Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: tita1948
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 23 next>>
Jul 27, 2016 11:04:30   #
Nice job. It's so hard for me to get a great moon. Well done!
Go to
Jul 27, 2016 11:00:54   #
Hands down #4
Go to
Jan 21, 2016 18:43:34   #
Good news. Canon could not get the spot off my sensor on my SX50. So they sent me a new SX60, no charge What a great company.

yea! :D
Go to
Jan 11, 2016 12:20:18   #
Chicopee wrote:
I have the same type of spot, tho not as large on my Nikon D50. It usually shows up w/ the blue hues.
Rather than send it in, I have been able to use the CLONE STAMP in my Photo Elements 11.....I think its a common 'tool'. certainly worth a try....has worked for me 100%
Good Luck


Well I did send it in only because it was still under warranty. Thank goodness. Hope I get it back soon.
Go to
Jan 1, 2016 17:37:20   #
MontanaTrace wrote:
A refurbished SX50 is $149.99.

Currently out of stock. They have some. Explain your dilemma. Canon may release one.


Thank you I will.
Go to
Jan 1, 2016 16:33:33   #
Thank you everybody except Jackdoor. That idea scares the beejeebers out of me.lol

Today is a good day to try the shooting the sky idea as we have clear skies here is the NW.

Thanks everybody.

BTW I did buy this camera referb from Canon. Think they would help?
Go to
Dec 31, 2015 18:01:02   #
MtnMan wrote:
I suppose you need to send it in.

I presume you cropped massively to show it? Sensor spots are usually small. But then the sensor in this camera might be small...in which case the spot would appear large.


Darn....
Go to
Dec 31, 2015 12:53:30   #
I have a spot on my SX50 camera I guess it's on the sensor. But since I can't remove the lens how do I clean it?


(Download)
Go to
Dec 3, 2015 14:18:06   #
pecohen wrote:
I don't use Lightroom but there are several answers addressing how to use Lightroom for that purpose. Let me address more general aspects of your question.

You probably are sending JPEG files to your editor unless your editor has specifically requested another format. There are two things that make a JPEG file big.

An important factor is the number of pixels and many cameras today will provide more than you likely need; you should reduce the image to whatever is appropriate. If the image is to be printed in a high-class glossy magazine then you will probably need many more pixels than if it is to be printed in a newspaper. Discuss with your editor what dimensions in pixels are needed and reduce your image dimensions appropriately.

The second issue is the compression factor. When you save a JPEG file you will probably find a menu to adjust the compression factor (and possibly a check-box for whether or not to compress). You probably do want to compress the image unless it is to be edited and re-edited later - again, ask your editor what he or she wants. Be aware that compressing the image will reduce the quality - though you probably will not see the difference with only a small amount of compression and even with a large amount you may have to look very carefully to see the difference.
I don't use Lightroom but there are several answer... (show quote)


Thank you. Yes I think I will start taking the pictures at a lower pixel value.
Thank again.
Go to
Dec 2, 2015 16:49:03   #
When I send photos to my editor he says my files are too big. How do I make them smaller in Lightroom.
Go to
Nov 9, 2015 22:14:55   #
I have not forgotten you I just had some things come up. I will get back to you soon.

Thanks for your advice.
Go to
Nov 6, 2015 16:55:20   #
Why is it that after I imported my photos in LR5 some photos say loading and calculating for ever and ever. It just goes round and round. Is there a way to make it go faster. Some are sharp right away.

Remember I said I already imported the photos now I'm in the library mode trying to see which ones I'll keep. Some photos are clear right away some take forever.

Please help me figure this out.
Go to
Aug 4, 2015 12:02:16   #
Searcher wrote:
Put eggs in boiling water, bring back to boil, turn off heat and leave for exactly twelve minutes.

That works.


Oh James really is that the best you can do?
Go to
Jul 19, 2015 18:20:38   #
Linda From Maine wrote:
There is also a 510 without a viewfinder.

Rather than hold out away from your body, see if you can hold it closer, with arms against your sides, elbows down, and still see through the LCD.


Good to see you again. :-)
Go to
May 22, 2015 12:02:35   #
planepics wrote:
I just got the canon e-mail myself yesterday. I've been debating getting a p/s or bridge to take along with me on a 2-week overseas trip next year rather than taking my DSLR kit (or most of it) and saving weight (I can buy more souvenirs and save my neck). Let me know what you think of it. I've seen some good reviews. Also thinking about a Sony. I still have a vast majority of my trip to pay for yet, though so I probably won't get one right away. Not including the airfare it's $2,800! It will be the longest trip by 4 days and by far the most expensive, but going to the Holy Land is on my bucket list.
I just got the canon e-mail myself yesterday. I'v... (show quote)


I will be traveling this weekend and hope to post some pix. But I have to say I wish I had this camera when I went to Italy and Amsterdam last year. Would have saved a lot of weight.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 23 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.