
Interesting comments. thanks.
Jun 6, 2020 13:42:08 #
John from gpwmi wrote:
Agree with #2 and it needs to be printed BIG.
Agreed, thanks
Jun 6, 2020 13:34:48 #
Jun 5, 2020 15:18:25 #
Thanks to all who haved commented on my previous. I did a edit of II. comments? Thanks
Jun 5, 2020 12:49:41 #
Jun 5, 2020 09:05:52 #
Jun 4, 2020 17:01:19 #
R.G. wrote:
I've noticed that with dark shots much depends on the size of the image that you're viewing. #2 will look good at any size but #1 will benefit from being printed large. Make it too small and it'll be too dark. You probably wanted it dark for the sake of the atmosphere that comes with the darkness, but if you make it too small you'll lose that atmosphere.
Yes should open-up I a bit, thanks.
Jun 4, 2020 16:59:20 #
Jun 4, 2020 15:56:43 #
Would appreciate any comments. Thanks in advance.
May 11, 2020 08:56:45 #
huntmj wrote:
#2 is amazing well done
Thanks
May 10, 2020 21:42:26 #
May 10, 2020 09:54:46 #
Tjohn wrote:
All good. Like the 1st 2 best.
Scanning film isn't so easy is it.
Scanning film isn't so easy is it.
It has taken a number of years and attempts without out spending $$$, only time. Glad you like these images, thanks. Should have used Kodak Pro-Ektar instead of KODAKCOLOR. I am scanning some Pro-Ektar images from S America, the results are much better, I think.