Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Posts for: Marg
Page: <<prev 1 ... 171 172 173 174 175 176 next>>
May 19, 2018 10:25:58   #
(Photo Gallery)
Curious about editing
Einreb92 wrote:
I am not an expert, by any means, but one thing I know is that the sharpness you desire is in the capture and not so much in post processing. Do some research on the lens you are using and see what a lab determines your sharpest f stop is. For example, my 150-600 5.6 is sharpest at f8. Armed with that knowledge, I next discovered shutter speed is yet another element that must be considered. Also, I do everything I can to eliminate any vibrations. Tripod, monopod or other good techniques is your friend. That is not to say I can’t get a decent image at other combinations, or even handheld, but I am always in search of the sharpest image possible with the gear I have and for me, I am always looking to shoot at f8 and if I am shooting birds, I try and keep my shutter speed at, or north of 800. I hope this helps a little. I am sure others here will give you good feedback. Good luck!
I am not an expert, by any means, but one thing I ... (show quote)


Thanks, Einreb92! These photos were taken using a tripod. Shutter speed, I think was 320 so maybe if I bump that up to 800 or so I can concentrate more on finding the sweet spot with regards to aperture. I will keep practising! Hope to keep improving.
Go to
May 19, 2018 10:19:03   #
(Photo Gallery)
Curious about editing
df61743 wrote:
Here's an attempt at some creative editing LOL A very bold Towhee.

Or perhaps that sort of thing is not exactly what you had in mind.


That’s very creative and funny df61743!
Go to
May 19, 2018 10:17:48   #
(Photo Gallery)
Curious about editing
CHG_CANON wrote:
Marg, the top image looks good at a distance, but not so good in the details. Although EXIF data is available, when I downloaded and pulled the image into DPP, it seems this is an edited version rather than straight from the camera. A few suggestions:

1. Post the original, unedited version into the Post Processing section and ask people to edit and provide details performed.

2. If not done so already, consider shooting in RAW for situations where you're at ISO-2000 such as this example. I'd like to see the original as I think there's more at work here than just the ISO setting.

3. You mentioned admiring other's work. Keep in mind those are likely captured with lenses more capable than your 75-300. I believe points 1 and 2, if performed on your part, you can produce better images with this lens rather than just giving into gear lust.

4. Don't shoot through a window. You seem to have lost a lot of sharpness simply from the added glass between the subject and camera.
Marg, the top image looks good at a distance, but ... (show quote)


CHG_CANON
Here are the same two photos in original for you. I will also take your suggestion to post in the Post Processing section. Thanks!


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
May 18, 2018 22:15:02   #
(Photo Gallery)
Curious about editing
Comparing my photos to those I have admired on this forum, I have coveted the sharpness and detail you all get. I learned on here that sometimes the almost ruffling feathers are the result of good editing. I caught a little Rufus sided towhee through the window and while I am quite pleased with it I wonder what would happen to it with some talented editing. Anyone care to try?


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
May 5, 2018 09:33:50   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Next lens
Marg wrote:
I received my very first camera at age 67. It’s a pre owned Canon t4i. I have 2 kit lenses (18-55 mm and 75-300 mm.) Following unsolicited advice from a number of people I have added a 50 mm f1.8 prime lens. I feel that I have already outgrown the kit lenses and it has been suggested that I save up for an L lens. Do you all concur or disagree. I shoot birds, architectural landscapes, flowers and grandkids. I have not yet found my photography passion. Thanks in advance for any thoughts.
Marg


I have been overwhelmed at the responses to my question! Have been trying to respond to each of you individually but finding it difficult while keeping grandkids this week. I have compiled a list of all of your suggestions and will definitely research so that when I am ready I will have a good idea of what I want to do. I realize it might have been a little premature to think I had “outgrown” the kit lenses, obnoxious even 😂. I will take all suggestions to heart and really study and learn to properly use what I have for now. First order of business - bought a tripod and a remote shutter release. Thanks to each and every one of you!
Marg
Go to
May 4, 2018 12:26:44   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Next lens
gvarner wrote:
Keep in mind that you camera has a crop sensor which means your 50mm is equivalent to an 80mm on a full frame sensor (1.6x crop factor) and your tele at its widest is 18x1.6=28.8 or moderately wide. You might want to consider something wider for landscapes, like down to 10-20mm. This would be equivalent to a full frame 16-32mm.


Thanks for the reply, gvarner! I’ll keep this in mind.
Go to
May 4, 2018 12:24:30   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Next lens
camerapapi wrote:
I am not familiar with Canon but my advise should apply to any camera. Have you learned basic photography? In my humble opinion that is the best investment a photographer can make. Cameras and lenses are tools and we make the pictures not them.
Be patient. Learn about what you have and improve your skills on composition and metering. There is always time to "upgrade" cameras and lenses.


Thank you, camerapapi! Very sage advice. I think I expected to hit the ground running. I must practise both shots and patience!
Go to
May 4, 2018 12:21:22   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Next lens
MTG44 wrote:
Can't beat L lens. Have 100-400 and love . Saving for 24-105 and 70-200.

Thanks for the reply, MTG44!
Go to
May 4, 2018 12:19:55   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Next lens
dsmeltz wrote:
What makes you unhappy with the shots you are currently producing? Of the 5-10 or so shots you have taken of each type of subject (birds, architectural landscapes, flowers and grandkids) that are your favorites, what is the length at which you were shooting? (It is in the EXIF data.)

If you answer these questions it will be easier to help you. In fact if you answer these questions, the answers to your questions may take care of themselves.


Thank you for that great suggestion, dsmeltz! I will cull through my photos and do exactly that!
Go to
May 4, 2018 12:17:48   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Next lens
jwest wrote:
You could use Canon L lenses on your t4i but why. I am curious why you think you have outgrown your current kit. Especially since you state that you have not yet found your photography passion. the 50mm 1.8 was a good choice but you need to spend more time with your camera to discover what you specifically NEED to do with it that can't be done with your kit. L Lenses are probably not the answer. If you are unable to accomplish something now it is probably due to limitations of the camera body. Upgrading the body to a full frame would necessitate upgrading your lease collection too. Upgrading your lenses at this point would be spending money unnecessarily to accomplish little or nothing. L lenses are professional level and while they do produce excellent results they are heavy, expensive, and in many cases unnecessary. Image stabilization may be a factor but at great cost to you.
You could use Canon L lenses on your t4i but why. ... (show quote)


Thanks for the reply, jwest. Maybe I have just allowed myself to be swayed. Because this is my very first camera I opted to take a class. My instructor showed several examples of his work followed by, “well you won’t be able to do that because you only have kit lenses.” I probably should go back and take that with a grain of salt.
Go to
May 4, 2018 12:06:24   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Next lens
mizzee wrote:
The Tamron 18-400 is getting excellent reviews and won't be nearly as expensive L glass. If you go to the B&H website, look up the lens and read the reviews. Also, if you have a good camera store near you, stop by.


Thank you, mizzee. No local camera shop but I certainly will investigate online!
Go to
May 4, 2018 11:32:23   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Next lens
revhen wrote:
The Canon 18-135 is sharp and will cover most of your needs. The 70-300 is excellent and has good reach. But for serious birding perhaps the Sigma Contemporary 150-600 would be best.


Thank you, revhen. I think “sharp” is what I’m missing.
Go to
May 4, 2018 11:28:07   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Next lens
whwiden wrote:
The 50mm prime was a good idea. I would only do that if you are not satisfied with the results from the kit lenses. I would not just do it to conform to opinions of others. I do not know Canon well, but I believe an L lens is professional grade usually shot on higher end bodies.


Thanks, whwiden! I will practise with this 50mm. I’m only not satisfied when comparing to others who, for instance on birds, show the feather detail so clearly that I feel if I blew on them they’d ruffle!
Go to
May 3, 2018 22:33:34   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Next lens
I received my very first camera at age 67. It’s a pre owned Canon t4i. I have 2 kit lenses (18-55 mm and 75-300 mm.) Following unsolicited advice from a number of people I have added a 50 mm f1.8 prime lens. I feel that I have already outgrown the kit lenses and it has been suggested that I save up for an L lens. Do you all concur or disagree. I shoot birds, architectural landscapes, flowers and grandkids. I have not yet found my photography passion. Thanks in advance for any thoughts.
Marg
Go to
Apr 24, 2018 12:54:48   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))
An oldie but goodie!
A lawyer and a senior citizen are seat mates on a lengthy flight.
The lawyer is thinking that seniors are so dumb that he could get one over on him easily.
So, the lawyer asks if the senior would like to play a fun game.
The senior is tired and just wants to take a nap, so he politely declines and tries to catch a few winks.
The lawyer persists, saying that the game is a lot of fun...."I ask you a question, and if you don't know the answer, you pay me only $5. Then you ask me one, and if I don't know the answer, I will pay you $500," he says.
This catches the senior's attention and, to keep the lawyer quiet, he agrees to play the game.
The lawyer asks the first question. "What's the distance from the Earth to the Moon?"
The senior doesn't say a word, but reaches into his pocket, pulls out a five-dollar bill, and hands it to the lawyer.
Now, it's the senior's turn. He asks the lawyer, "What goes up a hill with three legs, and comes down with four?"
The lawyer uses his laptop to search all references he can find on the Net.
He sends E-mails to all the smart friends he knows; all to no avail. After an hour of searching, he finally gives up.
He wakes the senior and hands him $500. The senior pockets the $500 and goes right back to sleep.
The lawyer is going nuts not knowing the answer. He wakes the senior up and asks, "Well, so what goes up a hill with three legs and comes down with four?"
The senior reaches into his pocket, hands the lawyer $5, and goes back to sleep.
I love being a senior!!!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 171 172 173 174 175 176 next>>
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.