Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Posts for: SonyBug
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 193 next>>
May 31, 2021 08:55:08   #
A great set of the canyon. First I have seen with blue water in the Colorado.
Go to
May 31, 2021 08:48:24   #
Rab-Eye wrote:
I’ve done that. No fun.


Me too. But thanks to an annual check to State Farm, the insurance covered every cent.
Go to
May 28, 2021 07:17:22   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Although you asked about metering, I find the shutterspeed is more important for older prop planes. To achieve a blur for prop planes, you should be in the 1/200sec to 1/320sec range on the shutter. Ideally, you'll be in manual to control both the shutter and aperture so you have wing-tip to wing-tip depth of field. The acrobatic planes can be in the 1/400sec range.

I don't trust any of the partial meter readings and whether they will actual meter what is relevant for a moving subject. Did I really have a 5% portion of the frame exactly on the relevant portion of a fast moving subject? Rather, Sony's "Multi" will meter the entire frame and you can predict how it will respond to a blue (or cloudy) sky. If you use Shutter or Aperture priority modes, use a +1 EC to tell the camera to brighten the frame so you don't end up with a noisey underexposed sky. In manual, adjust the ISO to position the meter at +1 over the 0-mark.

For the actual day, take some test shots even before the planes are in the air. If you have some white clouds where the planes will fly, use them to confirm if you can push the exposure more to the right. If the clouds are blinking in the test images, you have the ISO too high. Use f/8 to f/11 for the depth of field and to give some options of the ISO at or above ISO-100. If the clouds in your test image are not blinking with the meter at +1, test where they start blinking as you push the exposure to the right. You may be at +1.3 to +1.7 to the right of the 0-mark, depending on the sky and time of day.

The image below is 1/250 sec (for the blur), f/10 and ISO-125 at an extended 600mm. The image was brighter coming out of the camera than the edited result. The whites were white without being over exposed. On a similar day to the example below, if you fixed your shutter at 1/250 in shutter priority and the ISO at ISO-100 with the EC at / around +1, the camera will handle the aperture easily between f/8 and f/11. You just have to pan, focus and shoot.

Final tip, capture the planes at their closest point while still coming toward the camera and passing. After they've passed will an easier shot, but less interesting. It can take all day (or multiple days) to get your panning technique so that you smoothly track the moving subjects and release the shutter in 3- to 5-frame bursts. Each plane will likely make several passes, practice and prepare with each pass, and hopefully at least 1 excellent keeper comes from every plane.

Warbirds over Oshkosh by Paul Sager, on Flickr
Although you asked about metering, I find the shut... (show quote)


Great advice. Also look at the overlap of the wings. This was a extremely dangerous stunt!
Go to
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
May 22, 2021 07:43:31   #
Curmudgeon wrote:
Nice capture. We used to catch them with fishing flies. Bull Frogs with a gig (legal) .22 CB caps (illegal). Roll them in corn meal and fry them up in bacon grease


Pellet gun at night with a flashlight. Helps to own the ponds you hunt in...
Go to
May 21, 2021 08:16:41   #
Thorny Devil wrote:
I recently purchased a new Sony A7Riii camera and Sony 24-105 f/4 lens. I can change shutter speed or aperture independently in manual mode but when I try to use either aperture or shutter speed priority both change when I rotate either the front or rear dials. Is this a "Sony" thing or am I missing something. I am not using auto ISO.

What have I missed when setting up the camera?

Please note that due to the time difference between Australia and the rest of the world I will be off line for several hours before I can respond to any posts in answer to this.

Regards,

Richard.
I recently purchased a new Sony A7Riii camera and ... (show quote)


Richard, just saw you are from Alice Springs. I sure wish I could get to Aussie Land and A.S. would be one of the first places on my bucket list. Have heard a lot about it and even checked it out on Google Earth a bit. Have fun down there, Mate!
Go to
May 21, 2021 08:10:39   #
jackm1943 wrote:
Captured 22 years ago on film in San Antonio, first time I've done anything with it.


Looks like it was from a different century!
Go to
May 21, 2021 07:46:38   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
You might need to explain better. If you're in Aperture Priority and change the aperture say from f/4 to f/8, you'd expect the shutterspeed to adjust dynamically as well so the camera can maintain the same exposure as the photographer adjusts the dominate exposure setting of the mode being used. That is, for ISO 100 at f/4 and 1/100 is the same exposure as ISO-100 at f/8 and 1/50. If you change from f/4 to f/8 for a fixed ISO, the camera will adjust the shutterspeed.

If you mean rather the dials on the front of the camera and the rear of the camera both adjust the same setting, literally titled the 'front' and 'rear' dials, welcome to Sony a7 camera models ...
You might need to explain better. If you're in Ape... (show quote)


To add to what Paul says, if you want to decrease exposure for example, use the +/- dial (also shown as E.V. dial).
Go to
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
May 21, 2021 07:42:18   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
What did Rockwell say in his 2018 a7III review introduction?

Ans: Dollar-for-dollar, the Sony A7 III is the world's best full-frame mirrorless camera ever created.

https://www.kenrockwell.com/sony/a7-iii.htm


Paul, you and Ken have it right. I am a huge proponent of the A7III as it does all I want it to do and more!
Go to
May 21, 2021 07:41:18   #
User ID wrote:
Here on UHH the a7III is dismissed as a dated but still usable basic model. Never was state of the art, and now it’s aging.

But as you’ve discovered, in the real world it kicks real world butt ;-)


User ID, I don't know where your info came on that camera, but I have one and disagree that it is considered a basic model, and not state of the art. Maybe you should consider that state of the art is a model that let's (helps) a photographer achieve his/her goals. I certainly agree that in the real world, it kicks butt. And isn't that what we are all after?
Go to
May 19, 2021 07:14:35   #
Thomas902 wrote:
"That Canon fast glass also has more CA than a 4th of July fireworks display wide open... horrific magenta halos around high contrast out of focus areas... On the downloads look at the edges of his white shirt in the last image... and around both of their upper bodies in the first image... Sadly if you had stop down to f/1.8 or f/2.0 those halos would have all but vanished...


Yes, first thing I noticed. The warmth of the shots is unmistakable, but the technical aspect is critical to the shoot.
Go to
May 17, 2021 12:17:49   #
DeanS wrote:
Not sure about this SB. Normally, when I position the cursor over the dl, the plus sign appears. In the two instances mentioned, no plus sign.

Thanks for your ananydis.


In my test, the plus did show up. It just showed a very small difference in the photos.

Regards...
Go to
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
May 17, 2021 08:09:06   #
Think of it this way. When you upload you actually send 3 pictures. The first is a thumbnail you see on the first post, the second is almost the full size (DL) and the third is the full size picture(DDL). On this picture the second is very nearly the size of the third, so while it is displaying the DDL, it is almost the same as the DL so it does not look like it works, but it is. The solution is to upload a larger image and then it will work. What size image did you upload?
Go to
May 13, 2021 15:56:16   #
DickC wrote:
She did a show, at a 'Club' on Morrison Road in Denver, many years ago, she was a knockout!!!
Dick


I met and knew her in a club in New Orleans in about 1982. You are right about a knockout, and a really nice person!
Go to
May 13, 2021 12:13:11   #
Timmers wrote:
Yes, totally agree with you. You are a lucky guy!

Through my brother I got to know the Champaign Girl out of New Orleans; the ladies were all inter connected and supportive of each other, well, most! LOL!!!


Do you mean Charlotte Champaign? I almost dated her, but the only time we could go out was at 2 a.m. when she finished her show. That was way too late for a guy who started the day at 7 a.m. and my job and paycheck were way to important to me. A lost opportunity that I always wondered "what if"?
Go to
May 13, 2021 07:33:55   #
Drbobcameraguy wrote:
I just read that the D3 works better in low light than either the D5 or the D850. I know it has huge pixels on the sensor compared to the others. Am I missing something? The dynamic range and of course mp are lower but I'm just looking for the very best low light Nikon I can afford. Think bargain for f glass without adapters. I have a lot more research to do. Was just asking for others knowledge of the subject. I'm not interested in spending over 1000 or 1200 bucks basically.


Same sensor as the d700 and the d700 is an upgraded camera. Had one when they came out and I still think that it is as good as anything I have used since then.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 193 next>>
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.