So it was not hard to imagine that something like this was going to happen though not exactly how I imagined it.

Reprint: - POLITICS 35-Year-Old Woman Accused Of Sexting And Giving Drugs To Teens, Told Authorities She Identifies As 15-Year-Old Boy

A 35-year-old Washington woman allegedly told authorities she identifies as a 15-year-old boy after she was arrested for harboring runaway teens and accused of providing them with drugs and alcohol and sexting them.

Amanda Dorrough was charged with unlawful harboring of minors earlier this month after police said they discovered Dorrough planned to flee Seattle with a group of teenagers, Fox News reported. The adult woman was arrested on May 4 after the vice principal at Port Angeles High School, northwest of Seattle, reportedly contacted police after two students revealed their plan to run away with Dorrough, who went by the nickname “Taz” with the group of teens.

Dorrough, who the Daily Mail reports is a mother of three children, allegedly told Clallam County Jail staff that she identifies as a 15-year-old boy.

“She feels like teenagers ‘understand’ her better” and that “she ‘identifies’ better with teenage kids,” the report said.

Police found Dorrough in a gully with a boy amid a heap of blankets, “two empty condom packets, one unopened condom, a bra, and an empty cigarette packet with a lighter,” according to the police report. At least 10 different incident reports received by police allegedly involved Borrough and her relationship with minors.


Neighbors reportedly called the police after witnessing minors enter and leave Dorrough’s apartment regularly. One neighbor also said the adult woman was seen topless in the hallway with a boy who appeared to be around 13 years old, according to the report. Police also said that Dorrough was kicked out of a Boys and Girls Club over “perceived ‘predatory’ behavior.”

When police arrived at the woman’s apartment on May 2, two days before her arrest, they spotted three teenagers running through the parking lot away from Dorrough’s apartment. One officer reportedly heard movement inside Dorrough’s apartment, but police were unable to talk to anyone inside.

The police report — which was first reported by radio host Jason Rantz — alleges that the adult woman got naked in front of minors, touched one inappropriately, and gave them marijuana. One of Dorrough’s alleged victims reportedly told authorities that the 35-year-old woman was “p*******e-ish.” When one of the minors told Dorrough he wasn’t interested in her, she allegedly got upset and said she would k**l herself.

Dorrough was not charged with any sexual offenses and was released on bond on May 14, just 10 days after her arrest.

California Democrat v**ers are some of the dumbest people on the planet.

Store closures are hitting Downtown San Francisco as office vacancies and fears of crime are on the rise.

Here's the list of retailers pulling out of the city's downtown neighborhood.

Old Navy is the latest store to shut down in downtown San Francisco
Saks off 5th, which will close "no later than this fall,"
Anthropologie announced it will close its Market Street location this month
Whole Foods closed its store at Trinity Place on Market Street last month.
Office Depot
Nordstrom
Arc'teryx
RealReal
CB2
Banana Republic
Athleta
The Container Store
Crate & Barrel
Abercrombie & Fitch
DSW
Disney
Uniqlo
Marshall'
H&M
Gap

Yep, the Democrat v**ers keep v****g for the same politicians who not only can't fix the problems, but contribute to the problems.

Actually Frank, millionaires do not pay less than you do, the top 10% pays over 70% of all income taxes. Now if the democrats have their way and continue to destroy the economic prospects of the American middle class I may soon join you in demanding that the rich pay all the taxes because nobody else will be able to afford them after paying for housing and food.

Again you come to us with the same old BS story that Reagan's and Trump's tax cuts fed the deficits, I want to be clear, Bush spent too much because he involved us in an unneeded war in Iraq, and Trump just spent too much period, but the percentage of tax receipts to GDP last year was the highest in over 20 years, so no, I don't buy yours and the left's lies that tax cuts hurt federal revenues, Reagan's cuts proved this as well as we are now seeing the results of Trump's cuts.

The current law passed in the House does limit spending, so there is that, be it DeSantis or Trump that comes into the White House will be restrained in their spending unless laws are changed which would come at a high political cost to a Republican House should they pass such legislation.

BTW, the media and the Democrats are screaming that the world as we know it will end if the Debt Ceiling is not raised......... But....... Biden goes to the beach and the Senate goes to recess.

OK lets say you are correct that Trump had classified docs in 4 secured locations and knew he had them, I can't verify if what you say is true but I will go with that. How is that worse than Biden having classified docs in multiple UNSECURED locations and not knowing that he had them????? LOOL It's YOU that is full of BULL. Yes, it was requested that Trump add another lock to make the doc more secure, the location and room was already secure, they just wanted additional security. Why do you have to lie about all this?? Why are you lying about not being a Lefty?? WE all know you are a far lefty and lying about it.

I have not read the case law either. BUT it would seem to be if the law only dealt with doctor/patient privacy matters there would be no need for the case to ever have reached the Supreme Court. Doctors and patients have had privacy for as long as I can remember. If not for the a******n matter what would make SCOTUS have any interest in the case at all?

Do you not recall the Left telling us women have the RIGHT to an a******n under the Constitution even though the Constitution does not mention a******n anywhere in the document?

Dennis

This onlooker senses that if females took the a******n pill in a timely manner, then the hubbub over a******n would dwindle significantly -- because this pill the females can buy and take with no medical procedure required. Females can buy this pill off the shelf or via the mail. By this means, a******n remains a private matter free of the fanatical anti-a******n crowd.

The Supreme Court has found that no constitutional right to a******n exists. This ruling left the matter of regulating a******n to the states (in a win for states' rights). This shift of authority, however, has introduced dramatic variance in the right to a******n on demand, by outlawing it even.

We shall see how it goes.