I think that he will do better than Obama, Trump's second term is going to be a doozy.

Trump's approval rating is slowly on the rise.... Obama's was not all that great either, you have said what a great president he was.... guess that approval ratings are not nearly as important as you think.

"President Obama entered office with one of the highest approval ratings for a new president at 69 percent, but he left the White House with one of the worst average approval ratings in modern American history at 47.9 percent, according to a recent Gallup poll.

Only Gerald Ford, Harry Truman, and Jimmy Carter left office with lower average approval ratings, leaving Obama behind Richard Nixon, 49% and Bill Clinton, 55.1%, who were both embroiled in infamous scandals that initiated impeachment proceedings. George W. Bush, Obama's predecessor, left office with two land wars in his wake and a 49.4 percent average approval rating, almost two points higher than Obama's.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/obamas-average-approval-rating-one-of-the-lowest/

Horses**t! Horses**t! What? Is it dinner time at your house sarg?

Mike, I have seen more outrageous offerings on this site... McCain is a bully and certainly no gentleman. You may be offended by my words but I assure you that they will have no impact on the discomfort associated with McCain's death. I have no kind thoughts for the man, that is basically what I am saying in the most forcible way I can, a little hyperbole if you will, nothing to get upset about.

It would be nice for some of our liberal friends to read this so that they understand constitutionally guided process and why so many found Obama's executive orders offensive.

Reprint from National Review.


It’s strange that a president who had such a t***sformative effect on our national discourse will leave such a negligible policy legacy. But Barack Obama, whose imperial term changed the way Americans interact and in some ways paved the way for the Trump presidency, is now watching his much-celebrated and mythologized two-term legacy be systematically demolished. This, in many ways, tells us that American governance still works.

When President Trump announced that the United States would withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal, he was able to do so without much difficulty because the agreement hinged on p**********l fiat rather than national consensus. Obama’s appeasement of Iran was only one in a string of unilateral norm-busting projects that deserve to be dismantled.

You’ll remember the panic-stricken coverage we endured when the United States withdrew from the faux international Paris climate agreement last year. It’s true that the deal was oversold as a matter of policy (by both parties for political reasons), but it was symbolic of how the Obama administration concerned itself more with international consensus than with domestic compromise. We know this because the president would never have won ratification for a deal remotely similar to the one he entered — nor did he attempt to. Obama, despite the hagiographic framing of his scandal-ridden presidency, had about as much interest in genuine concession as his political adversaries did.

Obama allies at home incessantly pointed to poll numbers as a justification for his executive abuse, mostly because the only polls that really mattered, congressional e******ns, continued to soundly reject his agenda. The defense rested on the idea that the Republican-led Congress had failed to “do its job” and act on issues Democrats had deemed vital. But Congress, of course, “acted” all the time by checking the president’s ambitions. This was not only well within its purview but also in many ways the reason the e*****rate handed the GOP Congress in the first place.

Even if you substantively supported Obama’s actions — as I do on legalizing the children of immigrants who are in the country illegally, for instance — the reasoning that girded these supposedly temporary executive decisions was soon revealed to be abusive. In 2012, Obama told the nation that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which by any standard was a stand-in for legislation, was merely a “temporary stopgap measure.” By the time Trump overturned it, the measure represented “who we are as a people.” That’s because by “temporary,” Obama always meant “until Democrats can make it permanent through the courts or e*******l victories.”

Even when implementing laws Congress had passed, Obama and his allies relied on coercing participation through mandates. And when it became inconvenient, they began arbitrarily implementing parts of laws. Administrative discretion became administrative abuse. When the president decided the Obamacare’s employer mandate was politically inconvenient, for example, he simply skipped it for expediency.

The Constitution doesn’t say, “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law unless liberals tell us it’s super important.” Yet shortly after the passage of the Affordable Care Act, the Obama administration realized it would need more subsidies and asked for an appropriation from Congress.

When Congress, then teeming with politicians elected on the promise of overturning Obamacare, refused, then–Treasury Secretary Jack Lew ordered the administration to begin making “cost-sharing reduction” payments anyway, without any public legal justification. Obama created a $7 billion per year appropriation for insurance companies participating in the supposedly self-sufficient and competitive state health care exchanges. Not a single liberal pundit that I know of concerned himself with this norm breaking.

While most Americans aren’t sticklers for process, it seems they are content with destroying legacies built on the rickety foundation of unilateralism for political reasons.

One federal court found the Obamacare subsidy unconstitutional, and the case was working its way toward the Supreme Court. But then again, no administration in memory was stopped more often by courts, often by unanimous Supreme Court decisions. Whether it was ignoring the Senate in making appointments or claiming to rewrite employment law, Obama tried to function without constitutional restraints.
None of this even breaches the unprecedented regulatory regime Obama built to circumvent the legislative branch. Even the New York Times characterized his governing as “bureaucratic bulldozing, rather than legislative t***sparency.”


Fortunately, it is also unsustainable. As we now see, this kind of governance not only corrodes constitutional order but also undermines stability, as new presidents busy themselves overturning the executive actions and international agreements enacted by the previous. While most Americans aren’t sticklers for process, it seems they are content with destroying legacies built on the rickety foundation of unilateralism for political reasons.

That’s fine, too. It means that if Trump engages in similar legislative efforts through the executive office, his agenda will also be dismantled one day. That’s as it should be.

Nice to see that you are still around Soba.

You're a pretty sick pup.

I have disliked McCain for years, now the current situation is that he is incapable of returning to DC and v**e on issues yet he refuses to resign, bills are being tabled because they can not get sufficient v**es, Rand Paul seems to have the power to frustrate confirmations....... I don't regret my words.

I still have it, I have been working out of town, I will be done in a couple of weeks and will begin listing it in several locations when I am back in town full time. But yes, I still have all the equipment.

That makes two of us.

Well, maybe he will die a painful death... Karma can be a b***h.

Well Facebook is not a good bet neither is twitter. Do you find anyone being excluded on this site? If you like commenting on news stories Mediaite used to be a good site but the dialogue is probably less informative than here.

This is why, a macro lens can't take these pics without some help, there are things that you can do with a macro lens that will get you to about 2:1 reproduction, there are specialty macro lenses that will get you to 5:1, but the rig I used for these pics cost about $35. I have an expensive macro lens that I seldom use.

(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

She actually said some stupid crap like that, it was a senior moment of which she has many.

LOL.... Neither did Obama, that was Seal Team Six, Obama just watched the show.