Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: JBruce
Page: <<prev 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 next>>
Jan 22, 2017 13:55:04   #
She holds a phone in both pics, you suppose that may have been a contributing factor? Far too often, it is. I know from experience when a distracted driver t-boned me on a red light and nearly killed my wife.
Go to
Jan 17, 2017 10:43:58   #
I have both the EFS 18-135 STM on 80d and the 24-105L on 5d3, and frankly, if the combos are properly micro-focus matched to individual the cameras, it is impossible to tell the difference in an 8x10 print. If you are a pixel-peeper, it is possible under some situations, to see the difference at 100%, but who in a practical situation, does that. Were it my choice, I'd stay with the 18-135 for now, and then when you go FF, start over with a new 24-105 included in the new kit.
JBruce
Go to
Jan 15, 2017 13:36:11   #
Photo taken in Idaho?
Go to
Jan 14, 2017 13:24:51   #
OddJobber wrote:
Well, me for one. I've tried various straps, holsters, pouches, bags, packs, etc., but prefer the freedom of using a wrist strap with a long lens and leaving the rest behind. This carry is non-tiring and keeps the load near my center of gravity. Pretty lame to be so critical of something so simple that you obviously have not tried.


Thanx OddJobber for your support! Yeah, the confusion was my fault for failing to properly post the pic in the first post, and for that I apologize. But I sure don't apologize for the potential help this thread may have provided for those readers who have issues with their cervical vertebrae, and who would still like to carry their heavy camera/lens combos in a practical, painless, ready-for-instant-use way. Like I said, it does work for me, and it's FREE, and that is the bottom line.
Additionally, I guess that it does make good sense for folks to read complete posts from beginning to end before chiming in with their comments-so often they say the same thing that others have already said. Thanks again to all for your helpful inputs, some of the comments may help other suffering souls. Nuff said by me, bye-bye! JBruce
Go to
Jan 14, 2017 09:53:59   #
pelha wrote:
little hard to hike with the camera tucked into your arm! i use a thinktank skin attached to a belt -- either my pack strap, or just a regular pant belt. i've not yet tried the chest harness, that's probably something i should look into. but the waist belt method works well for me, most of the time (except when i need to step up high.)


Actually, it's not hard at all to hike with the camera in the tuck position; just exactly the opposite. the heavy load is so well balanced that there is no need to even keep your left hand on the camera. and if I might stumble, as I do, the camera stays pretty much in place or just swings out on the neck-strap until I regain balance. and further, it would be unusual to walk for more than 15 minutes without either checking out a possible subject, or actually taking a picture. But like I said, when I avoid extended direct neck-strap carry, my neck pain never happens. I also use my chest harness with quick release if I choose to carry two cameras, loaded and at the ready. My chest harness is an Opteka knock off of the Cotton Carrier, and seems to be reliable while performing it's function rather well as the weight is spread evenly across both shoulders and not so much on the neck. Got it through Amazon for around $35 and it works for me.
I'm trying to prolong the inevitable surgery that the deteriorated cervical vertebra will require. Doc says keep doing what you're doing as long as it works, so I will. Meaning no carrying heavy weights directly on neck muscles.

Thanks to everyone for their comments.

JBruce
Go to
Jan 13, 2017 23:21:27   #
robertjerl wrote:
Duh! This ain't rocket science. I learned to carry guns that way over 60 years ago when I first went hunting.
Alternates are shoulder carry, if you get a rig that goes over both shoulders it works even better. Not too expensive, in fact if you have two camera straps you can make your own by attaching both to the camera and put one over each shoulder. You can even get someone to hook a small bungee cord around the two of them behind your back and then they don't slip off when you bend over.
And there are the carry rigs that include a wide belt that rests on the hips with shoulder straps that split the weight three ways. The military uses that type of rig. They cost a bit more. You can put together your own with belt and harness from the surplus store.
I also own a mesh vest with pockets/pouches for misc stuff and anchors for two cameras using an attachment on the tripod socket. Mine was on clearance (new model came out) for less than $30. I seldom use it any more because I now use the socket for a pistol grip.

Oh, forgot, I have a belt with pouch that holds a camera and a medium size lens that has anchor points for a shoulder harness I bought back in the 70s or 80s (I forget just when.) for a film camera with medium telephoto mounted. I should dig it out and use it, it is now used to store one of my old 35 mm cameras with a fast 135 lens mounted.
Duh! This ain't rocket science. I learned to car... (show quote)


Reply to robertjerl
Yeah, I realize there are lots of solutions out there, but just thought I'd offer a possible solution to those folks who my be unnecessarily fearing problems as they age. I too use several other carry techniques for different situations: eg. Vest, Optech camera straps, heavy duty military belt with lens pouches. They all work, but this easy carry is just one more way to spare the neck, and I do know from personal experience you'd be hard pressed to carry a heavy camera/lens combo that is faster on the draw and yet less stressful on the tender neck muscles.
Go to
Jan 13, 2017 13:11:05   #
Sorry Hoggers, when I go back and look at my post, it appears as if the photo did not attach. I will try again and repost with the photo this time.

I have been reading many posts of late expressing concern over whether one should sell their APS-C or FF kit and then buy some other, smaller size equipment. If that is your choice, fine; but there is another, FREE, option you might first consider. My wife came up with this when she became the new "owner" of my new Canon 70-300L lens. It was somewhat heavier than the 55-250 she'd been using, so required a new carrying approach. I guess this was a natural for her as that's how she carries her heavy purse when in a crowded area. I now use this carry option as well, at least part of the time, with most lens/camera combinations.
This past spring we spent a week in the 4-corners states and I (at 78) carried my 5d Mk III with my 100-400L Mk II with no neck problems. Of course you still use the neck strap (Optech) for safety and occasional hanging around the neck when changing lenses, etc. We walked a lot and I felt no discomfort at all. It appears to me that it's not how far you walk, it's how you carry the rig.

Give it a try, you may extend the life span of your current gear until you're a basket case and no longer need any gear! That's my plan; actually I just bought a new (refurb) 80d, and it's no lightweight either.

John


(Download)
Go to
Jan 13, 2017 13:03:54   #
oldtigger wrote:
what is the "free other option"?


Look at the photo again. Simply hold the camera on your forearm; that's the option which costs nothing at all, and certainly does work for me. This method is less hassle than using my cotton carrier knock-off as the camera is always ready for instant use, plus the weight is being carried on the arm's major bone structure and not on the more vulnerable neck/shoulder muscles. Aged lives matter. Okay?

John
Go to
Jan 13, 2017 09:48:03   #
I have been reading many posts of late expressing concern over whether one should sell their APS-C or FF kit and then buy some other, smaller size equipment. If that is your choice, fine; but there is another, FREE, option you might first consider. My wife came up with this when she became the new "owner" of my new Canon 70-300L lens. It was somewhat heavier than the 55-250 she'd been using, so required a new carrying approach. I guess this was a natural for her as that's how she carries her heavy purse when in a crowded area. I now use this carry option as well, at least part of the time, with most lens/camera combinations.
This past spring we spent a week in the 4-corners states and I (at 78) carried my 5d Mk III with my 100-400L Mk II with no neck problems. Of course you still use the neck strap (Optech) for safety and occasional hanging around the neck when changing lenses, etc. We walked a lot and I felt no discomfort at all. It appears to me that it's not how far you walk, it's how you carry the rig.

Give it a try, you may extend the life span of your current gear until you're a basket case and no longer need any gear! That's my plan; actually I just bought a new (refurb) 80d, and it's no lightweight either.

John
Go to
Dec 17, 2016 09:58:02   #
Check out one of the world's most famous early photos. It shows the Wright brothers and the 1st true airplane on December 17, 1903.

http://earthsky.us1.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=e56e7a92b1c5790f7343ef95a&id=ce1b5987fe&e=0a4d853088

This is a fun site where I receive daily science updates.

JBruce
Go to
Dec 7, 2016 16:40:51   #
I recall seeing about half a dozen of these unique dump wagons sitting at an abandoned mine near the ghost town of Kendall, MT in about 1975. Sad to say, some "collector" had turned them over and stolen the wheels off of every one.
JBruce
Go to
Dec 6, 2016 10:02:29   #
I would just say this to all of you who have questions about factory refurbs. Do like I did when I bought my refurbished Canon 80d last week from the Canon Store, I called a tech guy at Canon and asked him what they did to refurbish a camera, and if the shutter clicks are reset to zero. His response was that the refurbs they sell are brand new and are mostly returns from retailers that have been on the shelf too long. They have never been in a customer's hand so there is no need to reset the shutter count. Each returned camera or lens is checked for appearance, visible damage and also tested for functionality (Mine had zero clicks). I've owned five different Canons over the years and have had no problems, ever. Thus I do trust their work and their employees to provide the best possible advice and service. I can only speak to my experience, so your mileage may vary under different circumstances.

JBruce
Go to
Dec 2, 2016 11:30:22   #
Satman wrote:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/816112-REG/Digieffects_SDXCF_Extreme_SD_HC_XC_to_CF.html

$12.50 had it for a few years, served me well.


Thank you Satman, I've tried to find these before, and any I did find had poor reviews, but this one seems to work fine if used in the suggested cameras, my 5d3 is in that group. It is now in my B&H cart.

JBruce
Go to
Dec 1, 2016 15:44:20   #
Satman, What brand is your CF to SD card adapter? I tried to find such a thing, and all those I found had poor customer reviews. I assume that yours is something that you trust and use. Thanks

JBruce
Go to
Dec 1, 2016 09:58:45   #
OK, I'm going to fuel your desire. I posted on the 25th that Canon had a package deal including a refurbished 80d with a 18-55 STM lens for $899. I ordered and it arrived here two days ago. It is brand new and has zero shutter clicks, and so far seems to have no requirement to do any AFMA on the lenses I've tested! I passed my 70d on to my wife and will be selling her 60d. So this way we both get a "Christmas" present!! Just checked and they are still in stock. Here's the link to Canon: https://shop.usa.canon.com/shop/en/catalog/eos-80d-ef-s-18-55mm-f-3-5-5-6-is-stm-kit-refurbished?cm_sp=CD-_-HP_Takeover-_-BF

JBruce
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.