Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Clynro
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
Sep 30, 2013 02:19:43   #
The moose are coming down with the first snowfall of the year in the mountains!

I'd love some pointers on these shots from those of you with more experience. The light for all of them was poor, as most of the time moose only come out at dawn or at dusk, and all of these were in the shadows. The family was about a hundred yards away and that image is cropped from a shot taken at 200mm. The others were taken from about 10-20 yards out.

I increased the ISO and opened the aperture, while attempting to keep shutter speed at or slightly above focal distance. I'm not sure what else to have done, except get closer, but that was about as close as I could, or even wanted to get--except the family which was across a ravine and a creek.

The largest bull Moose I've ever seen in the wild


You don't see this very often--the whole family!


This guy was watching us watch the family above from behind

Go to
Sep 26, 2013 17:49:27   #
sailorsmom wrote:
Wow! I love everyone of these shots Clyn! Just beautiful!


Thanks, Sailorsmom, for the kind words!
Go to
Sep 26, 2013 17:48:48   #
Valenta wrote:
Lovely set
(Wished I was there!)


We had a wonderful time. There were people on our ship that had done that exact same cruise 17 times! I don't think I would ever do that, but the weather can be unpredictable enough, that I might be inclined to go again if I had a bad weather experience, but our weather was pretty good.
Go to
Sep 26, 2013 17:46:51   #
bcheary wrote:
Interesting set. Thanks for sharing. :thumbup: :thumbup:


I appreciate the kind words!!
Go to
Sep 26, 2013 13:07:34   #
I love #2. I think it would make an interesting presentation to crop the waterfall and the weeds in the foreground so that it appears to be a scene from a natural setting, and then show it side by side with the original. Just to demonstrate that beauty can be found in all walks of life and in all settings! I definitely think you found the nugget in that scene!
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 21:05:30   #
sb wrote:
Of course, the point is that the young lady who simply "thinks" she doesn't need insurance may be in an accident while riding her motorcycle or may suddenly come down with lupus which leaves her with kidney failure waiting for a transplant - and WE will pay for it. The point with the mandate is to encourage everyone to be covered so that the rest of us won't have to cover them.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 20:42:01   #
Thanks again. I'm very open to c/c if anyone has ways to improve on what I attempted.
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 20:39:49   #
dmeyer2m wrote:
In the time that I've been a member on UHH, I've seen several discussions (rants) about the Photo Gallery: being polite and saying thank you to those who take the time to post comments; some saying they just don't have time to leave comments; and slamming those who post 'nice' comments about perceived 'poor' photos.

The administrators will have to respond to this post based on what can or cannot be done with the programming, but here is my proposal.

Add a clickable box for "Likes" alongside each photo image. (Let's just skip the "Don't Like" as it is just needlessly hurtful for the Gallery.) This solution would remedy several issues:
1. People short on time could leave a positive response;
2. The poster would realize how many favorable views his/her photo was actually getting;
3. Comments could still be posted if so desiring for suggestions or to give special kudos;
4. The poster would not be obligated to respond to every comment since the "Likes" are anonymous;
5. Our mailboxes wouldn't fill up every time there is a post to a watched topic--clicking the "Watch Topic" could be optional.
6. Wouldn't that relieve a lot of data sharing on the system?
7. Since every comment re-shuffles the order of the posts, would this not help keep newer posts from getting buried under those getting repeated exchanges?

If this has been asked before I came on board, please excuse the redundancy. It just seems like such an obvious solution, though.


Please add your own pros and cons to this idea.
In the time that I've been a member on UHH, I've s... (show quote)


I think all of those suggestions would be great additions!
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 14:31:16   #
What part of there are no free lunches is so hard for people to understand? Someone always has to foot the bill!
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 14:29:48   #
We were there the first two weeks of August. We were in the interior the first week--where the weather has been unseasonably warm this year (85 F in Fairbanks!), and the second week on the cruise. We had a little mild rain, but only enough to make me think twice about protecting my gear by putting it under my jacket, but not enough to prevent me from getting the shots I wanted. I also had a waterproof P&S for the worst times. I like that combo, but sometimes I forget to wipe off the glass protecting the lens, which leads to droplet shaddows which are annoying.
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 13:09:55   #
Riverbud wrote:
Wow, we just returned from our Alaska cruise also just as you said it was great. We went on the NC Jewel Aug. 31. Could not believe how beautiful Alaska is. Great photos thanks for sharing.


My pleasure!!
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 13:05:33   #
• American making less than $45,960 as individual or $94,200 as a family of 4 may be eligible for premium tax credits through the marketplace. Tax credits subsidize insurance premium costs.

This is the part that really irritates me about this whole Obamma Care Initiative. The insinuation here is that a family of 4 who makes almost $100,000 cannot afford to purchase health insurance for their family. So we're creating the expectation that such a family shouldn't have to. This is rediculous! I am sure that such a family would have a bunch of smart phones (my annual expenditure for 4 cell phones, not all of which ae smart phones with data plans, is somewhere around $1500, cable TV and high speed internet (my annual cost for these services is about the same), etc. I'm certain that for that kind of money, a pretty decent insurance plan could be obtained. If I didn't have a life and death benefit such as health care, these non-essential niceties are the first things that would be cut from my budget. In fact, that's exactly what I did with my family as a student. Making less than half of the $45,000 above, I managed to provide health care coverage for my kids, and that was without a job that provided benefits and on the private insurance market. Yes, it didn't allow me to have a cell phone (I got by with a pager), or cable TV (I used rabit ears), and I had dial up Net Zero for free. This is what I mean by social irresponsibility--expecting someone to provide for me what I can and should provide for myself, so that I can divert my discretionary income to unnecessary luxuries.

There are certainly those that need help and should be offered assistance, but the definitions above for determining the income level necessitating governmental subsidy is absurd.

Where is the money for a program that provides health care for such families going to come from anyway? We're "running out of money" according to the government and threatening to have to shut the government down as a result. And we're entertaining the idea of creating an additional entitlement to health insurance premiums for a huge segment of the population that doesn't in reality "need" it--that could provide it for themselves? And that's in addition to sending out recruiters to encourage people not using food stamps and getting by, to sign up and suck more out of an already stressed financially stressed system. (don't get me started on that) Are we nuts?
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 12:37:36   #
bcheary wrote:
You silly woman you really drank the koolaide! You must have the IQ of a moron if you believe that crap.


Are you suggesting that people won't try to figure out how to get around the system--to try to receive the benefits of health care without paying for it? If so then that is very naive. I see it everyday--EVERYDAY--people that COULD afford health care and who choose not to obtain it. Instead, they choose to force themselves on the system and expect the government to pay for it, or health care providers to write it off. It's called social irresponsibility, and it is the disease of our time!
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 10:48:12   #
foxhal wrote:
Great photos, looks like you had nice weather as well. When (what month) were you there, we will be in Alaska late May to mid June 2014 and we're trying to figure out what weather to expect.


We were there the first two weeks of August. From what I've heard, it's pretty much a crap shoot weather wise whenever you decide to go. My wife was the trip planner and chose our trip when the temperatures would be the warmest and when the kids were out of school and not in their various activities. It was pretty good for us, though there were a couple of days when there was just enough rain to be inconvenient, but not so much to stop us from doing anything we really wanted to do or see. All in all, the weather was pretty good though. No complaints from me on that one. Ketchikan gets over 13 feet of rain a year, which averages almost a half inch of rain a day. Mount McKinley is seen by only 30% of those that go to visit it because of the weather that surrounds the peak. That may give you an idea of what to expect.
Go to
Sep 24, 2013 01:24:36   #
Great photos, by the way!!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.