Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Jackdoor
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 63 next>>
Jan 3, 2017 08:55:38   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Well, you know what your have to do.


No, he's too late. By at least 950 years.
Go to
Jan 3, 2017 08:36:16   #
I like the halo effect, but puzzled- what do you mean by 'the clouds that should be behind the moon and not visible...' You're never going to find Earthly clouds behind the moon!
Go to
Jan 3, 2017 08:13:21   #
BrentHarder wrote:
As a photographer (and and artist) everywhere I go, I seek to find the unusual, the different, the subjects that most people would overlook......that is why I called this post "Photos from the local mall (observe)".
Always observe and find the potential in each scene that you are presented with. Look for patterns, off the wall ideas and compositions that are not "typical". Even a local mall has endless photo opportunities. I'm presenting 10 photos to you. Please download them for best viewing results.
As a photographer (and and artist) everywhere I go... (show quote)


Great stuff! Shows the difference between just 'looking', and actually seeing.
Go to
Jan 3, 2017 06:28:30   #
pecohen wrote:
I have a related question:

There seems to be a broad consensus that when shooting with a tripod, IS should be turned off (I just wish I could remember to do this and then remember to turn IS back on). Sadly, I just don't always remember to do what I know I should do.

But, what if the tripod is sitting on a surface that is vibrating? I'm thinking of taking along a tripod on a cruise in a few months - to take some shots from the deck when the ship is in port. Of course with passengers on-board, the engines will be running and so the deck will likely be vibrating a bit. But steady vibration should be easy for IS to compensate for. At least that is my thinking.
I have a related question: br br There seems to b... (show quote)


My own experience is that IS is great at correcting for low frequency movement such as when hand-holding, but higher frequencies produced by machinery vibration will transmit through a tripod, and defeat it. On a ship, better to lean yourself against something, or rest your arm against a rail, and hand-hold. Otherwise a small bean-bag or rolled-up towel helps
Go to
Dec 28, 2016 11:26:58   #
Rloren wrote:
Hello,
Just bought my first DSLR..Nikon D-3300. I used to shoot film years ago. I only have the kit lens..18-55mm.
I need a second lens..telephoto. I shoot mainly outdoors, nature, landscape, etc. From my research I see a large selection
and "price differences." Want to buy a good lens, but don't want to break the bank. The biggest bang for the buck.
Don't want to buy a 200mm max and then wish I bought a 300mm or 400mm.
What would you recommend I buy.
Thank you...


In your situation the biggest bang for your buck would be a refurb or used Tamron 150-600 or Sigma contemproary. Little to choose between them.
Go to
Dec 22, 2016 10:08:01   #
Ikonomos wrote:
Hi,
I can't make up my mind on what to buy.
Nikon 50mm G 1.8 @$299
Nikon 35mm G 1.8 @ $ 650 ( used )
Nikkor 23mm AF 2.8 @ $295 (Used)
All in Australian dollars.
I am looking for a light weight lens to carry around all day on my 610, for street & landscape photography, occasionally with people included.
I need it to be fast also as I like shooting the above in low light & at night, both indoors & out.
I also have a limited budget of under $1000.
Any advice would be much appreciated.
Hi, br I can't make up my mind on what to buy. b... (show quote)


Street, landscapes? Forget the 50. As for the others, always remember, if you can't get close enough to frame properly, you can crop and still get something. If you can't get far enough away to frame something, you don't get the image. So for your light weight lens, I'd go for the 23mm. Personally, the 24-120 makes more sense, but heavier!
Go to
Dec 21, 2016 16:51:10   #
pwrxprt wrote:
Thanks for this info....I think most of the members, no matter where they live in the US, can capture some great images of this eclipse, even a partial as in my case. I've heard never to point your camera directly into the sun as it could damage your sensor....with that said do you or others think a 10 stop neutral density filter would be dark enough to shoot a timelapse of the eclipse without damaging the sensor in your camera, in particular, a Nikon D750? Thanks all in advance for your replies.
Thanks for this info....I think most of the member... (show quote)


You might just get an image with a 10 stop filter, 500 to 600mm lens at f22, S1/4000-8000 with a DSLR. The sensor of a DSLR will be OK providing you don't use live view (that will literally smoke it!), but even with the filter, if you look directly through the viewfinder, you stand a VERY high possibility of permanent central retinal damage. Don't do it! Proper solar filters transfer much less light -and heat.
Go to
Dec 20, 2016 17:40:26   #
samantha90 wrote:
I am hesitant to comment but Jerry, I think it's sexy. The model is gorgeous that doesn't hurt the look.


My wife of 39 years agrees with the look- won't let me shave!
Go to
Dec 18, 2016 17:36:08   #
JimRPhoto wrote:
Other replies are all basically correct. The Brits wear these en masse before and during the period around Armistice Day which is November 11. In the States, as a member of the American Legion, I get one in the mail each year, but here we wear them before and around Memorial Day in May. The big difference is that in the UK where I go on business, well over half the people on the street are wearing these to commemorate their war dead. Here, we don't hardly see them worn around Memorial Day.


Absolutely correct- still a big thing here, quite rightly. Currently 100th anniversary of huge losses. Here's a couple of photos of ceramic poppies installed at the Yorkshire Sculpture Park a year ago. Part of an amazing installation at the tower of London which then toured the country: http://www.hrp.org.uk/tower-of-london/history-and-stories/tower-of-london-remembers/about-the-installation/#gs.39DXAZA


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Dec 17, 2016 16:18:40   #
samantha90 wrote:
I sent this to my Mom..phones are banned at her table. She is a retired high school principle that knows how to enforce zero tolerance. Someone told me once that smart phones are the opium dens of the 21st century.


That must be why there's such a huge reduction in drug and alcohol use among the youngsters in the UK these days!
Go to
Dec 14, 2016 17:35:17   #
anotherview wrote:
Correct spelling of words functions as a useful convention for accuracy of communication. This convention has become stronger in modern times beginning with the publication of dictionaries. Some variation in spelling of select words still persists, though.

This Website does list the spelling "lense" as a variant of the word "lens": https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lens

This variant nonetheless appears in no examples in this online definition, likely so because use convention has settled on the spelling of this word as "lens."

Some readers take offense at faulty spelling.

For my part, I do not. Instead, I reply to the point and substance of the posting.

This approach follows another convention, that of courtesy and respect for others.
Correct spelling of words functions as a useful co... (show quote)


Just for the record, if I am mistaken, I regard it as courteous and respectful to be politely corrected. I'm here to learn!
Go to
Dec 14, 2016 17:09:52   #
Ring wrote:
My understanding is that WWI pilots in combat needed full power in combat, so the throttles were pushed forward all the way. The throttles were capped with balls, and they were pushed forward toward the firewall, hence "balls to the wall".


That sounds more likely. In the UK, the phrase is 'balls out' - which of course fits with the steam engine governor.
Go to
Dec 8, 2016 04:46:17   #
Shutterbox60 wrote:
Bottom Line: It's about showing up and participation, not what you're wearing. Anyone who wants to put people down for their dress needs to learn what respect is really about!! Remember, Jesus hung out with the POOR, not the Kings or the wealthy. Certain attire was not a requirement!!
Get it????


Absolutely! I don't get God at all, but I really get Jesus. Unfortunately many so-called Christians act like they've forgotten most of Jesus' work and examples.
Go to
Dec 7, 2016 17:48:14   #
Delightful. Thank you so much.

I'm now off to get some size 12 Hello Kitty slippers to see if they'll fix my hip...
Go to
Dec 7, 2016 17:43:56   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Being old doesn't mean you're good, and being young doesn't mean you're bad.


Absolutely true. I'm constantly impressed by local youngsters- polite, helpful, much less prone to moaning when things don't go their way. Most entitled moaners I come across are middle aged and older.

I think some people here should try engaging with youngsters with respect and an open mind- they might get a surprise.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 63 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.