Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Dr Grump
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
Oct 29, 2023 10:40:25   #
One shot cropped.
Go to
Mar 3, 2023 08:15:31   #
Shooter41 wrote:
My fascination and love for photography started when I was six years old. After watching my father develop negatives in our darkened bathroom in 1947, I ordered my first camera which cost 50 cents and a Wheaties box top. My Samoyed puppy; my baseball playing older brother; my first-grade neighbor with a cap pistol and anything else that moved got their picture taken. Seventy-five years later, I realize that I take far way too many pictures and should be FAR MORE selective before I press the shutter button. I now only take a picture of something if it is both pleasing to my eye and might be interesting or attractive to someone else viewing the image for the first time. When do you think someone should go ahead and take a picture of something? The attached image of a light fixture in my kitchen was taken with my Sony A7R4 with a 70-200 Sony telephoto lens set at F2.8; 1/2000 second shutter speed; and auto ISO. The unusual shaped globe being accentuated by the straight, shiny, brass bass and tightening screws was esthetically pleasing to my eye. Would you photograph it? Shooter41
My fascination and love for photography started wh... (show quote)


I like the pic. I started taking pictures with a Baby Brownie, my 7 year old birthday present--in 1938. I like the idea of pressing that button when I see something that I like to look at and want to be able to see it again. And again. And again...
Go to
Feb 14, 2022 10:16:17   #
As someone who has spent untold hours in the darkroom and loved every minute of it, I thoroughly enjoy the digital counterpart, post-processing. Ansel Adams gave us the analogy: the negative is the score; the print is the performance. Now the file is the score and I delight in seeing how much I can get out of it and into the print. I am often amazed in what can be discovered in what initially appears to be a pretty blah shot.
Go to
Jan 8, 2022 10:13:05   #
Lefty: You say you won't be silenced but it looks like you are going to silence yourself after tomorrow. Goodbye and good luck
Go to
Nov 2, 2021 10:21:16   #
srt101fan wrote:
I see folks here use the term "artistic photography". It's not always clear to me what they mean by that. Anyone want to give us their view?


Any photograph that you don't get tired of seeing over and over.
Go to
Jan 9, 2020 08:45:43   #
Submit the most screwed up image in your portfolio.
Go to
May 20, 2019 09:34:18   #
I am gratified to see so much support for paying our share of running and taking care of our beloved country, i.e., taxes. Nobody likes taxes, and progressive or regressive, there is no way to make taxes absolutely fair. However, taxes have gotten so much bad publicity in recent years that I thought I was the only person who tried to justify them. It's a relief to find out other wise. Is it just photographers who understand the necessity?
Go to
Dec 21, 2018 09:23:57   #
Just because it is a myth doesn't mean that there is not truth in it. See Joseph Campbell.
Go to
Mar 2, 2017 09:39:04   #
Definition of art that I like best:

A work of art is a message to the world, about the world, from the world.
Go to
Feb 25, 2015 09:29:46   #
"The man who compared the negative to a musical score and the print to a performance would, I believe anyway, never have been an in-camera purist. He wasn't an in-camera purist."

And we all know that there are an infinite number of ways that a musical score can be performed. The same holds true, I think, for a negative or a digital file.
Go to
Dec 13, 2014 16:35:29   #
The problem with being an atheist is that you've got no one to cry out to when you have an orgasim.
Go to
Dec 13, 2014 16:35:11   #
The problem with being an atheist is that you've got no one to cry out to when you have an orgasim.
Go to
Aug 25, 2014 08:03:52   #
Greenguy33 wrote:
I look at professionals and top amateurs photo's and see sharp images with almost a 3d image, with separation between objects.
Is it all about the lighting? I know it can't be the equipment, because some of the images are from similar camera's.


While there are so many variables in making pictures, one of the most important is the quality of the lens. I pay considerably more for my lenses than I do for bodies--and I have some expensive bodies.
Go to
Jul 26, 2014 08:31:04   #
sb wrote:
I recently purchased a Canon10-22 EF-S lens. The image quality is far superior to that from the kit lens that I have. I suspect the differences you noticed were the result of the lenses used and not the actual camera.


I absolutely agree. I have paid far more for lenses than for bodies and have found it very worth while.
Go to
Jun 19, 2014 17:02:48   #
C.R. wrote:
how could you possibly underestimate her, she's below whale crap and that's as low as you can go, if she burps in public it's an improvement over her blatherings, what a sow


Such an erudite and intellectual comment. My congratulations! Nice picture, too
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.