Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Pine1
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 26 next>>
Mar 16, 2014 13:54:59   #
Absolutely beautiful!
catgirl wrote:
Treepusher, she is just simply put "Gorgeous"
Go to
Mar 16, 2014 13:46:30   #
I corrected myself earlier in that I said back focus rather than back button focus which is what I meant. Sorry.
steve_stoneblossom wrote:
You are correct.

Could be that I am mistaken, but the OP seems to be asking how to back focus. Since back focus seems to be more a problem to overcome than an objective to achieve, I assumed (there I go again... when will I learn?) that the Jeff Cable video he said he was watching addressed back button focusing.

Pine1, can you clarify for us please? Back focus or back button focus?
Go to
Mar 16, 2014 13:43:25   #
I bought mine from Banana Republic. I was a building contractor and carried all kinds of junk. It isn't water proof but it has more pockets than one can use. I used to love it and I think I will love it again since I have lost so much weight. It does have a few water proof pockets.
Frisco wrote:
I too, have been considering a photographer's vest. Is it really waterproof?
What brands would you recommend?
Go to
Mar 16, 2014 12:58:27   #
I like all 3. Thanks for sharing.
snipe wrote:
I have always enjoyed photographing these three iconic "birds of prey"
Go to
Mar 16, 2014 12:28:23   #
lol. I just remembered a photographer's vest I bought about 30 years ago. I just pulled it out and it fits. Thank you for the reminder.
Clip-er wrote:
I traded my backpack for a photographers vest.( see avatar) I prefer it,it's hands free. It would hold all the things you mentioned, except the tripod. I haven't found a good way to carry mine yet. Hope this helps. Thx Clipper.
Go to
Mar 16, 2014 12:01:57   #
I have 2 PC's I have virtually quit using since I uploaded Windows 8, ugh! I have switched everything to Mac's and I'm pretty happy but I'm still miffed about Windows 8.
Pigseye wrote:
Hi, Have you tried http://www.oldversion.com/ Personally I was suckered into Windows 8 and whine everytime I use it. Fortunately I still have a Windows 7 machine that I use.

Good luck.
Go to
Mar 16, 2014 11:36:27   #
Good idea. Thank you.
Go to
Mar 16, 2014 10:58:38   #
I have 2 bags. I have one to carry most of my gear while traveling and one I use as a day pack to carry only what I think I need for the day (and it doesn't look like a camera pack). I hope that helps.
Go to
Mar 16, 2014 10:52:57   #
Welcome to UHH. You might still be able to get LR5 and CS6 from the Adobe cloud for about $10.00 per month. I tend to use Photoshop (CS6) for everything. I have the Adobe Cloud and I really like it. Others may have a different opinion. Have fun.
Go to
Mar 16, 2014 07:22:48   #
I really like UHH and I enjoy most of the forums. I especially like the Main Photography Forum, the Photo Gallery and, yes, the PC & A Forum. I consider myself to be a newbie and I am striving to learn more and more every day. I think all the forums have something to offer in the way of advancing photography. After all, isn't that what this is all about? I haven't posted anything on the PC&A forum because I don't think I have captured a shot that is worthy of "high critique". I really like to see people like Mr. Smith post shots because he is teaching me composition on a high level. I have seen Nightski critique his shots as well as others. I can't add anything to help him because he is on a different level. But I do reserve the right to comment and occasionally do. On the other hand, I have posted a few shots in the Photo Gallery and asked for and received valuable feedback. I appreciate the candid responses. If I had a shot that was almost really, really good, I would post it in the PC&A forum and request feedback. The Main Photography Forum is what it is and has been very valuable to me. With all this being said, I don't belong to any group or click nor will I ever. It is unpleasing to see bickering between members of what I consider to be one of the very best sites on the Internet. If you have personal differences or rags to chew then why don't you just PM each other. I understand some people just like to argue or feed conflict but if you don't like something it's okay. But don't make it personal.
Go to
Mar 15, 2014 19:45:34   #
Welcome to UHH. The D3200 is a great camera. This is a good place to kick start learning what it's all about. There are a lot of professional and semi-professional photographers here that are more than willing to advise you. Don't be afraid to ask questions and ,especially, don't be afraid of the answers. Many members here tend to be candid and direct. That's not a bad thing if you learn from it. Have fun.
Lisa Lewis wrote:
I have always enjoyed photography and have a passion for it. I recently purchased a nikon d3200 is this a good camera to start the next step in starting a studio buisness in the future?
Go to
Mar 15, 2014 18:53:21   #
I have a D7100 and I have found that I never use the Jpegs so I shoot RAW only. I suppose if I was shooting "snapshots" I might use Jpeg but I have an RX100 for that. Even then I shoot RAW. Have fun.
Saleavitt10 wrote:
I have a Nikon D7100. I have set it up to right raw to card 1 and jpeg to card 2. I photograph birds quite often and we all know how fast they can be. I have been using SanDisk Ultra's which are class 10, 30MB/s cards. I shoot birds in the Continuous High shooting speeds and it takes approx. 20 seconds to free up the buffer for more shots. If I go with a faster write speed card for card slot 1 do I also need the same speed card in slot 2 or does it matter? I am assuming it won't matter since the jpegs being written to card 2 are so much smaller than the raw being written to card 1.

Thanks for your opinions.
I have a Nikon D7100. I have set it up to right r... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 15, 2014 18:43:12   #
This is a great book.
chapjohn wrote:
Two things to consider:

1. Instead of trying to wade through the manual tha came with the camera, find an after market book for that camera. These books are written to be undetstood.

2. To learn more about photography, get the 3rd edition of Bryan Peterson's book "Understanding Exposure."
Go to
Mar 15, 2014 09:49:30   #
Amateur only.
Go to
Mar 15, 2014 09:44:49   #
First, you haven't damaged my ego. I like candid responses and I appreciate your input. I haven't hidden the fact that I am a newbie and it's fairly evident that I have resources to acquire what I wish. However, I don't waste money and never have. I am gaining skills and in a large part, I have to thank UHH for that. I do a search on most things I am considering but I have discovered that some of the results are outdated by months. Things change quickly in this age of rapid technology advancement. One reason I ask questions is that I want to know what others think currently. I did this in business and in play and I found it to be very useful. I apologize if my questions are old news to you and are a waste of your knowledge and time but, you don't have to read them or respond. UHH'ers have been extremely helpful and freely give of their knowledge and experience. I sincerely appreciate all. I will continue to ask novice questions, researched or not, until I am kicked off, leave of my own accord or die. I will also reach out to others I can share with if I think I can help regardless of the level of experience they may have. I will never belittle anyone or their questions. That is just how I am made. As a side note, I am still undecided whether or not I will immediately plunge into the FX world but I will at some point. Have fun.
gessman wrote:
I'm about to bruise some egos here:

Pine1, this is a personal decision. You appear to be a grown man enjoying some of the fruits of your labor and some of the nicer things in life, judging from your profile image. Do you ordinarily sit around and wait on others to tell you what you should do in a situation where an obvious philosophical decision needs to be made knowing that you are only going to start a controversial discussion that is going to result in nothing decisive being achieved. I like "rent a 610 for a week (or maybe an 800) and see for yourself."

For the rest of my fellow members, if we could possibly stick to reality and dispense with terms of extremes such as "indispensable for shooting wildlife," when it isn't, or "rediculously shallow depth of field" when "ridiculously shallow depth of field" is a woefully inaccurate comment given that there is no such animal, it would help us advise others more accurately. By all means, state your opinion but please stay away from exaggeration. You have no horse in this race so quit insisting by using prevarication that another person "do it your way." It will be beneficial for newbies observing if you make your comments so they more neutrally present the facts rather than putting on a slanted high pressure sales pitch like you have a stake in the outcome.

While I'm at it, for those of you who are fairly new to uhh, having posted some images to indicate that you can use your camera as well as you can talk about it goes a long way with some of us old geezers when it comes to taking what you have to say very seriously. And please don't use the excuse that you're not going to post anything for fear of someone stealing it. If you can sound like a consummate expert, you have been at this for a long time, and if that's the case there's not a single one of you who does not have at least one outstanding image you can sacrificially post to demonstrate that you can "walk the walk." I personally would like to see at least a few, maybe a dozen, of your shots from a variety of subject matter to demonstrate that you are more than a "one trick pony." If you only shoot one thing, as some do, then for sure posting multiple images would be a good thing, and remember, I said "if you don't want some of us to ignore what you have to say." If you can't "walk the walk" then perhaps you should not "talk the talk," but rather should just be quiet and get a free education like many of us do most of the time. There are several world class photographers in uhh and most of them are being noticeably quiet rather than argue with some of you who often don't know what you're talking about.

If you don't care whether people take you seriously or not then maybe you're wasting your time and ours in observing your comments. I should think that some of you would see that as a challenge to present your credentials, whatever they are. I'm not big on credentials but now and then when dealing with a complicated subject rife with subjectivity, it's nice and of some appreciable benefit to show some moral authority rather than everyone having to endure an attempt to bully the masses by swamping them with mere words. This is a photography forum about photographic images and "a picture is worth a thousand words." Show some!

Also while I'm unintentionally bruising egos and making future enemies here, let me just suggest that when you choose to reply to a comment someone has made, please use the "Quote reply" button so we will know which previous comment it is to which you refer or at least be courteous enough to use the persons name to which you are replying and summarize or repeat the comment you are addressing. When you choose to post a comment and it hangs out in midair apparently attached to nothing, it tends to make little sense and is therefore a useless waste of everyone's time and only makes you appear to be a person who goes around making nonsensical remarks, sometimes referred to as "stupid."

Those of you to whom my words do not apply, please do not take up some moralistic cause here and tell me what an ass I am. For the rest of you, if the shoe fits, wear it! And oh yow, I might be able to describe what the wrong side of the bed looks like this morning. :shock: :roll: :mrgreen: :thumbup:
I'm about to bruise some egos here: br br Pine1, ... (show quote)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 26 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.