Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: rmalarz
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 ... 3373 next>>
Mar 22, 2018 07:45:42   #
roxiemarty, yes, the artists put a good deal of work into those paintings. Yes, the food was voted good by all three of us. I was there with a couple of other large format photographers.
--Bob
roxiemarty wrote:
Nice mural! Was the food good?
Go to
Mar 22, 2018 07:33:13   #
Marty, that they are. Thanks for viewing and commenting.
--Bob
fourg1b2006 wrote:
The people that do these paintings on walls are absolutely fantastic artists. I love this one a lot.
Go to
Mar 22, 2018 07:31:22   #
Scotty, you need to understand that I didn't blow any highlights. I placed the highlights. I processed the image to retain the highlights at the level I considered appropriate for the final image. There is no miraculous recovery of anything. Creating this image with ADL would have been impossible, as RAW is unaffected by that. All one has to do is review the images, made with a digital camera, that I've posted over the last 2-3 years to see the benefit of using ETTR anytime. At this point, the lesson has ended and you can bloviate all you want about your supposed method of making image. I just hope those trying to learn how to make good photographs aren't misled by your opinions.
--Bob

selmslie wrote:
All that shows is that, if you don't blow the highlights, you can recover them.

But if you had taken the image without blowing the highlights in the first place, it would have been just as easy to recover the shadows.

You can deal with a wide DR either way. In fact, you could have achieved a satisfactory image using Active-D lighting and an exposure that was one stop darker, with no blinkies.

ETTR provided no benefit and you have not demonstrated that it is necessary. It's just another way to do the same thing.
All that shows is that, if you don't blow the high... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 22, 2018 07:22:33   #
Second of the series.
--Bob


(Download)
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 23:32:42   #
Sirius_one, thanks for the thumb and smilie.
--Bob
Sirius_one wrote:
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 22:16:08   #
I'll bet you must be the bastion of intelligence in your community.
--Bob
kd7eir wrote:
The Republican messiah can't even spell as well as your typical middle school student.
And then he "corrected" the tweet.

Trump is what passes for a genius among Republicans.
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 22:06:12   #
I should say so that that has an abundance of photo opportunities. Nice going.
--Bob
recalcitrant1 wrote:
Abandoned bridge near Saluda NC Some fun photo-ops in late afternoon and cloudy day. All shots hand-held with Canon 60d, Tamron 10 - 24 lens and ISO 400

comments and cc welcome
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 22:04:25   #
Chas, it's quite simple. All you have to do is contact the admins of the site and let them know you'd like to start a section devoted to cell phone photography. They will provide you with all of the information and admin privileges to maintain it.
--Bob

Chas 69 wrote:
With todays technology and the convenience and versatility of a smart phone in your pocket,
Im surprised i dont see any topics or catagories
containing this subject?
i have seen some awesome photos online useing cell phones..
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 22:00:07   #
Since you want to stick with cars, here's one I photographed for a demonstration on using the ETTR/EBTR techniques. The first, as you can guess, is SOOC. The second was only processed in ACR simply normalizing the histogram.

The initial exposure was spot metered on the brightest part of the front bumper, just forward of the tire. I then increased the exposure 3 stops. That was later compensated in ACR. That was the only adjustment made.

I'm sure you'll find some reason to negate this example, but what really matters is the system works. It's very much the same as The Zone System, simply adapted.
--Bob


selmslie wrote:
Here is a scene with a wide DR that was, in ETTR terms, underexposed by nearly 2 stops. It's not a very good image but it will illustrate my point.

It was taken with Aperture priority at ISO 400 1/4000 sec @ f/8. I forgot that the meter was set to Spot and the exposure was based on the white hood.

If I had used Manual and Sunny 16 I would have taken it at 1/1000 sec and f/11, about one stop brighter.

The JPEG SOOC was very dark. Yet the image developed from the raw file (with about 2 stops of Exposure added in PP) does not suffer from excessive noise.

What would ETTR have done to make it any better? Probably nothing.
Here is a scene with a wide DR that was, in ETTR t... (show quote)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 21:04:56   #
Hi, Sirius_one. Thanks for looking and commenting. Out of gratitude my other photography buddies and I decided to have lunch there are we were done photographing a couple of other locations. The interior is quite nice, very decent decor, and though associated with the exterior, it was quite a bit tamer. The food was really good, as well.
--Bob

Sirius_one wrote:
That is one funky looking building, makes me wonder what the decor inside is like
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 18:56:56   #
Beautiful work, Sylvia.
--Bob
Sylvias wrote:
I survived the ice, snow and gale force winds.

Canon 650D, 18-55 lens.

Please tap on the picture to view with the black background and try the download.
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 18:54:39   #
I have an iPhone. I purchased it specifically for photography related software that runs only on the iPhone. However, when I see a photographic subject that I really think needs to be photographed, the last thing I reach for is my phone. I reach for the camera that I usually have with me.

Conversely, when I want to make a phone call, the last thing I reach for is my camera. Two different tools for two different purposes.
--Bob
Chas 69 wrote:
With todays technology and the convenience and versatility of a smart phone in your pocket,
Im surprised i dont see any topics or catagories
containing this subject?
i have seen some awesome photos online useing cell phones..
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 18:46:54   #
John, I think you are referring to scales that show Depth of Field, not Depth of Focus, which is an entirely different thing.

Yup, same gripe here about "modern" lenses. I miss the DOF scale on the lens. There are charts out, and probably some that can be loaded into a cellphone.
--Bob
John Howard wrote:
For the land/city/water scape shooters out there I have a question. With my Zeiss Batis lenses that show the depth of focus I don't have this issue. But increasingly, I am seeing high quality lenses that have no DoF scale and/or minimal distance scales. So what is your process to get both your foreground element and the distant mountains in focus?

I can use an app to get the hyperlocal distance, thus keeping the infinity distant mountains in focus, and read from the app the near side of the DoF. So suppose, the app says focus at 20 yards? Do you guesstimate the 20 yards? Do you use a laser gun to find something that is 20 yards and then AF that point? If you know the hyperfocal point, do you enlarge and manually focus to that point? With a camera that has focus peaking (ie, the sony mirrorless or the new Nikon D850) do you rely on the peaking to show the DoF?

This all assumes I am asking about tripod shooting landscapes. Probably, there are many approaches to this issue and I'd like to learn.
Thanks,
JH
For the land/city/water scape shooters out there I... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 18:43:55   #
Excellent. Reminds me of the work of Michael Kenna.
--Bob
Ziva's dad wrote:
I took this last summer using a Nikon D7100, 18-200mm Nikon lens set at 24mm and f3.7, approx 5 minute exposure using Firecrest ND4.8 (-16 stop) filter. Some post work in cleaning up noise etc. Would like to improve my skills in this type of photography, any comments, suggestions or critic's are gladly welcomed. Thanks for looking.
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 18:19:34   #
Thank you very much, Sirius_one.
--Bob
Sirius_one wrote:
Superb!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 ... 3373 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.