The dispensaries are running out, so the state is mulling over letting more open?
Do I have that right? Yes. Yes, I do.
Supply is short, so let's open more dispensaries.
Something is terribly wrong there.
Oh, wait. I get it. The government of Nevada is responsible for the shortage.

Can you read?

You mean like v**ers here in the US are bused around?

http://projectveritas.com/2016/10/11/hidden-camera-nyc-democratic-e******n-commissioner-they-bus-people-around-to-v**e/

You're welcome!
The mechanics of warfare is fascinating to me. The lengths men will go to to kill each other is just amazing.

The AC-130 has a 75mm semi-auto as well. Extremely effective.
However, it's not the size that makes for good anti-armor fire, it's the speed as well. That's why the A-10 has the GAU-8 30mm gun - not only is this gun firing a higher speed round, but the 75mm didn't have anything as effective for penetrating the heavy armor of WWII, like the Tigers and Panthers.
And, of course, we've all heard that the B-25s firing the 75mm would come to a complete stop when the gun fired. (For the uninitiated, that's impossible; if the plane stopped, it would fall out of the air.)

Well, it used to be.

Thank you!
Stolen!

Trump is now a politician, therefore he lies.
Like all politicians. Even Democrats.
Why is this so surprising?

What I don't get is this...
A wedding is supposed to be something that is a once in a lifetime thing. No matter who is getting married.
If *I* were getting married, why would I want to force someone who didn't want to make the wedding cake to do so?
"We wanted VANILLA!! Is that so difficult???"
"Sorry, my assistant got confused, and used walnut instead. I am so sorry. Here's your money back."
Why not hire someone who is much more likely to get it right?
Otherwise, it smacks of simply looking for another wedding present from someone who wasn't invited to the wedding.

My answer to Bunko is good for you, too.
If you think they want to stay away, you are sadly misinformed.

"Stay away"???
I think you're confused. They are being denied entry. It's not a case of them not wanting to come, it's a case of they aren't allowed to come.
If you don't want to come to live (or even visit), that's OK. We won't force you.
People still come here illegally; I'm not sure if your news media tells you otherwise, but it's true. They are even willing to risk robbery, beatings, rape and murder in Mexico to get here, then willing to cross a desert to get where they want toi go, and they know they are often led into s***ery once they get here (in, of all places, the West Coast, the most "people friendly" place in the US).
They want to stay away? I guess some do, but others recognize the US for what it is: the land of opportunity.

Alligators aren't as comfortable in salt water as crocodiles, but live well in brackish water.
Check their range here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_alligator

Yes, but mostly no.
Operation Wide Receiver was done under Bush, but it had several differences from Fast and Furious.
Wide Receiver coordinated with the Mexican government, Fast and Furious didn't. Under Obama, the gun walking program simply allowed the guns to walk into Mexico, without telling the Mexican government.
Wide Receiver put tracking devices into the guns, so we and the Mexican government knew where the guns went after they crossed the border; Fast and Furious had no tracking devices, so once the guns left the shop, no one in charge knew where they went. When the tracking devices were discovered (which was always a near certainty), Wide Receiver was shut down.
Wide Receiver, in order to implant the devices, was more orderly in which guns were sold to who (whom?), while Fast and Furious had far less control over who bought the guns (first come, first served).
IOW, Fast and Furious, while presented as a "sting" operation, actually netted very few straw buyers, because there was no way to gather any evidence after the guns were sold. Knowing which guns were sold to who says nothing about where they ended up. The Mexican government was not consulted, nor was it told the guns were even being sold with the intent to "track" them into Mexico (which they weren't).

In that case, it should have been, "No thanks. I have only one *." (note the second ")
Sometimes punctuation is essential.
In this case, "No thanks. I have only one *. looks like the "*" is supposed to be a """; a typo, IOW.
Now that I know what it was supposed to be, it makes sense.