Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: tdekany
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 520 next>>
Mar 19, 2019 22:40:27   #
Chris T wrote:
That article can be read - straight from the horse's mouth, Tom - by following through the links provided earlier in this very thread.

I am NOT claiming anything, Tom ….

Just sharing the content of the post provided at that link …


Fake news Chris. Olympus is not going out of business. Similar type of claims have been made numerous times in the last 10 years. The truth is that Olympus is introducing new cameras and lenses this year.

Lots and lots of people don’t want to carry heavy gear as they age. M4/3 is perfect for them.
Go to
Mar 19, 2019 18:48:17   #
Bipod wrote:
What on earth are you talking about?

You said "Olympus isn't going anywhere."
Personally, I think Olympus is going along nicely.

Does your mommy know you're on the Internet? Did you
get her permission?


Seems you can’t follow this thread. Chris t is posting claims that Olympus May go out of business. It is simply not true.
Go to
Mar 19, 2019 15:52:23   #
Bipod wrote:
I'm interested in your "Lady" form of address, tdekany.

Do you have a problem with women? Or is your problem homophobia?
What is your problem?

Please take it another board.


No comments on comparing our snapshots?
Go to
Mar 16, 2019 14:41:03   #
Bipod wrote:
No, a photographer is someone who respects photography and
takes good pictures. That excludes you, sonny.


Lady, either way, you are not a photographer.

But any time you can take some time out of your trolling, I’ll be happy to post some of my photos against yours.
Go to
Mar 14, 2019 23:06:04   #
Bipod wrote:
Got anything to say about photography?


Yes.

A photographer is someone who takes pictures. You lady, I don’t think you are one.
Go to
Mar 14, 2019 15:28:29   #
Bipod wrote:
I never said I operated a camera touchscreen in gloves. You are a liar.


So than you are a liar, making claims that you have never actually tested. Lady, you have a lot of issues.
Go to
Mar 14, 2019 14:43:48   #
Chris T wrote:
Not me, Tom … must've been someone else. Read the article, Tom - it's only a couple of months old.

You know - the last time you mentioned Samsung - IN THIS VERY THREAD - you pointed out Samsung was over and done with - and I was quick to point out the Galaxy NX series - is still very much with us. But, perhaps - because it was convenient not to acknowledge it - to advance your argument, you chose to ignore it … do yourself a favor, Tom … and Google the Samsung Galaxy NX-30 … would you, PLEASE!!!!
Not me, Tom … must've been someone else. Read the ... (show quote)


(Download)
Go to
Mar 14, 2019 14:41:31   #
Chris T wrote:
Not me, Tom … must've been someone else. Read the article, Tom - it's only a couple of months old.

You know - the last time you mentioned Samsung - IN THIS VERY THREAD - you pointed out Samsung was over and done with - and I was quick to point out the Galaxy NX series - is still very much with us. But, perhaps - because it was convenient not to acknowledge it - to advance your argument, you chose to ignore it … do yourself a favor, Tom … and Google the Samsung Galaxy NX-30 … would you, PLEASE!!!!
Not me, Tom … must've been someone else. Read the ... (show quote)


Who claimed that you have been saying it for 8 years? Please reread what I wrote.
Go to
Mar 14, 2019 14:06:20   #
Chris T wrote:
Tom … all links to these articles are already in this very thread. All you need do is follow them through.


For at least 8 years you read the same claim that Olympus is done. How many articles did you read prior to Samsung getting out of the camera business? I mean interchangeable cameras.
Go to
Mar 14, 2019 11:15:16   #
Bipod wrote:
Baloney--I was on-topic, you are not. You stopped by just to troll.

Some touch screens can be pain--as I expained (and you ignored).
In any case, it was just an aside.

The point (which do not careabout) is whether or the OP wants a touch screen.

How many UserIDs do you have on UHH, tdekany?


You still haven’t given us the model number for the camera that you can’t operate in gloves. No matter how many times you make a false claim, it doesn’t become true. So how about that camera? Are you speaking from personal experience, or just making up BS?

Btw, first you accused some of us being employees of camera makers, now of multiple accounts. Please be a good old man and don’t skip your medication for paranoia.
Go to
Mar 14, 2019 11:07:51   #
Bipod wrote:
Don't take the bait, Chris. He's just trolling.

"Olympus is not going anywhere" can mean two very different things.
(He doesn't care which--as long as it gets a reaction.)

Asahi Pentax merged into Hoya Coporation, which then sold the Pentax
camera business to Ricoh Ltd. The name of the division has since been
changed to Ricoh Imaging Co. Ltd, a division of Ricoh Co. Ltd.

Ricoh's fiscal yera ends on March 19, so that the last annual report is a bit
dated. But as of year-end it had 97,879 employees. Pentax cameras are a
tiny bit of it's many products, which include:
* office printing products
* industrial printing products (including consumables, servies and software)
* office computer servers, network equipment, services and software
* optical equipment
* electrical units
* semiconductors
* industrial cameras
* 3D printng products
* environment and health related products
according to S&P Global Market Intelligence (provided by Bloomberg)
https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=408556

We'll know more when the 2019 Q1 and 2019 annual financial reports are released
in a few weeks, but I'd be surprised if the Imaging division numbers were broken out.
Don't take the bait, Chris. He's just trolling. b... (show quote)


Are you being silly again? You have zero proof that Olympus is going out of business. Stop acting like a little boy.
Go to
Mar 14, 2019 04:46:44   #
billnikon wrote:
I am happy you fee that way. Next time your at the PUBLIC beach, take your camera and go up to girls in their bikinis and start taking their photo's with their dad's sitting behind them. Go ahead, I dare you. And remember, YOU HAVE YOUR RIGHTS, don't you.
And, it appears you feel YOUR rights supersede others rights to privacy. Hope you have your camera insured.


This resoning of yours is simply stupid. I’m sorry. No matter how the father reacts, the photographer is still in the right. Nothing to do with the law.
Go to
Mar 14, 2019 00:55:05   #
Bipod wrote:
Some touch screens require conductive gloves. Didn't you know that, tdekany?
Guess you've never tried to use an ATM machine with gloves on.

How your sales of 30" x 24" prints made from MFT format going?

Got any in gallleries that you care to name? Maybe I'll go buy one.


Stop your abuse please.

Miss info is miss info. We are here to learn from CORRECT info, not BS.,

Question for someone, who refuses to post a photo that he took.

What is the camera that you claim needs gloves off? Are you even speaking from personal experience, or just made it up?
Go to
Mar 14, 2019 00:00:30   #
Bipod wrote:
In cold climates, touch screens are a pain--have to take your gloves
off or have special gloves.


Which camera? I use 2 with full functioning touch screens and don’t have to take my gloves off. You simply touch the screen where you want the camera to focus and it takes a photo. You should upgrade your old cameras.

Less miss information please. People are interested in correct info, not BS.
Go to
Mar 13, 2019 23:29:25   #
Chris T wrote:
The article I read - pretty much verbatim, Tom ….

According to the latest reports, Olympus is doing badly. And it’s so bad, that the company could even leave the digital camera market. Reportedly, the company’s activist shareholders could force Olympus to exit the market and go into a different direction.
The 4/3 Addict writes that Olympus’ financial results for the Q3 of 2018 were far from promising. Consolidated revenue in the Imaging Business went down 19%. The operating loss amounted to ¥13,129 million, compared with an operating profit of ¥1,493 million in the same period of the previous fiscal year. These declines are reportedly the result of several factors. These include the constraints on supplies of some of the company’s products. Also, the competition in the mirrorless camera market and the restructuring of Olympus’ manufacturing locations all led to a massive loss in revenue.
The same source explains that these losses got the shareholders upset. “Many Olympus shareholders happen to be foreigners and they are starting to make headway,” the 4/3 Addict writes. “This could eventually lead to Olympus either discounting their camera sales or going in a fundamentally new direction.” For now, none of this has been confirmed, but the fact is that Olympus is struggling.
The article I read - pretty much verbatim, Tom …. ... (show quote)


Chris, how is Pentax doing? 😂

Olympus is not going anywhere.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 520 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.